Adam Lanza Used a Bushmaster Rifle & Bushmaster Needs to Pull Its Ad Campaign, NOW

Rant 60

bushmaster adLet's put aside the issue of gun control for a moment and talk about something else: Truth in advertising. See, the gun Adam Lanza used to kill 20 children and 6 adults at Sandy Hook Elementary last Friday, was a semiautomatic Bushmaster .223 rifle. Bushmaster's ad campaign for the past 2 years, "Consider Your Man Card Reissued," essentially equates manliness with owning a military-style semiautomatic weapon. A military-style semiautomatic which can fire "dozens of high-velocity rounds" in mere seconds. Bushmaster implies that ownership of their product makes a man so manly his "man card" will be reisussed. I'm not arguing whether or not a man has the right to own this weapon. I'm just wondering how owning this weapon makes a man MORE of a man.

Is masculinity defined by the capacity to kill? What manly pursuit would require a "real man" (not including those in the military, of course) to own this weapon?

The Bushmaster .223 rifle isn't commonly used for hunting or target practice. However, Bushmaster's semiautomatic rifles have been used in "at least four mass shootings since 1999." Perhaps you recall the 2009 rampage in southern Alabama that killed 10 people? Or the 8 people who lost their lives in a 2010 Virginia shooting spree? Bushmaster semiautomatic rifles. Also the weapon of choice for the "Beltway snipers," John Allen Muhammed and Lee Boyd Malvo, who killed 15 people in 2001 and 2002. (Bushmaster settled a lawsuit by the snipers' victims' families in 2004 for $500,000.)

Where these horrific crimes "manly" acts?

Here's the thing: We have regulations when it comes to advertising cigarettes and alcohol. Right? Joe Camel has been replaced with grisly photos of ex-smokers with throat cancer. Shouldn't ad campaigns for firearms be subject to the same standards? (Hey, isn't there a federal organization called the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms?!)

Instead of "Consider Your Man Card Reissued," here are few catchphrases Bushmaster should consider for its next ad campaign:

This is a real gun and it killed real people
 
Real men don't use guns
 
No hunter ever used this gun
 
For losers only

Or better yet, don't advertise the damn thing at all.

Do you think firearms should be subject to regulations in advertising?

Image via Bushmaster

advertising, crime, guns, in the news

60 Comments

To add a comment, please log in with

Use Your CafeMom Profile

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Comment As a Guest

Guest comments are moderated and will not appear immediately.

atmar... atmartin06

Are you kidding me?  The gun killed people all on its own?  The crazy dude pulling the trigger had nothing to do with it, huh?  NEWSFLASH!  Guns don't kill people.  People kill people.  And yes, real men and women use guns.  Sane men and women use guns safely and don't harm other people with their guns.  eye rolling

Reepi... Reepicheep.CSL

He could have been wearing Levi's too. Should people stop selling and/or wearing them too. He was probably wearing some form of footwear too... better find out the brand or risk wearing the same kind.

Mimi Thy Lee Nguyen

How is someone going to sue the gun company because it was used in a shooting? Banning guns and not advertising them isn't going to stop criminals from doing what they do. What a bunch of a morons.

nonmember avatar nikki

Really?? What an article!

atmartin06 and reepicheep.CSL said it well.

I'm not surprised an article like this on thestir. Sometimes I wonder why log onto this site.

Why not have all those liquor companies pull their ads for those who drive drunk. I.get that this was a horrible senseless tragedy but the gun maker sure as hell didn't endorse the LUNATIC who committed the CRIME.

nonmember avatar Erik

Clearly Ms. Burt isn't a supporter of the First Amendment either.

nonmember avatar hello

For starters you don't pull the trigger on a 223 and bullets fly everywhere it is a semi-aut.You fire a single round after each trigger pull.Second,the overwhelming majority who own these guns
are responsible.BTW,the 2nd ammendy wasn 't about hunting in the 1st place it was for to allow all of us the insurance and protection against any future,tyranical gov't that would attempt to oppress the people.

ruby_... ruby_jewel_04

I agree with every single person who's posted above me. This is asinine. And I'll keep my guns, freedom, and rights thank you very much.

Misty... Misty.Dawn

im not even gonna say my thought bcus id pretty much be repeating every comment here. This article is ridiculous!

deLaLynn deLaLynn

I may be the only 1 but I do believe that this should be pulled. no 1 needs a gun like this. I don't understand why people get so up in arms like they're gonna take the pistols and hunting rifles. they want to take these away and they should. Jesus I see more people upset about them taking away guns than prayers for the victims of the shooting. it makes me sick I have no 1 else is disgusted by semi automatics and don't believe theyre a problem. mypin you might not be popular but it's what I believe.

deLaLynn deLaLynn

* opinion. and you can't compare Levis to a gun. these comparisons are crazy.

1-10 of 60 comments 12345 Last