There is not much I would not rather do than watch football. Truly, I would rather wash dishes, fold laundry, do push-ups (not the girl kind) or eat fried scorpions than turn on that game for more than 10 minutes.
It is just not my style.
Turns out, I am in the minority. Like way in the minority. In fact, a recent Zoosk.com survey reveals that 73 percent of single women would rather watch the Super Bowl than have sex. Come again?
I demand a recount! Those numbers seem off to me by about 70 percent. Either some people out there are having really bad sex or there are more people who like football than I think. I am going with the former.
Look, I hate football. I am open about this fact. I think it is a terrible, boring sport that turns American men into drooling rage-filled meat heads. But regardless of that, I really, really like sex.
OK, let's take this to my level. Say the survey asked this: Do you prefer shopping for two hours at Free People and Anthropologie or sex? Even then, I would say sex. Well, first I might ask: Are my kids on this shopping spree with me? If not, it would be a hard choice. But I am still going with sex.
There is almost nothing I would rather be doing than having sex. So who are these people who would rather watch a game on television than be intimate with someone they like, lust after or love?
Like I said, bad sex. It is the only answer. Because anyone who was having good sex would know that sex is better than just about anything else in the world. I mean, come on now. It is just ridiculous, really. Even the guys know better. Only 50 percent of them prefer football to sex!
Or, as my friend said, "How about both simultaneously? Throw in food as well, and I imagine you'll find some male takers."
Can't argue with that logic.
What would you prefer, Super Bowl or sex?
Image via RonAlmog/Flickr