Prenatal testing that diagnoses autism? That's right. Recent British scientific research makes this kind of testing sound like a future possibility for pregnant women.
However, what is the ethical dilemma behind such testing, especially since autism runs such a wide spectrum?
This week in Special Needs Living, aurorabunny, mom to 3-year old Brody, who has autism, expresses her worries about such prenatal testing, should it become available.
Amnio Testing for Autism a Possibility
by aurorabunny
A friend posted a news story on Facebook that caught my eye this week regarding new information that might make prenatal testing for autism a possibility. While the thought of a test that could prenatally detect autism interests me, I can't say that it doesn't horrify me at the same time. I've always been extremely morally opposed to terminating a pregnancy due to a child's possible disability, but terminating a pregnancy due to a condition that might not even BE a disability raises some entirely new ethical issues.
While many disabilities are fairly black and white, autism is a very broad spectrum. Autism may cause severe life-long debilitation for one individual and perhaps just minor social difficulties for another. The prenatal testing described in the article would have no way to tell which end of the spectrum a person might be at, and therefore I just can't see how anyone could make a potentially life-altering decision based on that type of a test — unless, of course, there were parents lining up to ensure that their children had not an ounce of anything that might even possibly be described as a disability or handicap, which is an entirely different and scary scenario in my opinion.
When I read about new tests like this, it makes me wonder how long it might be until we are testing for even the most minor of issues that might cause a person to be perceived as being "less productive" in our society. What about testing for things like depression, anxiety, or even obesity? ("Mrs. Smith, we've isolated a gene that shows your child has a 75% chance of becoming really fat at some point in their life, do you still wish to move forward this pregnancy?") That might sound like quite a stretch, but to me the possibility of prenatal autism testing represents a large and scary step towards ensuring only a "perfect" society.
Some argue that testing like this would be used more as helpful tool that would help parents prepare earlier for a child with autism. I've heard the same thing said about the amnio testing for Down Syndrome, yet statistics show that over 90% of pregnancies where parents are informed of a confirmed Down Syndrome diagnosis end in abortion. That makes the "helpful tool" scenario more than a little bit laughable in my opinion. It really makes me wonder what people like Sir Isaac Newton, Mozart, Charles Darwin, or even Bill Gates (all rumored to be somewhere on the autism spectrum) would think about such a test?
What do you think about prenatal testing for autism? If you are or plan to become pregnant, would you utilize this testing should it become available? Why or why not?
Previous Special Needs Living posts from aurorabunny:
Marriage & Divorce: Special Needs Living
Alternative Treatments for Autism: Special Needs Living
Mastectomy Photos Banned in Another Facebook Fail
Arrest in Etan Patz Missing Child Case (VIDEO)
A Chilling Past Life Experience Recounted
3 Red White & Blue Cocktails
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
Ashley Is a Widow Who Stays Strong...
Stephanie is a Surrogate Mom
I Named My Kid SpongeBob!
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies

Comments (16)
While statistics may say 90%, I ONLY had the testing done in my pregnancy because I wanted a 'leg up' if something was wrong. Honestly I can't fathom an 'issue' that would cause me to terminate.
It's hard for me to express my feelings on these types of tests. I think they ARE good if you are using them for what I am...but if you are trying to 'weed out' issues your child might have by terminating pregnancies, then I have a real problem with it. I wouldn't ever be okay with that...yet part of me thinks...thank goodness. Because if someone would terminate a child because they weren't 'perfect' then isn't a good thing that that baby was never born to them to begin with? Wow that sounds harsh...I certainly would choose life over disability, and would hope others would as well....and honestly I think if you wouldn't...then you shouldn't even have any children. Because one can not predict EVERYTHING. Consider this. A family has testing done, finds out child will be on the A.S. So they terminate. They conceive again, mom gives birth, they all go home and are in a car accident. Baby is alive but it's brain has now been severely damaged. You NEVER know what's coming. Aborting 'imperfect' (and I use that phrase VERY loosely) children until you conceive a 'normal' child is just sadistic.
I find it funny to see this when all I have heard is so many people so quick to say autism isn't caused by genetics, which I for one have never agreed with. Well ladies, this puts your vaccine caused my child's autism to a standstill I hope. Autism is a genetic disorder folks. Very few disabilities are not. In fact, the only one that comes off the top of my head that isn't genetic is Cerebral Palsy. This is caused for a brain injury, whether it be from lack of oxygen at birth, in utero or sometime before the age of 3. I am well vested in knowing as much about CP as I do because I have a child with it. No one could tell me my daughter would have had CP because she had a minor stroke at 18 months due to a misdiagnosis by an ER physician who sent her home and wouldn't treat her with fluids. Thus causing her to dehydrate more and throw a blood clot. My daughter has a blood disorder we didn't know about until she was 4 which causes her to clot easier than others.
So people please understand that while you want to know why your child has autism, you may never know. Ask a mother who has a child with down syndrome why and she can't tell you why. But I have yet to hear a mother of a chidl with down syndrome blame things for her child's condition. So please be able to understand. And I too would chose life with a disability over anything else.
This doesn't prove the cause of autism at all....
I don't understand how you inferred that from the article above.
I wasn't aware that 90% of people abort down't syndrome babies! I'm so sad about this. I have a son born with one lung, and there's no known cause. I had two babies after him and one before him that had no problems; and with each pregnancy after him, I had to be screened for birth defects. I wouldn't have aborted his little brother just because he had only one lung-it would make it easier to have the right care for him at birth. Which is how I would feel about a down syndrome baby or an autistic child; I see prenatal testing as a way to prepare yourself for the challenges ahead, and also as a chance to get the right care for my baby after they are born.
I would never abort for this! I would use these tests, but never so I could abort if the child had a problem. I love my son with one lung, and although there's been MANY, many, many hours of sadness, pain, and difficulty because of hospitilizations, I would never take a minute of having him in my life back. I can't see my life without him, and being his mom has changed my life for the better. I'm blessed beyond belief.
I did have a test that said I could possibly have a down syndrome baby; I choose to not find out for sure. I was already having a cesarean, and they can tell visually at birth if the baby has down's. We have good hospitals here, so I know he would get good care if he had downs.
It hasn't been proven how/where/what autism is from. So how would they do pre-natal testing? Sounds like a joke to me. Also, it will just give a lot of woman another "reason" to have an abortion.
If you can do tests to see if your child "could" have autism then it shows there is a genetic marker for it. Do you not understand how that works? It is the same as down syndrome. There is a genetic marker that shows the "possibility" of down syndrome. Nothing is 100% guaranteed in utero. The whole point is that if you can find a genetic marker that is altered in these children with autism it shows that it isn't from vaccines. I am NOT saying that there is more to it than a genetic issue. some people can carry a genetic marker but other things bring it out. I am simply stating that vaccines on their own are not the cause either as most people want to state.
I am not opposed to this testing. As with DS, there are varying levels of severity, and it is beneficial, I think, for as much information as possible to be available to help parents prepare for their child's future needs.
We didn't really think that anything was wrong with our daughter until she was nearly 2 1/2 years old--and even then did not suspect ASD. She wasn't diagnosed with ASD until she was just four months shy of her 3rd birthday. We could have started speech therapy and PT and OT so much sooner, and we'll never know how much it could have helped her. We do know that early intervention is so important to children with developmental delays. If we had had a prenatal test available, we may well have taken advantage of it. I don't think we would have considered terminating, even though I am pro-choice. But I do lament the time we could have had to provide her with the therapies that she needed. I just didn't know, and didn't suspect anything until shortly after she turned two and became very ill from a stomach virus. The questions we were asked when she was in the hospital started us on the path of developmental evaluations. Autism wasn't even on our radar until a few months later, when we ruled out her seizure disorder as the main cause of her delays. If we'd known then what we know now. . .
I just hope that it won't give unresponsible women another reason to abort. Autism is challenging at times, but it's not hard to deal with when you get used to your child. My son has a diagnosis of autism, & is so very loving & affectionate. I couldn't see him any different.
Part of me thinks this is great, because it would "prove" ( and I use this word loosley) that children develop autism after being exposed to brain damaging heavy metals after birth. " Well Dr. I did the autism test when I was pregnant, so why is my 12 month old just now showing signs of autism?" But part of me is VERY concerned about this, how accurate would these tests be? How honest and ethical would the physicians performing the tests, or analysing the tests be? The test itself is not the issue, it's the possibily of coruption that could occur. Not to mention simple human error.
JoyXtwo, a test like this wouldn't "prove" that autism is caused by toxins. It may be that some cases are caused by environmental factors, ie, reactions to vaccinations, but many (and dare I say most?) cases have genetic links. In fact, even for those whose autism is of the regressive nature would probably show some genetic propensity to the disorder--those who had strong reactions to vaccinations, for example, would probably show some genetic link that made them more vulnerable. That, to me, is another good argument in favor of prenatal testing. For those who test positive, parents and pediatricians would be on extra alert to reactions to vaccinations and would have good cause to avoid them or alter the schedule.
My daughter definitely falls into the category of having been born with the disorder, and I know of several parents who did not vaccinate their children and yet have children with autism. I don't think it is appropriate to assume that all cases of autism are caused by "heavy metal toxicity". It certainly isn't the case with my daughter, and cannot explain the increase of autism in other parts of the world, including places where vaccinations are uncommon, or its appearance in history before vaccinations and other environmental factors made their debuts.