'Adventurous Woman' Sought to Birth First Neanderthal Baby in Thousands of Years

OMG 25

Neanderthal babyA Harvard professor** who once helped map the human genome is now gaining fame in a new way. He is seeking an "adventurous woman" to give birth to the first Neanderthal baby born in thousands of years. No, it's not Jurassic Park or science that is technically possible, if not totally impractical. This could really happen at some point. Maybe.

There is just one problem. Professor George Church needs a woman who would be willing to carry and birth the product of an experiment where artificial Neanderthal DNA from bone samples would be placed into stem cells, injected into an embryo, and then implanted. Wow. Sounds fun. Sign me up!

In an interview with Der Spiegel magazine, professor George Church says that it's technically possible and that, while his job isn't to say whether it's a good idea, it's an absolutely feasible one. Crazy, right? But is it?

According to Church, the ancient human ancestor known as the Neanderthal could actually be the key to increasing human longevity. He told the magazine that it wasn't just "curiosity" that is driving him.

... curiosity may be part of it, but it's not the most important driving force. The main goal is to increase diversity. The one thing that is bad for society is low diversity. This is true for culture or evolution, for species and also for whole societies. If you become a monoculture, you are at great risk of perishing. Therefore the recreation of Neanderthals would be mainly a question of societal risk avoidance.

What, at first blush, sounds totally insane is actually kind of making sense now, right? Damn science! In all seriousness, although I am not volunteering my uterus, I could see why a woman might be willing to do this. Why not be on the cutting edge of science?

Of course, there are all kinds of questions that I am sure Church could answer -- would the baby learn to talk? How would he/she be different from other babies? What would that mean for school? For his or her life? Would they hate being different?

Hmmm. The more questions I ask, the less I like the idea. As a mother myself, I know any woman who did this would be donating more than her womb. Few moms would be willing to walk away from their baby and leave him or her in the care of scientists. What kind of mom would that make them? So the ethical questions about the quality of life of the infant would give me great pause.

I guess I am not "adventurous" enough, after all. Dang. And it sounded like so much fun!

It feels like a dare issued to womankind: Who isn't going to be worried about the social ramifications and will be willing to put their child on the line for the sake of science? Who is willing to take the chance that the baby they grow in their belly for nine months is actually a dangerous experiment gone very wrong?

Not me. But it will be interesting to see if this ever really could happen.

Would you ever consider doing this?

 ***Editor's Note: This story has been revealed as a hoax by Professor Church.

Image via erix!/Flickr

in the news

25 Comments

To add a comment, please log in with

Use Your CafeMom Profile

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Comment As a Guest

Guest comments are moderated and will not appear immediately.

nonmember avatar blh

This is completely wrong. We have no right to play with human lives. Besides neanderthals went extinct or whatever for a reason, what good would they be to us? This man has no ethics.

Vegeta Vegeta

Saw this on geekologie, knew it would end up here. It probably won't work but hey its worth a try. I'm also on the moral level of 'prisoners should be killed and used for parts'. I'm aware of the implications that this monkey baby will have grey area rights and a crappy sick life. So kind of like a working class American just with more fur.

SOCO101 SOCO101

Wow. There are so many things wrong with this.  The baby will be raised as an experiment and more than likely be treated as a lab rat his/her whole life. And "low diversity" in our population is a load of bull! Most ppl born today are from mixed genes and cultures. Low diversity is not the problem here. It sounds like it's purely curiosity driven to me. 

Charli Rahe

Yikes. No way. Completely unethical, poor hypothetical Neanderthal baby.

nonmember avatar Christina

I'd do it, but the husband said "no."

ruby_... ruby_jewel_04

This is wrong on more levels than I think I can wrap my head around. Just because we HAVE the technology to play God, doens NOT mean we SHOULD. Neanderthals died out for a reason. We may not know what that reason is. but I bet it was a convincing one. Besides that, I dont care if its a test tube baby or not, that child would deserve rights of his/her own, and i think we all know that it would be kept in a lab and tested/poked/proded its entire misserasble life. 

Maevelyn Maevelyn

I don't think that reestablishing an extinct sentient species is a bad idea and they aren't human genetically, which means that you wouldn't be adding to the human culture anyway. he wants to do  it because he can. 


 

LeeshaE LeeshaE

Completely unethical this scientist lacks a moral compass. Somethings should be left to god.

tired... tiredmommy90

this is very wrong. that child wouldnt know love or comfort, and would be treated sub par at best. just...no

1-10 of 25 comments 123 Last