Have you ever heard of a "hostile fetus"? No? Neither have I.
Jammie Harms, an Omaha, Nebraska, woman has, though.
She is suing her former boss, accusing him of calling her unborn child hostile and suggesting that the fetus inside her had a "negative agenda" before he fired her.
I have had some crazy bosses in my day, but this guy may take the cake.
According to Harms claim, Hearthstone Homes CEO John Smith, for whom Harms worked as an executive assistant, felt he was spiritually connected to her fetus and it "was creating a negative energy in the work place"
According to Hearthstone Homes? It was part of a 40 percent staff reduction, not because of the hostility of the fetus.
My money? It's on the mommy. And here's why:
- How could anyone make this up?
- Other employees insist CEO Smith and other company leaders forced workers to attend Mind, Body, and Energy sessions, or MBE, a practice the company describes as holistic and good for their business.
- Even the Vice President in charge of cleaning up the PR mess this lawsuit has created will not fully call Harms a liar.
According to Action 3 News:
"Did it happen?" Neil Smith answers, "I think those specific questions will be answered through the course of the lawsuit." I ask, "So, you can't tell me if he did say that?" "No," Smith responds. "So there is a possibility that he did say that?" I ask. "I suppose, there's also a possibility he didn't say that."
If what Harms says is true and this man did call her fetus "hostile," then she deserves something for her lawsuit because that is just plain insane and abusive.
I have had two fetuses kick me from the inside in a rather dramatic fashion. I have even had them wedge themselves in my ribs and headbutt my cervix, but hostile? No. That's a new one.
What do you think of this?
Image via mostaque/Flickr
Do People Who Have Kids Deserve Special Treatment?
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Memorial Day Survival Guide
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis

Comments (11)
How is it "abusive" to have somebody call your unborn child hostile? Really - these lawsuits that are based on hurt feelings are getting out of control. If some loose screw insults me, I shake it off - even in the workplace, even from a boss (and yes, I've been there).
If she was terminated because she's pregnant, then yes, she deserves to be compensated. If she was let go as part of a workplace reduction, then I don't feel she's been wronged in any way, even if her boss was a loon.
I read another article on this and other people have said they were calling psychics in staff meetings and doing other bizarre things. I think, regardless of being pregnant, I would have looked for a new job as soon as I realized my boss was a wack job.
i agree. some people will say ridiculous things to you while you're pregnant. if she got fired because of staff reduction then she probably used this as an excuse for money. people get insulted all the time. they don't sue. sounds like she worked for a nutter and should be happy she got fired.
The termination is what's abusive, hoticed.
jeannesager - how is it abusive to be terminated?
When you're terminated for unjust causes, it's abuse.
are you kidding? How is it absive to be terminated for having a "hostile fetus"?
This is getting funny. When you're terminated for an unjust cause, it's 'wrongful termination', not abuse, jeannesager. And it's unclear if she was wrongfully terminated, or just let go as part of downsizing. Either way, I would think she'd be clicking her heels all the way to the unemployment office, happy to be out of the Cuckoo's Nest, instead of suing because she's been told she's carrying Rosemary's Baby.