Despite the unquestionable facts that inductions and c-sections should be avoided unless medically indicated, as they carry very significant risks not worth taking unless there is a real medical need, there are still many doctors -- and sadly, many moms -- who still take them lightly. We've all heard that 37 weeks is the start of a baby being full-term, but unfortunately, that leads to many women who see that number as their pregnancy 'end date' rather than their actual due date.
The number that medical professionals and now many hospitals want women to aim for as a bare minimum? It's 39 weeks.
And many hospitals have now put regulations in place preventing any form of induction or elective c-sections before that point.
Why 39 weeks? Well, take into account that your due date can be off by multiple weeks, and that ultrasound weight guesses can also be off by a few pounds. Babies born before 39 weeks gestation have higher rates of hearing and vision problems, respiratory distress, seizures, inability to suck and eat ... they also have significantly higher rates of death -- 50 percent higher, according to the March of Dimes. One-third of baby's brain growth happens between 35 and 39 weeks! Let's not forget, of course, that failed inductions cause major stress to mom and baby, and c-sections -- a major surgery -- have incredibly significant risks for both mom and baby, immediately and long-term, harder for a younger, less stable infant to handle as well.
A survey taken of over 650 first time moms resulted in a scary find -- over half thought delivering before 37 weeks was totally safe. And sadly, that trend is only perpetuated by doctor's arrogance and impatience as well. Dr. Ken Welch, who works at Banner Estrella Medical Center, a hospital that has banned elective procedures before 39 weeks, told ABC:
We became good at delivering babies before 39 weeks. Doctors were thinking if you can deliver at 39 weeks, why not 38 weeks or 36 weeks. We just had to draw the line in the sand [39 weeks] and say, because of the data, that we've become convinced we know it's healthier for the baby and we know the mother wants what's best for the baby.
Of course, I'm sure many of you all are thinking, "Yeah, more doctor and mother blame ... how many elective inductions or c-sections are REALLY done before then?" Well, many have c-sections or are induced way too early.
"Probably the biggest reason to deliver early, however, is to relieve the woman's physical discomfort," said Dr. Elizabeth Howell, who has been practicing at McKee, a Colorado hospital that has recently adopted the 39-week rule.
"I have seen women induced or have a scheduled c-section because they have family scheduled to be in town, because they want the baby to be born on an anniversary or someone else's birthday, because they want the baby born prior to January 1 for tax purposes, or because they are simply sick and tired of being pregnant," said Dr. Elaine St. John, associate professor of pediatrics in the Division of Neonatology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
While there are absolutely justifiable, needed inductions and c-sections, to deny that some people make selfish choices, or get so caught up in their discomfort that they really feel like they couldn't possibly survive another week of pregnancy (I know how THAT feels!), hospitals are making the right move. The hospitals who've had these policies have had extremely significant reductions in infants that need time in the NICU.
So, while some pregnant and miserable moms, or those who wanted to choose their baby's birthday might be irritated with not being allowed to induce or have a cesarean early, the baby's lifelong health is finally becoming the focus again, and I'm glad.
Did you try for or did your doctor try to convince you to have an induction or c-section before 39 weeks?
Image via Joe Lanman/Flickr
Exclusive 'Snow White & the Huntsman' Clip (VIDEO)
Arrest in Etan Patz Missing Child Case (VIDEO)
A Chilling Past Life Experience Recounted
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Memorial Day Survival Guide
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis

Comments (36)
nope!! I was induced on my due date with DS after being 3cm for a month.. and went into labor natuarlly at 39 weeks with DD.!!!!
I induced both mine at 39ish weeks and will do the same for the thrid.
I agree with this. I was induced by doctor order at 38 weeks due to preexisting diabetes. While I did have a vaginal delivery, I was on pitocin for almost 2 days, waters were broken by hand and open for more than 24 hours. I ended up on antibiotics because I'd gotten an infection from the water being broken so long and was running a fever of more than 102 when I delivered. I will NOT allow myself to be induced that early again. My body wasn't ready, and it was fighting the medicine every step of the way.
no i didnt ...i wanted my son to cook past 40 weeks ...was induced at 41 but with the next one i will not be doing the induction and letting it all happen naturaly
My first OB started pressuring me at 38 weeks, despite my making it clear I would not induce a healthy pregnancy for any reason. Since there were no medical reasons and she couldn't scare me with the 'possibiliy that she might be 10+ lbs" (my best friend was over 10lbs and her brothers 11 and nearly 12, so, no, that doesn't scare me one whit--especially since I knew she wasn't--and she wasn't, she was 8lbs, 7oz), I didn't induce and because I wouldn't let her bully me into it, she banned me from their practice for all future births. Nice, huh?
If this ban were enacted in my state, she would be a basket case--she wouldn't know what to do! She's such an impatient control freak--and certainly not alone. I've read even worse cases than her. We really need it here to control the number of OBs scheduling for their own convenience :( Because, more often than not, it's the OBs and not the mothers who are pressing for unnecessary inductions and cesareans.
I see midwives to avoid this type of stuff.
Not me...my sister's doc scheduled her c-section because baby was breech for 37.5 weeks...no indicators of her going into labor anytime soon, she just wasn't comfortable. Timing wise...my niece was born on December 29th...I don't think it was scheduled that way because of tax purposes, but I'm sure the doc didn't want his New Years' plans interrupted by having to possibly go deliver a baby. My two kiddos went to 40 weeks (went into labor on my own) and 42 weeks 6 days (induced because of low fluid). Doc says he won't even consider inducing until after 40 weeks with this new baby unless there's a true medical need to get baby out sooner.
Nope! I went labor naturally with my first... and after 3 days of on and off labor I had my water broken at 39 weeks 3days with my second one. I think this is great news and all hospitals should adopt this practice.
I will admit I was hoping my Dr.'s were going to schedule my elective c-section around 38 weeks. l selfishly wanted my pregnancy to be over. My Dr.'s scheduled mine after 39 weeks, 39.4 to be exact, and when I sheepishly asked them if we could do it earlier I was told "no" due to new hospital rules. Yes, I had to wait an extra week and few days, but in the long run I am glad I did. My little peanut was still only 6.2 lbs so I'm glad she got stay in there a little while longer.