Picture this, parents. Your kid is pitching in a Little League game, and a bigger kid hits a line drive straight at him. Instead of ducking, he gets beaned in the head. So what do you do now?
Research the aluminum bats that were used by your kid's league, then talk to the league about getting them out of there? Talk to your kid about playing something safer, like maybe Wii baseball? Get the kid who hit the ball a hitting coach so he has better aim next time? Push for the league to make sure kids are pitted against kids of their own age and size?
Or sue the pants off the people who made the baseball bat? Ding, ding, ding!
Jake Schutter's parents have filed suit in federal court blaming Easton-Bell Sports, the maker of the bat used in the game, for their son's injuries including lifelong hearing loss. How original!
Hey, I'm not going to pretend metal bats are safe. Scientists have proven that the speed of a ball coming off an aluminum bat is faster than off of a wood bat. That added speed means a more dangerous impact when a ball makes contact with a player -- especially kids whose bodies are still developing. Jake Schutter is an unfortunate example of what can go wrong actually going wrong.
But bat makers don't manufacture the bats to make a ball hit a kid's head. They manufacture them to help people hit home runs. Leagues that allow kids to use the bats, however, are putting dangerous weapons in kids' hands for the sake of giving their teams an edge over the competition. And the Schutters' claim to CBS Chicago that "we wanted to do it so that it doesn’t happen to another kid" rings hollow.
Suing one bat company is going to yank some money out of corporate pockets and put it in the Schutters'. But it isn't going to do diddly when it comes to protecting other kids. What these families need to do is set aside their drive for dollars and go after the real morons here: the people putting dangerous bats in kids' hands.
When the Domalewski family decided to do that back in 2008 in New Jersey (they sued the seller of the bat and the league), it pushed the New Jersey legislature to consider abolishing all metal bat usage in youth games. It didn't succeed, but it was a start. Metal bat bans do happen. North Dakota and New York City have passed them; California debated one this year (they ultimately came up with a call for improved standards).
Suing the metal bat companies isn't going to put them out of business. Forcing leagues to stop buying them will. But that would mean parents have to give up on the money and do some real work.
Image via MelvinSchlubman/Flickr


Kim and Kanye's Baby Name Predictions!
Moms Love Birthday Parties, Too!
Father Knows Best - Happy Father's Day!
Are Cheaters Entitled to Privacy? - A...

















Comments 13
Yay! Why are people so sue happy? They are suing for their child getting hurt in a game that the child could get hurt in..... if they didn't want their child to get hurt, WHY LET HIM PLAY????
What's next, suing the city because little Johnny slipped on some mud at the play ground? This is so stupid...
This reminds me of the case where the lady who got burned by hot coffee & sued McDonald's. Maybe this family is angling for that status of the most ridiculous & greedy law suits
So sad, and ridiculous. Instead of spending their time and energy suing the bat company, which even if they win is going to do anything to discontinue the manufacturing of these bats, they should focus their efforts on lobbying for reform within the league, to possibly ban the use of these bats. However; this type of accident could have easily happened with a wooden bat if the kid hit it hard enough.
They should be awarded 3 bat swings to their heads. Sorry, but this is a frivolous lawsuit....they just want a paycheck....which is freaking ridiculous!
Unbelievable!!
People never stop amazing me. What will we think of next?