It's the story of a pregnant woman who did all the right things for her baby. She followed doctors' orders. She went on bed rest for more than a month, first at home and then in a hospital bed. But Matt Logelin's new book, Two Kisses for Maddy, wouldn't exist if it weren't for the way Liz Logelin's body betrayed her. She gave up everything for their baby girl, even her life.
Liz Logelin died 27 hours after she gave birth. And it wasn't in a rural hospital in a third world country. She wasn't an older mom, well past her childbearing years and pushing the limits of science. She was 30, in a respected California hospital. But just over a month of bed rest -- a common medical practice in American pregnancies -- claimed her life.
Liz died of a pulmonary embolism as she was getting up for the first time since her bed rest began, hoping to walk down the hall to the NICU to see daughter Madeline for the first time since she was born via C-section, seven weeks early but surprisingly healthy. Her story and that of her widower Matt and daughter Maddy has become a touchstone for the grieving as Matt has blogged about single parenthood in the wake of loss since experiencing life and death in the span of just two days in March 2008.
And now it's a book, Two Kisses for Maddy, a book that's at once horrifying to comprehend and haunting as Matt learns to live for his daughter. It's being touted as a love story from father to daughter, and indeed it is. Sent as a review copy to The Stir by the publishers, I devoured it in one day, unable to detach from the story of a little girl growing physically as her father grew emotionally. Logelin is a writer who imbues tragedy with humor, the written word with an emotion that travels out of the page and up the arm to the heart.
But I couldn't help focusing on the love story of a mother and a child from which it sprang. As pregnant women, we all give up little things for our babies. Our glass of wine with dinner, our favorite soft cheese, our figures, our breasts. Liz Logelin, on the other hand, gave the ultimate sacrifice for her child. She took to bed because low amniotic fluid put Madeline at risk, and she stayed there for five weeks, while a clot unknowingly formed and later moved up to the lungs, cutting off oxygen-rich blood and snuffing out her young life.
Bed rest is so common that an estimated 700,000 (about one in five) women will be prescribed it during pregnancy. Traditionally, women hear about the smaller sacrifices this entails -- discomfort, emotional distress, being forced to use up maternity leave time they'd prefer to save for after baby comes. But as Logelin's book lands on The New York Times bestseller list, the story of a father's love should turn on a light bulb for the hundreds of thousands of women sent to bed this year as they wait for baby to arrive. It's rare, but this so-called medical advancement that's meant to protect a baby can kill you.
In fact the most common cause of pulmonary embolism is a blood clot, often brought on by extended bed rest. It's the most extreme of the bed rest risks, which also include decreased bone mass, cardiovascular and muscular deconditioning, increased chance of urinary tract infection, constipation, loss of range of motion in the joints, and depression. These are the warnings that the stories of "how to keep yourself occupied during your bed rest" don't tell you. These are the warnings that mothers need to know.
Not to be scared but to be empowered, to be prepared. I'm pretty sure most moms when reading Matt Logelin's book will say they would have done what Liz Logelin did, would give up everything for the sake of the person growing inside of them. Matt Logelin's love story to his wife and to his daughter has given other women a chance to plan ahead, to plan for the "what if," to help their significant others in the case that theirs is one of those rare sad stories of bed rest gone wrong, to give once again to their children.
Did you have to go on bed rest during pregnancy? Did you know about the risks?
Image via Matt Logelin
Exclusive 'Snow White & the Huntsman' Clip (VIDEO)
Arrest in Etan Patz Missing Child Case (VIDEO)
A Chilling Past Life Experience Recounted
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Memorial Day Survival Guide
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis

Comments (14)
I was on bed rest for 9 weeks with my son. I was allowed up for 5 minutes twice a week for a shower. I have IC.
I was well of the risk of Pulmonary Embolism. Physical therapy came in to teach me exercises for my arms and legs to keep the blood flowing, I wore compression sock all the time also. I read about it and knew it could happen. And for the miracle of my son born at 27 weeks and surprising healthy, I would do it all over again.
I was on bed rest at the hospital for 3 1/2 weeks due to low amniotic fluid. I was allowed up for about 5 minutes a day to shower, and to use the restroom several times (very briefly). The rest of the time, I was completely motionless in bed from the waist down. I was aware of the risk of blood clots, and the doctors had me hooked up to a machine that 'massaged' and lifted my legs up and back down again, to help prevent blood clots. I don't know how much those machines help, but I wonder if she had a machine if perhaps she would still be here. I think doctors should take the risk of blood clotting on bed rest seriously, and try their best to prevent it, instead of just 'hoping it doesn't happen' to their patient. With modern medical technology, there is no reason why tragedies like this should have to happen.
Like you said in the article, this is an EXTREME side affect or risk of bed rest. All in all, if a doctor prescribes bed rest, I am under the assumption it is for a reason, and is the best thing for you. I think it's wildly unfair to say that the "bed rest killed her". Perhaps her daughter WAS born healthy because of her bed rest. Obviously it's a terrible tragedy and heartbreaking, honestly- but pulmonary embolisms happen to people who aren't on bed rest, too. It's just a huge, tragic, horrible circumstance, but I wouldn't blame bed rest. I had the opposite problem with my last pregnancy- too much fluid, also known as polihydramnios (probably mispelled) & was also on half bed rest, half light duty. It sucked, especially with a toddler, but my daughter is healthy. That's all that matters.
I think the title of this article is dangerously misleading, just an FYI.
The title is something Jeanne Sager always seems to do. Put a eye-catching title to get a knee-jerk response. Most of the time if i've read a particularly silly or inflammatory article, shes written it.
I was on bedrest for preeclampsia. Yes there is a risk of blood clots, but the risk of severe complications to me and my baby without bedrest would have been greater.
How heartbreaking for this family! I was on bedrest with my middle child- I had borderline placenta previa and the placenta separated from the wall of the uterus. When I did any sort of physical activity, even just walking around, the placenta would separate more and I would bleed heavily. At 15 weeks, there were no options for the baby other than for me to go on bedrest and hope for the placenta to move up and out of the way. Fortunately by my 20 week u/s the placenta had moved high enough that it was no longer on the cervix and I was able to resume more normal activities (still pelvic rest and no lifting, but I was able to get out of bed.) Yes, I was told there was a risk of deep venous thrombosis. Yes, I considered the risk worthwhile.
I was on bedrest for a month after going into preterm labor at 20 weeks(where I did a week of bedrest and then when I became more active the labor came back so back to bed) My son was born at a nice 37 weeks due to no ambiotic fluid. If I hadn't chosen the c-section he wouldn't be here the same as if I hadn't done bedrest he probably would not be here. I would spend 9 months in bed if it meant saving my baby.
I agree that this is a horriblly misleading tittle.