Brandi Glanville is not exactly known for being soft-spoken and diplomatic, and this is what we appreciate about her. The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star always has some choice things to say, and this time she gets murderous. Yep, this time she actually admits to wanting to kill or seriously harm singer LeAnn Rimes, who had an affair with her husband, Eddie Cibrian.
It happened when Brandi saw LeAnn, who ended up marrying Eddie, sitting with Brandi's children at a soccer game. This is gonna be good, right?
Said Brandi:
I remember walking up to soccer practice and there she was with my baby in her lap. My blood was boiling, and I thought I was going to kill her. I really thought I was going to physically hurt her.
Yikes, I wonder if it was at the soccer game pictured above that Brandi was having her homicidal thoughts? LeAnn appears oblivious that her life might be in danger. Anyway, is there anyone who can't relate to what Brandi was feeling? She has two kids with Eddie. And now she has to share them with her husband's mistress, who is now his wife? It's the mature thing to do, but ... who wouldn't want to hurt? Or even kill?
Adds the former model:
... that was the first time I saw her that way -- she was sitting in my soccer chair, under my tent, she's got my kid on her lap and she's with my husband, and that was that little moment of total irrational fury.
Irrational? Sounds perfectly rational, if you ask me. It is totally rational to want to kill your husband's mistress.
You just can't DO it. Obvs. Because then you go to jail, and the cheating husband and his mistress get custody of the kids. Plus, killing is wrong, blah blah. But to want to do it, to think about it doing it for just a split second (or a wee bit longer)? Per-fect-ly normal.
Have you ever wanted to kill a rival?
Image via Pacific Coast News


This Hot Dad Wants to Vacuum Your Rug
This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
















Comments 14
I COMPLETELY understand how she feels. Initially, I wanted to somehow LEGALLY limit her contact with my kids but, realizing that it would effectively put up a barrier between HIM and the kids, I gave up that ghost. Things have been fairly calm since the initial storm until very recently, when, despite a prior agreement between he and I, the girlfriend-nee-mistress sat in the front pew at my son's First Holy Communion, in the Church where we are still "technically" married and relegated my son's grandmother to a seat nearer the back of the Church. Homicidal thoughts made worse by the fact that I was having them on such a special day and in CHURCH. Grrrrr.
@Emme - I can't speak for everyone but I can say that, for me, I HAVE TO maintain a relationship with the father of my children. I do not HAVE TO do anything but hold my tongue with regard to the woman 10 years his junior who actively pursued him and sought to distance himself from his wife and kids - eventually with his absolute cooperation, no doubt - despite having been a guest in our home at MY invitation (yes, I kick myself all of the time for it...) and knowing perfectly well EXACTLY what she was doing. Because I HAVE TO have a relationship with him for at least 12-15 more years because of our very small people, she bears the brunt of my anger, sadness and disappointment, absolutely. Is that fair? Maybe not. But she's not entitled to fair so, too bad.
Leanne is a nasty slut. I have NO respect for women who sleep with MARRIED men.
Bitch can't even sing.
I have to second the opinion about directing ire at the "other person", and not at the cheating spouse. The spouse is the one in the relationship - and likely, there are serious problems within that relationship for it to come to a place where one (or both) partners feel able to cheat, or even justified in it. And yet, the ire is almost always directed at the outsider who "pursued" the [completely innocent, helpless, and clueless] cheating spouse.
That said, yes, I have felt jealousy toward another woman. Never strong enough to consider any kind of physical contact, but yes, I've been jealous. Fortunately, it was a fleeting feeling, and my boyfriend/spouse took it as the compliment it was, rather than as the catty emotion it could have become.
As a sidebar, although it's been a long while since we've seen Leann-bashing posts, I'm sick of reading them here. Especially since this site seems to idolize Tori Spelling who did almost exactly the same thing, except that she went on to have children with the man she "stole", and Leann has not.
No, Guest. Leann does bear responsibility. But there is this need (particularly in spouses) to blame the "interloper" and completely absolve the married partner.
Leann, or any other third party, would never have been allowed into Eddie's life in the first place if he'd have been satisfied in his marriage. He has just as much ability to say "Thanks for finding me attractive, but I'm married", as Leann did to say, "Hey, baby, you're cute. Come sleep with me."
I'm not absolving her of responsibility. I'm finding fault with those who blame her, and only her, for the destruction of the Eddie/Brandi marriage. And, by extension, for those who blame the "other man/woman" for the destruction of a regular (non-celeb) marriage. Again, if the spouses were secure in the relationship, a third party making advances would be rebuffed, and the marriage would remain strong.