IVF, Multiples, and the Nadya Suleman Debate

5

IVF having multiplesIn vitro fertilization (or IVF) has drawn considerable attention recently thanks to Nadya Suleman, the controversial California woman who gave birth to octuplets conceived using IVF technology. She already had six children, also conceived through IVF, and she's come under fire for having so many kids as a single, unemployed mom who lives with her own mother. Many have wondered if she's being selfish. And now she's started a Web site seeking online donations for her brood.

The doctors who treated her have sparked ethical debate, too.

With those concerns in mind -- but also those of trying to conceive moms in general, because I know several who have turned to IVF -- I spoke to Dr. Shari Brasner, a Manhattan-based OB/GYN, fertility expert, and author of Advice from a Pregnant Obstetrician.

Here's what she had to say about IVF and the Suleman controversy.

The recent octuplet birth has put a spotlight on IVF and its potential consequences -- but for some trying to conceive women, it's something they may really have to consider at some point. What do women need to know about IVF and the possibility of conceiving multiples?

I think what women need to know about IVF is what it actually entails. Medications are used to stimulate the ovaries to produce more than their usual 'one-per-cycle'. The eggs are retrieved in a minor surgical procedure and are then fertilized by sperm. Any resulting embryos are then grown under careful scrutiny and decisions are made about how many and which ones to transfer into the uterus. Remaining embryos are often frozen.

Are couples/women too quick to jump to IVF these days?

Because success rates for IVF have been climbing and because it offers the best chance of success for women over 40, IVF is often recommended early or earlier in the process than years ago. Each decision should be made by women/couples under the supervision of a specialist.

What's your take on the octuplet birth and who, if anyone, is at "fault?"

I think the "system" failed in the recent octuplet birth. The goal too often is a positive pregnancy test rather than focusing on achieving a low risk pregnancy.

What are some natural, less invasive options for fertility treatments? And do these come with less risk for multiples?

There are a number of natural options available to boost fertility, including simple things like cutting caffeine and alcohol out of your diet and keeping a “conception calendar” so you know when you are ovulating.

One option I often prescribe my patients is the Conception Kit ($300, a prescription is necessary, but may be obtained online). It’s an at-home kit that is proven to be as effective as IUI and I like it because it’s all natural, doesn’t involve any drugs or surgery, and it doesn’t come with the increased risk of multiples.

To get more info on IVF and TTC from moms who are experiencing it, check out one of these groups (note that the first two are private):

In Vitro Fertilization Mommies

Trying to Conceive and Infertility

Trying to Get Pregnant!

If you're undergoing fertility treatments, are you concerned about the possibility of conceiving multiples? And what do you think about Nadya Suleman having 14 kids through IVF? Her choice, or reckless decision making?

in the news, trying to conceive, twins & multiples

5 Comments

To add a comment, please log in with

Use Your CafeMom Profile

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Comment As a Guest

Guest comments are moderated and will not appear immediately.

momof... momofsaee

Well, Yes, I do think it was irresponsible on her part, even if its her choice. These kids deserve more than $500 a mo food stamps and a 3 bedroom house. We only think about how to provide for them and how to make it all work, but the big picture is this....How do you teach these kids character, integrity, values, love, and committ yourself to raising them in a functional life? Forget the finances, what about their spirits? We tend to forget that they dont stay babies for very long. Teenagers require something that a lot of people just dont have. I feel for all of them. I really do.

outdo... outdoorzyones

i'm sorry this child herself wasn't raised with integrity. the dr. deserved to get sued, and his license revoked.  our hippocratic oath states "due no harm" harm was done and then some in this case.  you can bet your hat this was done for the attention, money, and status.   sick ppl. what is this world comming to when we feed into this managerie?hell i wouldn't give her a can of campbells! i would adopt a baby after all it's not the baby's fault her mother is a user.

Mommy... MommyBrunella

I hear she is obsessed with Angelina Jolie. What up with that?!

Marimaru Marimaru

I saw the dateline interview, and she claims she's not being selfish, but admits she wanted a big family to fill the whole she had from never having siblings.  She also said that she couldn't have let her embryos just sit there, which I understand, but they could have been donated or something.  She didn't need a 7th child, let alone another one.  It was rather amazing watching the interview, because she was up there to defend herself, but everything I heard her say just made it worse in my mind.  Especially when they got to the part where she already had an autistic child and 2 other children with 'undisclosed' disabilities.

nonmember avatar Celestial Dawn

I think this woman must have a mental illness. Why in the world would she put her own children at risk by having more? Kids deserve better. There is also such a very high rate of fetal death among multiples beyond triplets...why would she risk that rather than donate the resulting embryos? She needs serious psychological help! Rather than asking for monetary donations on a website, she should be asking for the free services of a psychiatrist and psychologist.

1-5 of 5 comments