In Corpus Christi, Texas last week, a mother was sentenced to five years probation and a $50 fine, and made to take parenting classes because she chose to spank her 2-year-old daughter. Some are outraged that her parental authority is being challenged, but I'm not convinced that was enough of a punishment.
While she didn't leave the child bruised or use any kind of object like a belt or yardstick, she did hit the child hard enough to leave red marks on her bottom. That's too hard. The girl's paternal grandmother noticed the marks and took her to the hospital where authorities were called.
I don't agree fully with the judge's reason for the ruling. He told Gonzalez, "You don't spank children today. In the old days, maybe we got spanked but that was a different world. You don't spank children -- you understand?"
While I personally don't believe in spanking children, and never have spanked my own, I also don't think the law should take that discipline technique away from parents. While plenty of experts believe the damage from any form of corporal punishment can be severe, there are others that say it can be effective when used correctly. Until there's a definitive answer, the decision to spank or not needs to be left up to parents, not judges ... unless it goes too far.
In this case -- or any case in which visible marks are made on a child's skin that last long enough to make it to a hospital -- that is not spanking, that's not discipline; it's abuse. If someone hit his wife hard enough to leave a red mark, it would be criminal, plain and simple. And it should be punished when it happens to children too, perhaps more severely than with just probation. The parenting classes she's being forced to take are a good addition.
Hopefully this ruling will send a strong enough message to this mom and all the other parents out there that if they chose spanking as a discipline technique, they need to use it with caution and care, not in the heat of a moment of anger. There's is a line between abuse and spanking, and if you're going to go anywhere near it, you need to be prepared not to cross it -- ever.
Do you think five years of probation was enough for this woman caught "spanking" her child?
Image via Ben Husmann/Flickr


This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
This Hot Dad Cooks AND Does the Dishes
Kanye West is Gay?!
















Comments 155
Thats too hard.
Anyone notice it was the mother in law (or ex for that matter), that took the child in? I wonder if anyone took in to consideration the revenge factor. I DO spank my children and I am very proud to say that I have 3 amazing children. Discipline is used when it is necessary, not as a means torture the child. Anything more than that I am not ok with. But for only a red mark to be left when the child was spanked?? I would think that the legal system would have better things to do then make a vengeful grandmother happy. Aren't there children being abused in foster systems and little brother being murdered by their big brothers?? This punishment is a joke!
My BIL beat me sister so bad that she ended up in the hospital and had to get a cat scan done on her b/c he beat her so bad on her head and he got NO punishment at all! She had to get a restaining order and even then he still harassed her at their own home and her work and she called the police over and over about it...they still didn't/won't do anything to him. That to me is considered a beating. A child who is spanked is not a beaten.
Part two of two:
Of course Texas CPS is almost certain to say there were other reasons for taking the children. But their track record, as seen in this post from our Child Welfare Blog, does not inspire one to take them at their word: http://bit.ly/iIv2yX
While it is true that "If someone hit his wife hard enough to leave a red mark, it would be criminal, plain and simple" if someone confined his wife to one room of the house for any length of time he chose, and forbid her to leave, that too would be criminal. So by that standard, we'd have to ban "time out," too. Though I'm personally opposed to spanking, banning it by law, even in a case like this one, based on what is known now, in the name of a foolish consistency is likely to have worse results for children.
The other issue, of course, is the judge making up his own law and imposing it on someone who almost certainly couldn't afford a good lawyer to fight back. Spanking is legal in Texas. Those who disagree should be working to persuade their legislators to change the law, not acting as vigilantes from the bench.
Richard Wexler
Executive Director
National Coalition for Child Protection Reform
www.nccpr.org