Paul Ryan Needs to Stop Lying if He Wants to Be Vice President

Political Wrangling 43

Paul RyanVoter, there's some important news from the campaign trail you need to hear. Now. Mitt Romney's running mate Paul Ryan may not be the man you think he is. In fact, it's looking increasingly likely that the man running for vice president is a small wooden boy whose father's name is Geppetto (no word yet on whether his conscience goes by the name Jiminy).

I know, it sounds so unlikely! But then, so do the host of lies the Wisconsin Congressman has been caught in lately. You've probably heard how he faked his marathon time? Now there's another whopper that's been uncovered.

The folks at Slate pored over the fitness-crazed Congressman's claims that working out with the P90X and (prepare as I'm about to blaspheme) skipping cake on his birthday has helped him trim down to just 6 to 8 percent body fat. But according to the experts they contacted, that kind of skinny only exists in elite runners. And as we've already determined by his not as awesome as he'd like us to think marathon time, Ryan is NOT an elite runner. He's not even a top college swimmer, who are fatties by comparison to the runners with a typical 9.8 percent body fat ratio.

So what does all this mean? Is Ryan a bad candidate because he doesn't have the same body as Usain Bolt? Of course not. Voters shouldn't be that shallow. But then ... neither should Paul Ryan.

Paul Ryan is a bad candidate because he subscribes to the Pinocchio school of telling the truth. He's been caught lying about the most banal things, at times when he wasn't even on a hot seat. We'd be foolish as voters if we didn't wonder what else he's lied about and where he might be casual with the truth in the future. Once a liar, always a liar.

This is a man who wants to assume the second-highest office in the country, to be a heartbeat away from the presidency as they say. I don't think it's too much to want to be able to trust the man who's in that seat.

Do you trust Paul Ryan? Will you vote for him?


Image via monkeyz_uncle/Flickr

2012 election, election, mitt romney


To add a comment, please log in with

Use Your CafeMom Profile

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Comment As a Guest

Guest comments are moderated and will not appear immediately.

bills... billsfan1104

Tiny, you guys voted for Obama and Clinton.

BubbsJNL BubbsJNL

Tinypossum - we already DID elect an elitist snob and compulsive liar.  And I mean "we", because I did too.

I believe that people INTENTIONALLY misunderstand things in order to prove their own point.  Romney is not "writing off" "deadbeat moochers".  What he said was that there was no way that they are going to vote for him, in any case, as they are too well taken care of under the Obama administration, so he has to concentrate on the 10-15% that fall between his conservative base and the unattainable "deadbeat moochers" - and that's YOUR phrase, NOT HIS.  Since the release of the tapes and all of the detailed research into that 47% number, it turns out that some of them actually may be reachable as they are elderly people who have paid into the SS system their whole lives and don't have to pay taxes on their Social Security receipts and veterans who receive VA benefits.

The folks who are playing the system, the folks who are very happy receiving government assistance without working for it - those are the folks that Romney will never get.  What he said wasn't wrong in the context in which he said it.

nonmember avatar Guest

@tinypossum, well, clearly you are not part of the portion of the population that Romney described as thoughtful, who might be reached with reason...

41-43 of 43 comments First 12345