I've heard pregnant women do some pretty crazy things over the years to get a breech baby to flip around in their bellies, all to avoid the dreaded C-section. Ahem, burning mugwort, anyone? But ladies, it seems all that craziness may have been completely unnecessary.
Are you sitting down? Because after years of bullying mamas into believing that we must, we must, we must let them bust open our bellies if baby is butt down, the OB/GYNs are saying "oops, my bad, we may have over-reacted a tad bit." Guidelines released by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada say vaginal delivery of a baby that's descending feet- or butt-first (rather than head-first) is actually ... safe.
Sitting here today, I can't help wondering what the women who did it for centuries before the ol' hacksaw across the belly trick came along would say to these guidelines? "Well, DUH, we could have told you that in 1815? 1705? 1653?"
The fact is, the evidence was there in the form of centuries of babies, and yet women have been forced into C-sections by scalpel-happy, malpractice-shy doctors for decades. Our own feelings, common sense, and historical evidence haven't played into the decisions at all. But I look at the crazy things women do (I say crazy in the sense of how far women go, not crazy in the judgmental sense) to "flip" their breech babies, and I see women who are resolute in their mission to avoid a C-section.
We're crying out in our actions for our caregivers to listen to us, to hear that we don't want unnecessary C-sections, and that everything should be done to avoid them. And yet I know women who were told by their OB/GYNs that they were scheduling a C-section for a breech baby a full month before their due date, despite evidence that most babies will flip in the meantime (only 5 percent are actually born breech). Caregivers are too pushy. Mothers don't always have the power to push back. We're tied by insurance companies. By state regulations over homebirths in some states. By a system that needs changing.
But if American pregnant women are willing to burn mugwort to flip their babies to avoid a C-section, I'm willing to bet they'll fight to bring these Canadian guidelines to America. Is this a victory we can bring to America? Did you deliver a breech baby? How?
Image via isafmedia/Flickr


Ashley Is a Widow Who Stays Strong...
This Hot Dad Wants to Vacuum Your Rug
This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
















Comments 115
It's articles like this that make me feel that the majority of women look down on women who have had C-Sections. I labored for 26 hours (with 4 hours of sleep before I had to be gasp induced at 10 days overdue), and that whole time I only progressed to 7cm.
My point is, the doctors aren't out there to "ruin" your birth plan, they are there for the safety of you and the child. They're the ones with the degree, so maybe following their lead isn't such a bad idea?
i agree with katie... there are different reasons to have a c-section and women should stop judging other mothers.
my son was breech and had to be taken emregency c-section due to me being only 25wks, and he was in distress, if i had had him vag he more than likely would not have survived.
i trusted my drs they know more about it than i do.
THANK YOU KATIE! AMEN. Seriously. I had two C-Sections, I know I know, I guess I just didn't TRY HARD ENOUGH after 17 hours of excrutiating labor where not only did my child go into obvious distress- OBVIOUS- as is his heartbeat began wavering and went down so much that the doctors stormed into my labor and delivery room and began shoving things on me, in me, etc, that I FREAKED- that I told them I was done. DONE. Wanted a section immediately to have my child out. WTF is so wrong with that?? Because we are "supposed" to give birth naturally?! As mothers our jobs and instincts are immediately to protect and defend our child, including getting them out as healthy and safely as possible and for me, this neccesistated a section both times. So what? They are both healthy and perfect.
I agree with Katie on this one!
mothers are constantly judged and the sad part is, we are judged by other mothers the people we should be able to go to for advice if needed. its never ending!induced or wait, vaginal birth or c-section, pain meds or natural, breast or formula, circ or not, co-sleep or not to, let them cry it out or not to let them, whos business is it??? if your child is happy healthy and growing. thats all that matters!!!
Thank YOU MadelynMC for being the voice of reason. Noone is judging anyone. If you WANT that c-section, by all means, have one (although I personally will never understand a voluntary one. before anyone jumps down my throat, when your lives are truly in danger, that's obviously not a voluntary c-section and your situation irrelevant to my comment). That's your business. But believe it or not, there are women out there who don't want c-sections and are bullied into them.
Kudos to Canada! Lets bring that common sense to the US and turn around the joke that is maternity care in this country.
I wasn't pressured into a c-section. my daughter pooped in inside the womb and I wasn't dilating very much at all. with every minute that passed she was more and more at risk for having respiratory problems so I made the decision of having a c-section. that does not make me a bad person or make my OB a bad doctor.