If there's one discussion you can understand a pregnant woman procrastinating on, it's circumcision. Being a woman, you're darned if you do and darned if you don't.
We don't have penises. We were never circumcised (hopefully). And that makes us complete hypocrites when we speak up on the issue.
If you know you're having a boy, or you're opting to be surprised by "who" comes out on delivery day, waiting to have the foreskin fight could turn you and your significant other into the infamous couple who had the first knock-down drag-out in your hospital's delivery ward.
Don't be that couple. Let Dad decide.
What, you can't believe what you just read? An empowered woman and mother ceding control of a major moment in her child's life to a man?
Let me say it again. Women can only know so much about this issue. I read authoritative sources about circumcision while I was pregnant with my "surprise gender" child. I was interested, engaged, and involved: everything that makes a good parent-to-be. And during that time, with the mystery hanging over our head, we should have been having in-depth talks about the procedure that we had a 50/50 chance of facing.
And yet, I couldn't bring it up. I talked about breastfeeding, spanking, even the dark possibility of death during childbirth and what I'd like to see happen.
I consider us supremely lucky -- on a number of levels -- that the child who came out of me was a little girl. Having that conversation suddenly after 13 hours of labor would not have gone over well. Bless my gentle Southern husband, he would have been unwilling to make a decision without my input. Which would have instantly set off my crab-o-meter because, gosh darnit, I make a lot of hard decisions for our child. It wouldn't hurt to let him make one of the big ones once in awhile.
I made the heart-wrenching decision to stop breastfeeding to seek treatment for my postpartum depression. I chose our pediatrician and took her on her nursery school visit. My husband weighed in on all of them, but in the end, the decision was mine for the simple reason that he trusted me to make the best decision for our child.
If we trust this person enough to procreate with them, we should be able to trust them with big decisions. That's part of parenting -- determining that your partner has a say in raising a child, and allowing them to play off their own strengths in doing so.
In the case of circumcision, men don't just have the penis -- circumcised or not. They have experience with the big issues: health, cleaning it, standing in a locker room, revealing it during sexual encounters. If they're against it, they have personal experience that says, "Whoa, Nelly, this is not something we want done to our little boy." On the other hand, if he's OK with it going forward, by all means, he's got the know-how to say this won't damage the goods for ... good.
I can't tell you what we would have done if we'd had a son instead of a daughter. I certainly wouldn't tell you what to do with your little boy.
But you can read thousands of pages on the Internet or you can trust the true expert: the man standing beside you. Let him have his say.
Image via Phil_Parker/Flickr


This Hot Dad Wants to Vacuum Your Rug
This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
















Comments 124
I will let the owner of the penis decide for himself. This post disgusts me
WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP.
that is all.
What about when your husband is a cheater. Like, CHEATER kind of cheater? I'm divorcing my husband, and am about to have a son. When I asked him many many months ago about the issue before we even knew the gender, he said he wanted it done.
My point is, the "man" can't even make good decisions reguarding his own penis, so why should I leave the decision about our son up to him?
I plan on leaving my son intact.
My husband and I both decided. if we are having another boy im sure he will be circumcision as well
It's not dad's penis either. And how can a man who doesn't have a foreskin be a judge any more accurately than a woman? The only person whose decision it is to make is the person to whom the foreskin belongs to. It's a cosmetic procedure. Ask the men also who were circumcised and work really hard to have their foreskin restored.
The vast majority of infection seen in the intact young males are a direct result of messing with the foreskin (pulling it back fore it does on its own) and over care (applying irritants just like douching and too many bubble baths causes issues with women). The vagina is nor more a den of infection than the foreskin. It's attitudes and knowledge that make the difference.
Most of the men in the world are intact and they are not an infection waiting to happen.
I don't feel like arguing whether one should or should not circumcise right now but the thought of just handing over a surgical, potentially deadly, decision to someone concerning my child... NO.
I'm so glad we're having girls - but if we weren't and there was a disagreement I would defer to the dad. I think it's a little funny that some of us can't discuss differences of opinion without resorting to insults. Hmmm, is that how you settle arguments with the hubby? It's more interesting to me to see how couples resolve these differences than who is an intactivist and who isn't.
Ok after reading all those comments below I'm ready to decide what I believe. I think if both parents are in agreement to one yes or no... then do it, whatever it is. But if one parent is not comfy doing it or not then let the child decide when he is older.