
Poor Prince Harry. He's had a lot of humiliation lately what with that nude scandal. And now his grandmother, who happens to be, you know, the Queen of England, is piling it on! C'mon, Liz. The boy is off to war, dontcha know! Give him a break, will ya?! But rumor has it that ol' Elizabeth is furious that an au naturel Harry partied it up in Vegas. And the Queen can't exactly tell Harry to go to his room (or castle), so she's supposedly demanding he take a DNA test to prove he's a blood monarch. Rumors have persisted for years that Harry wasn't conceived with Charles' royal sperm but with the baby maker of a commoner! Well, maybe it's true. What of it?
According to The National Enquirer (yeah, I know, but they got that whole John Edwards' love child thing right!), the Queen is livid with Harry's wild ways and she's insisting on a DNA test. For years there have been whispers (well, not whispers really, more like bellowing) that Harry isn't the offspring of Charles, but rather the result of an affair between Princess Diana and cavalry officer James Hewitt.
These rumors won't go away despite James saying he met Diana only after Harry's birth, mostly because Harry and James are both ginger. And they look a bit alike. In some photos. Sometimes.
But here's the real question, folks. Does anyone really give a pint of ale if Harry is Charles' kid or not? No one likes Charles. Not even the Queen. Notice how she still won't step down to let her son rule? Everyone knows she'd prefer the crown go straight to William.
Neither DNA nor Naked Vegas Partayyy will stop Harry from being Diana's son ... and just as Diana was the People's Princess, so Harry is the People's Prince. Just look at all those subjects and non-subjects willing to get naked in solidarity with him. Think they'd do that for Charles? Pishaw!
Our hearts (and some other parts) are with Harry as he heads to Afghanistan. Come back safely so you can party some more, my ginger prince.
Should it matter if Harry is Charles' kid?
Image via Getty


Tie-Dye for the Fourth of July!
Mom Survives Horrific Domestic Abuse
Kim and Kanye's Baby Name Predictions!
Moms Love Birthday Parties, Too!


















Comments 12
I agree that even if he ends up not being Charles' son, Harry will still reign in the hearts of people all over the world because he's Diana's son. I might even go so far as to say that some would like him better. The only difference it may make for him is that he'd no longer be in line to inheirit the crown and I can't see him wanting to play king anyway. Stay safe Harry - we all love you.
Since when does a Queen "step down" to let her son rule? A ruling Queen (or King) does not step down, they are there for life.
Just saying...
Look at the humiliation and pain Diana's screwing around has caused this kid?
CM bloggers and the Liberal media will preach to us to " live how you want, screw the world...........".
Innocents pay the price, always.
uuuuh, Queen Elizabeth II's uncle "stepped down" or abdicated the throne being the appropriate term to marry an American in 1936. Elizabeth's father George became King and she Queen upon his death in 1952. If not for he uncle abdicating she may have never been Queen. Just sayin'....it's not "for life"
for her* uncle
Screwy love lives of the royals are nothing new. In my opinion, this would be the time for Prince Charles to man up and claim his sons royal birthright, even without DNA testing. Even Queen Elizabeth I had questionable parentage, and was considered by many to be a bastard, therefore not a true heir to the throne. Yet, she became one of the most loved and prosperous rulers in her nations history-
Maybe the Queen should look to her namesake and take that into consideration-
Really? Because I always thought Harry looked just like Prince Charles... O.o