We've all been warned, repeatedly: Even the most run-of-the-mill outpatient surgical procedures can be risky. But when the odds of something going wrong are approximately one in a million -- or even one in a few hundred thousand -- I think most of us figure we're probably in the clear.
Of course that's a harder call to make when it comes to our kids. No parent makes medical decisions lightly. So it broke my heart to hear about the South African 3-year-old who died following a routine circumcision.
As his mother said, "My child was not sick when I walked into the clinic with him."
And now he's gone, all because of one doctor's negligence.
Little Chinonso Onyenekwu didn't wake up after his operation. And even though the extremely alarmed recovery room nurse tried, repeatedly, to get Dr. Charles Mdamombe to examine the unconscious boy, he refused. The boy was fine, he insisted, and anyway, Dr. Mdamombe wasn't finished eating lunch.
Ironically, Chinonso died because Dr. Mdamombe didn't bother to check to see whether the child had eaten lunch, or breakfast, or anything else for six hours before administering general anesthesia. He just went ahead and put the boy to sleep, which resulted in the contents of his stomach pushing up into his lungs, choking him to death.
(It's worth noting here that Mdamombe is NOT a trained anesthesiologist.)
When he realized the boy was dead, the doctor tried to bolt -- but Chinonso's father stopped him with the help of clinic security guards. He's now serving 10 years for culpable homicide.
Of course that doesn't bring Chinonso back. His doctor's punishment doesn't change the fact that his death was avoidable and needless.
And that's exactly why this horrible death should NOT be used to support arguments against circumcision. Chinonso died because of one person's mistake; it would be disrespectful to the child's family to exploit their sorrow for any agenda.
Do the risks involved in routine surgeries scare you as a parent?
Image via Mike LaCon/Flickr
Exclusive 'Snow White & the Huntsman' Clip (VIDEO)
Arrest in Etan Patz Missing Child Case (VIDEO)
A Chilling Past Life Experience Recounted
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Memorial Day Survival Guide
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis

Comments (71)
That is so sad. It makes me so angry.
Am I the only one who thinks that the parents may be to blame some too?
First off, the surgery wasn't needed.
Second off, I am sure they were instructed that the boy SHOULD not eat so many hours prior the the procedure.
I would just like to point out that, roughly, 100 baby boys in the STATES die from circumcision. Even more are permantly disfigured, so the idea that something going wrong during this "routine" surgery is next to nill is incorrect.
Anyway, there is a lot wrong with what happened. We can only assume that he was taken in unnecessarily for the surgery and that the parents weren't instructed to feed him, but we don't know. I do place the blame on the doctor however. Because of his irresponsiblity in not reacting to the child's needs, and it's possible he didn't inform the parents NOT to feed the child and we do know he didn't check to make sure he didn't, this poor baby is now gone. Like I said, it is possible something would have happened anyway, but the doctor was still completely negligent.
Shame on everyone who thinks the parents derseve an ounce of blame. That's just sad.
^ Ditto
The people who are saying "Why was he in surgery", does the title of the article not tell you? Circumcision! It's the doctor who is to blame, not the parents. The doctor REFUSED to check on the boy, because he hadn't finished his lunch and when he FINALLY checked the boy and realized he was dead, the doc tried to RUN! Add on that he was not a trained anesthesiologist and was the one who administered the anesthetic. Honestly, it makes me wonder how many other patients that doctor had that died.
Why did the boy need the circumcision? It's an unnecessary surgery that he should never have had. If he had been left intact, he wouldn't be dead.
Ultimately, the doctor is to blame and I'm glad he's facing jail time. I just hope that the boy's parents can heal from this unfathomable loss :(