
Photo from Splash News
The next natural reaction after shock, happiness, and wonder at reports that John Travolta's 47-year-old wife Kelly Preston is three months pregnant, assuming it really is true, is to ask a slew of big questions, the first of which is:
What is the chance a 47-year-old could even get pregnant!?
Women over 45 can and do, of course. There were 7,666 live births to women 45 to 54 in 2008 in the United States alone, and just days ago, news that a 54-year-old Italian woman who thought she was going through menopause discovered she had conceived naturally.
But that's really not a lot. No one has to tell us how rare it truly is, and that the odds of getting pregnant in your early 40s, let alone your late 40s, is difficult enough.
Women over 40 have just a 5 percent chance of getting pregnant each month -- and that includes both the natural way and through assisted reproduction, including artificial insemination and with in-vitro fertilization, according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
They don't even track the stats for women over 45,but you can bet the chance of pregnancy dwindles even more.
So Preston really did defy the odds. Awesome for her. She gives so many other women hope. But the second big question with an older pregnancy is ...
What about birth defects?
Many moms have been through the horror of genetic blood testing and ultrasounds when the doctor gives the obligatory rundown of odds of Down syndrome and other chromosomal abnormalities based on the mother's age.
When I got pregnant with my children in my 30s, the risk of my baby being born with Down syndrome was 1 in 378 and 1 in 192 for Down and all other chromosomal problems lumped together. Those didn't sound like great odds to me. At all. I worried a lot, especially when I learned how much better it would have been had I conceived in my 20s: 1 in 1,250 for Down and 1 in 476 total chromosomal.
When Sarah Palin, another notable over-40 mom, got pregnant with son Trig at age 43, her risk of a Down syndrome baby was 1 in 49 and 1 in 43 total. Trig was born with Down syndrome.
IVF may help to control some abnormalities before implantation -- at Preston's age of 47, the risk of those kinds of birth defects rises to 1 in 18 and 1 in 14!
There's a very good chance Preston used an egg donor, an option that many other women choose to avoid the possibility of a baby born with birth defects. There really are so many variables, and until the Travolta-Prestons tell us more, all we can do is speculate.
Because the eggs of older women are less likely to develop, someone Preston's age is also more likely to miscarry -- a 53 percent chance of what is referred to as a spontaneous abortion -- than, say, a woman in her 20s to mid-30s who has a 10-12 percent chance.
This is not meant to be a downer, but an important reminder of how much harder it is to be a mom at an older age. I hope more than anything that Preston continues to defy all the odds and enjoys a complication-free pregnancy ending with a healthy and thriving baby. After all they've been through in the last year, she and her family deserve it.
Are you an older mom? Are you worried about the increased risks?


This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
This Hot Dad Cooks AND Does the Dishes
















Comments 28
It's a donor's egg AND fertility treatments. It's almost statiscally impossible that it's Preston's egg.
Society is so damn mean when it comes to older moms. it is o.k. when older women are raising kids as foster moms and grandmothers, but the very idea of raising a child that slipped out of her virgina is somehow frowned upon. Your comments were just mean. With a fake attempt to be polite. I know too many naturally conceived menopause babies born to women from 42-45 who were healthy and beautiful! Please let her have this moment. Your digging up negative statistics show your real prejudice.
Who cares?! This is a magical joyous time for them. However their child was concieved is their business. Not yours.
Cynthia - Did you know although the probability increases with maternal age, 80% of children with Down syndrome are born to women under the age of 35? With that being said, as a fellow infertility patient, a mother via egg donation, and a first time mother over the age of 35 I guess I want to ask you "Why are you even writing about this?" What right do you Cynthia or anyone else for that matter to request or expect that the Travolta's or to tell us more about this pregnancy? No one is asking you about your reproductive life. Don't you think this is a personal matter and instead of writing about this kind of stuff, we should be respecting the sanctity of their married and their right to privacy?
I mean come on its bad enough that public figures, celebrities, or those in public service feel like they have to address personal issues to avoid speculation about their life. Nevertheless, when we expect personal details of health issues or how a couple conceived their children that is just in poor taste in my book. No one is entitled to that information. And I am sure as hell not going to be asking those I know who got on top, or what Kama sutra position during what phase of the moon, and what love music they were listening to while they were trying to conceive. I for one am really happy for the Travolta's. They have been through holy hell, deserve some joy, and well earned privacy.
IVF, unfortunately, is an immoral option. Children are conceived in a petri dish on a scientists lab, whereas they have the right to be born in their parents loving embrace. The children who are a product of this type of conception (IVF) are still very much valuable and loved, but the act of the parents is not moral. On top of this, very frequently, embryos are destroyed during IVF.
My first pregnacy occured when I was 42 - no fertility just acupuncture. Luckily everything went perfectly and we have a healthy baby boy. Now at 44 years old I am once again pregnant naturally only with the assistance of acupuncture treatments. So far things have gone well but my CVS results won't be in for another week putting us in the clear for things like Downs Syndrome. We are very aware of how lucky we are for beating the odds to get pregnant twice in my 40s... just praying for a good result once again. So I do believe Kelly could beat the odds but it is typical for people (especially other women trying to concieve) to question it because the odds do not typically support this happening naturally.
This comment is to Phil, I'm an embryologist .. I am that scientist .. I appreciate everyone's right to their own opinion, and I appreciate that YOU FEEL it is immoral .. I don't appreciate you stating it as if it were a FACT and not just YOUR OPINION .. also .. if you feel it is so immoral, please consider cancer patients who without IVF would never feel that "loving embrace of a child" without IVF .. the same would go for many other diseases as well .. Also .. please educate yourself .. not all IVF labs destroy embryos .. it's actually illegal in some states and countries.
AS TO IMPOSSIBLE,,,,,
I am 45 this august, I have 5 kids the oldest is 24 the youngest 5 months old. FYI I cant afford IVF or donner eggs... I used nothing but plain ol' fashioned sex and my own (old) eggs and my 3 year old daughter and 5 month old son are healthy as my 24 year old.... All things thru God are possible.... Never believe in the cant's.... Best wishes to them both as the Downs and miscarry rate is a bit high, but so worth it... My chances for downs was like 1-14 and my kids are not Downs at all....
Carina - Thanks for giving me hope. I am 44. My beautiful naturally conceived daughter just turned three. We are trying so hard for a sibling, but no luck yet. ... To any who are negative about the Kelly Preston/Travolta pregnancy, please be kinder. Babies are precious. I wish the Travolta/Preston family a healthy happy little bundle of joy.
I actually don't care if they are IVF or not. I couldn't be happier for someone pursuing the family they desire (well, except for someone like 8xmom who is plain crazy). As for the risks, I'm sure they are quite capable of dealing with whatever unique characteristics their child(ren) have.