Follow The Stir

Say What!?

The Case Against Having 19 Kids

by April Peveteaux on March 29, 2012 at 5:30 PM

overpopulationIn completely non-shocking news, Michelle Duggar does not believe in overpopulation. Along with other non-beliefs such as birth control and spending more than $25 for a haircut, Duggar says that "the idea of overpopulation is not accurate." Whatever that means. I'm not sure how an actual thing that exists can't be accurate, but logic isn't Michelle's strong suit. What is is making babies and she's going to keep on doing it because every baby is like a flower. Or something.

Listen, if that lady wants to keep beating up her uterus until it falls right out, that's her business. But she should at least recognize that more children do take up more resources, no matter how many hand-me-downs are worn. Those things have to be washed, do they not?

On the other side, you've got people who actually plan their family based on the potential carbon footprint. You know those people, right?

Before having children (obviously because after you have children, you kind of forget about all of this stuff), I've heard friends declare that they will only have one child, in consideration of the environment. I've also heard the "two children maximum" argument because by stopping at two, you've created replacements for yourself and your partner, and that's enough.

Yes, these people are generally from Berkeley, and they consider the environment before their own mothers, who would love to have some grandchildren before they're too old to enjoy them or, god forbid, dead.

While I do applaud the thought put into procreating in a responsible manner, I also know that I never consulted Al Gore when I got pregnant. I knew I couldn't handle a lot and, quite frankly, was skeptical about even having one child. That need trumped the need to keep disposable diapers out of the landfills, even though having only two children is somewhat helpful. But what's really helpful is knowing your limits. Not so much for the air quality, but for your quality of life.

The point being, we should be aware of our environmental impact whether through family planning, or reducing, reusing, and recycling. Which means, those Duggars better start walking and riding their bikes while carrying their food in their hands, if they want to stop being a huge drain on Mother Earth. And people that are more concerned about the environment than their own personal happiness might try to find a balance as well. Might I suggest a family of four that shops vintage and uses public transportation?

Did you consider the environment when planning your family?


Image via Arenamontanus/Flickr

Filed Under: trying to conceive, siblings

Comments

95
  • happy...
    --

    happynugget6

    March 29, 2012 at 5:46 PM
    I can't think of a single kind thing to say about this post
  • Tara
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Tara

    March 29, 2012 at 5:46 PM
    just finished rolling my eyes...
  • Cookie
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Cookie

    March 29, 2012 at 5:48 PM
    We are having one of our own and then we are going to adopt another child through the foster care system. We were considering the environment when we made our decision,
  • Desti...
    -- Facebook comment from

    Destiny Hall Lewis

    March 29, 2012 at 5:49 PM

    Well I can... While it wouldn't be my choice to live the way they do, if they continue to produce kids like theirs, I hope they have 19 more. More people should take lessons from the kind of parents they are.


  • jasmi...
    --

    jasmineg86

    March 29, 2012 at 5:58 PM

    while i think 19 is grossly irresponsible (my opinion) if you we are making the envirmental argument- what it takes to make, market, store and deliver birth control and condoms, then the hormones that are then let off in the water supply or refuse in landfill behind it... arent we (roughly) even for enviornmental impact?


  • cecil...
    --

    cecilmansmom

    March 29, 2012 at 6:12 PM

    wow you want the govenment out of your bedroom yet you want to be everyone else's? If they want 50 kids that's their business as long as their not wanting everyone else to pay for em


  • SwePea
    --

    SwePea

    March 29, 2012 at 6:24 PM
    They pay for their own kids so who cares!? Not everyone is having 19 kids. In many countries, the death toll exceeds birth rate. Then look at Germany. Last I read, there aren't enough working aged people to pay into social security but plenty of elderly collecting.
  • Yadie...
    --

    YadielsMama

    March 29, 2012 at 6:27 PM
    Wait! Let me go grab some popcorn!
  • zandh...
    --

    zandhmom2

    March 29, 2012 at 6:29 PM

    Blah, Blah, Blah...that's all I hear from this. 


  • i.hea...
    --

    i.heart.nerds

    March 29, 2012 at 6:33 PM
    You seriously need to stop writing before you hurt yourself.
    Many people are only having one child....that means that if that continues our country will drop in population....which means not enough workers to meet needs.
    If we all raised children like the Duggars this would be a much better world.
    Honestly, I would rather they have one hundred more children over one self righteous Berkeley person.
1-10 of 95 comments

To leave a comment, log in as a CafeMom member:

Log In

OR, use our non-member comment form: