Follow The Stir

Say What!?

Pro-Life License Plates Banned in the Name of Free Speech?!!

by Jenny Erikson on December 11, 2012 at 8:55 AM

Choose Life license plate North CarolinaA federal judge in North Carolina has banned pro-life license plates as unconstitutional unless the state also offers a pro-choice option. U.S. District Court Judge James Fox ruled on Friday that the “Choose Life” plates violate the First Amendment.

Yes, that is the one having to do with free speech. Oh the irony.

In news that will shock no one, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of North Carolina Legal Foundation filed the lawsuit on behalf of North Carolinians seeking a specialty license plate for the pro-choice crowd. Apparently, amendments were introduced to the legislature and rejected six times to authorize a new plate that would read “Trust Women. Respect Choice,” or “Respect Choice.”

When did “reproductive freedom” and “choice” and “abortion” all become synonymous? I’m all for a woman’s right to choose whether or not to reproduce. More power to her, whatever she decides. Six kids, no kids, kids conceived via fertility treatments as well as in the backseat of a ‘97 Honda, kids at 20, kids at 40, whatever. That’s the freedom. That’s the reproduction.

Abortion occurs after the reproductive freedom happens. Abortion ends another person’s life because his or her existence is “inconvenient.”

But enough from the pro-life soapbox -- let me step down and get on my pro-government one. This is a perfect example of why living in a republic is so awesome -- we get to elect our representatives. If North Carolinians are so intent upon a legislature that will approve pro-choice license plates, then they should vote for candidates that will do so. That’s what elections are for.

Plus we have that wonderful Tenth Amendment, which allows states to make their own laws based on the needs and wants of their residents. Residents of a state that won’t create a pro-choice license plate are welcome to move to a state like Virginia that does offer them.

Leave it to the ACLU to outlaw North Carolinians’ ability to practice free speech on their license plates in the name of free speech.

What do you think of Judge Fox’s ruling?


Filed Under: abortion, censorship, discrimination, feminism, in the news, law, women's issues

Comments

60
  • jagam...
    --

    jagamama0710

    December 11, 2012 at 9:07 AM

    Switch the pro life and pro choice roles in this story and you'd be singing such a different song and you know it. 


  • Laurlev
    --

    Laurlev

    December 11, 2012 at 9:11 AM
    I think it's dumb. There are far more important issues than a liscense plate.
  • Rache...
    -- Facebook comment from

    Rachel Johnson

    December 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM
    Telling people to move to another state so they can have pro-choice license plates is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. While I think banning them is a little extreme, I think the minority opinion should be represented as well.
  • Jlm
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Jlm

    December 11, 2012 at 9:17 AM
    Occasionally this website makes me want to punch myself in the face, this is one of those times. This is a really obnoxious and ignorant sounding post.
  • blh
    -- Nonmember comment from

    blh

    December 11, 2012 at 9:22 AM
    I'm pro-choice, and I think this is idiotic.
  • shesl...
    --

    shesliketx

    December 11, 2012 at 9:26 AM
    Why is it that the author is in huge favor of limited government except when the issue arises about telling someone what they can and can't do based on morals? I disagree with the ban on pro life plates (and I'm extremely pro choice), but it is ridiculous that there isn't one representing the other side of the issue.
  • Estel...
    --

    EstellaHavisham

    December 11, 2012 at 9:39 AM

    I think we're all avoiding the real issue here: why anyone would want a pro-choice/pro-life license plate to begin with. 


  • Flowe...
    --

    FlowerMama100

    December 11, 2012 at 9:43 AM

    Seems fair.  If you have one, you should probably offer the other.  Is that the problem?  That it's fair? 

     

    Also, I think Estella hit the nail on the head here.


  • Joshua
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Joshua

    December 11, 2012 at 9:47 AM
    jagamama hit the nail on the head here. If this was Massachusetts or California whose voting population wanted a pro-choice and not a pro-life option, Jenny would have heads rolling because of (yet again) free speech. Our laws are in place to protect the minority, regardless of the opinions of the voting majority.
  • Histo...
    --

    HistoryMamaX3

    December 11, 2012 at 9:48 AM

    Virginia has a license plate for everything. lol


1-10 of 60 comments

To leave a comment, log in as a CafeMom member:

Log In

OR, use our non-member comment form: