As the circumcision debate rolls on and on in parenting forums on the Interwebs, there is one realm in which many women seem to absolutely favor the snip: the bedroom. Yes, I am sorry to say that no matter what the parenting forums say, little Johnny is much more likely to have a girl want to go down if the area is clean and cut, especially if she is American.
How do I know this? In the past couple weeks, I have conducted a highly unscientific poll among close to 50 women I know, all of whom have been with circumcised and uncircumcised men. And the results were a bit surprising.
I will admit when it came time to make this decision for my own child, we asked around and got a lot of answers from women who had been traumatized by uncircumcised penises that were, to put it nicely, "unclean."
Now, of course, a woman can ask the dude to shower and take care of that little stank issue, but the truth is: "It's common for the partner(s) of uncircumcised men to notice a distinct odor or taste when coming in close contact with the penis and foreskin," according to Go Ask Alice. It isn't an insurmountable issue for most couples, of course. And once it's inside, most women can't feel a difference. Still, the overwhelming consensus from women seemed to be that it was just less clean and grossed them out.
"It was ugly," one friend who asked to remain anonymous said of her uncircumcised former boyfriend. "It looked like a Shar-Pei puppy," said another. You get the drift.
Now, of course, most parents don't make the decision to snip based on the likelihood of future blow jobs for their baby boy. As circumcision rates decline more and more in the States, it likely will be the "norm" to have sexual encounters with uncut men. Still, the women who have been with both seem to prefer the cleaner look of a cut penis.
Of course, some women said that there were benefits to the uncut male, too. One woman whose husband is uncircumcised and who asked to remain anonymous (natch) said her husband could last a much longer time and he had the sense, from college conversations, that this was due to his intact penis. Several also said that the penis felt no different in the dark. The revulsion was really more of a sensory thing -- taste, smell, and sight -- than it was a sexual thing.
Times are changing and maybe in 30 years, women will look with disgust on a cut head and wonder why on Earth anyone would do such a thing. But that time isn't now and for most of the roughly 50 women I heard from, aesthetically speaking, a cut penis wins every time.
Have you had sex with both? Do you have a preference?
Image via James Bowe/Flickr


This Hot Dad Wants to Vacuum Your Rug
This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
















Comments 115
" i didnt think we were qualified to show them hoe to take meticulous care of a foreskin."
....Meticulous care? My son is not circumcised. Do you know how to clean a young boy's intact penis? Wipe it like a finger. You don't pull it down to clean (that causes infection) until it retracts on its own , much much later when your son should be cleaning himself anyway. It's not that difficult. It's disappointing that people think men aren't capable of caring for their own genitals. We teach our daughters how to correctly wipe and clean so as not to cause problems, it is not so complex to do the same for our boys. That argument is unfounded.
I would believe my argument was unfounded if nobody ever said that uncircumsized penises don't smell as long as they are cared for properly. However, I hear that all the time, even in this thread. This suggests there is a proper way to care for them, and if not done properly they will stink. So that said, how can someone who has never seen one know how to take care of them properly? Also, if they are not kept meticulously clean, I have read there is a greater chance of infections. Now I understand this is not the case with infants, but boys do not stay babies forever, and I was uncomforable with the idea of advertising for an uncirced man to come drop trou and show my boys how it's done. I don't think it is mutilation, it has proven health benefits, and I am comfortable with my decision. I was merely adding other arguments my husband and I discussed while making this decision. It was not a kneejerk decision on my part. I did reading, light research and we considered carefully. I know that anti-circers think that anyone who thinks carefully will not circ or they are evil monsters who deserve prison, but I don't think that is the case.
"I don't think it is mutilation, it has proven health benefits, and I am comfortable with my decision."
It is indeed mutilation. It fits the definition.
Mutilate: to cut up, destroy, or alter radically - in the case of circumcision, the foreskin is cut up/destroyed, and the man's penis is radically altered from its natural state;
Mutilation: an injury that causes disfigurement or that deprives you of a limb or other important body part - in the case of circumcision, the penis is disfigured from its natural state, it has been partially amputated, and it will never have its full functionality, as nature intended.
And oh yeah - the 'proven health benefits' are bogus. No medical organization in the world recommends routine infant circ.
"It's not that difficult."
True. In fact, it's harder to keep a little girl clean down there, what with all the folds of skin. But we don't go around cutting off part of their genitalia with such an excuse.
"The article is deeply flawed and the author is ill-informed."
Yes, and it's an unfortunate fact that many of her fellow Americans are as well. Fortunately, that is changing. But it can't happen soon enough. This is yet another reason why a ban should be put in place to protect boys from this needless cutting. Girls are protected from this atrocity, and yet girls are not. This is unconstitutional.
I love my husband who is circumcised but he's lost a lot of feeling. For him to finish he has to thrust hard and fast. It's like having sex with a battering ram. It's no fun. :(
I am not against circumcision. I understand the debate...however...many of you are so set against it and insist your "research" is the only right research. Sometimes there are two sides. Some ways are infact positive on both sides. I do not feel as though I am mutiliating my child if I choose to circumsize him as a newborn. I have never heard any man i know say they are unhappy or upset about circumcision. As a matter of fact no man i know would choose to not circumsize. FYI...you are all very opinionated and insisting you are correct based on whatever internet research you have found is all well and good...but insisting that others research is inadequate is just stupid. Most of you are stupid.
Oh and btw you can always find a website to support your opinions...but good research..