Rape Victim Forced to Watch Video of Her Own Rape

Horrifying 67

mohammed azimI don't even understand why this was necessary. A man is on trial for a rape that was apparently caught by a security camera. So what does the judge do? He forces the rape victim to watch the video of her own attack so she can be cross-examined by the defense. Mohammed Azim was accused of smashing a bottle over a woman's head, dragging her by the hair into a factory, and raping her for 25 minutes. He was convicted. But did the victim really have to go through this in order for Azim to be found guilty?

I think Rape Crisis chief executive Yvonne Traynor speaks for most of us when she says, "I am appalled this woman had been through enough and then to be shown this in court to torture her again shows an appalling lack of consideration and common sense." Lack of consideration, ya think? Maybe I'd put it this way: Just plain cruel.

And lack of common sense -- can someone please explain why the victim needed to sit there in court and watch her own goddamn 25-minute-long rape? What questions did the defense need to ask about that? "Is that you in the video?" "Was this excruciatingly long attack done against your will?" "Are we a bunch of insensitive assholes?" Yes to all three. I would think the video is there as evidence more for the jury's consideration, and they could watch it with the victim out of the room.

And if, for whatever reason, the defense truly needed to question the victim on details in the video, couldn't the victim at least view the video in private, and not in court with everyone else?

Not to mention, how useful is the victim's testimony even going to be after she's gone through the emotional turmoil of watching her own rape? Wouldn't she be a more reliable witness if she were in a calmer, more emotionally neutral state? I think so.

Anyway, like I said, Azim was convicted, so I suppose this story could be worse. He faces 16 years in prison, which seems a little short to me. The judge said something about "you're lucky you didn't get mandatory life," and I'm kind of thinking, Yeah, why didn't he get life? What is with this judge?!?

Do you think a rape victim should ever have to watch a video of her own attack in court?


crime, in the news, sex crime


To add a comment, please log in with

Use Your CafeMom Profile

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Comment As a Guest

Guest comments are moderated and will not appear immediately.

Caera Caera

Without knowing ANYTHING about the case (much like the writer, obviously), I have no idea.

numba... numba_1_stunna

Well, it is already well known that MOST rape victims never come forward because they are scared they won't be believed, they don't want to relive it, they are ashamed, or they don't want to face their attacker in court. Thanks to this judge, I can just about gauantee those numbers will skyrocket now.

TheTr... TheTruthTeller

I'm scratching my head. I cannot think of a single reason the judge would agree to this. I can see a defense attorney trying to pull this to shame the victim into dropping it, but a judge is there to stop such tactics. This is ridiculous.

jalaz77 jalaz77

Um no...

jalaz77 jalaz77

Um no...

Maeclark Maeclark

What was the point they had him on tape there was no doubt she was telling the truth. The tape alone would have convicted him and she should have been allowed to leave the court room durring the showing. Shame on the judge for allowing that.

nonmember avatar Kristi

If it was going to help convict the rapist I could maybe (?) see the purpose?

EarlG... EarlGrayHot

No.  No reason at all to do that.

lizilli lizilli

This must the the "legitimate rape" school of thought, brought to us by Todd Akin, whom this judge must hold in high estieem.   Dispicable indeed.......

Dondi Braley

absolutely NOT...WTF? IS WRONG W/JUDGE?

1-10 of 67 comments 12345 Last