During a speech on Tuesday at a campaign stop in Danville, Virginia, Joe Biden warned his crowd of attentive listeners about Mitt Romney’s intentions to undo Wall Street reforms. He spoke boldly, confidently, and authoritatively, then capped the accusation off with, “They’re gonna put y’all back in chains.”
Now there are only a handful of people who might be angered by that comment: recovering masochists, inmates, POWs ... and African-Americans. Forty-eight percent of Danville’s population is black, and the audience that day reflected that demographic. You know darn good and well you can’t reference chains in a room full of black folks. Come on now, Joe. Talk about open mouth, insert foot. (And incidentally, they’re called “coffles.”)
A little research beforehand would've told him that the city of Danville was a high stakes player in the slavery melodrama, just like almost every other Southern city, town, and village. There was even a race riot in 1883. But it doesn't take a stab at being a historian to tip off a person in a position of power that it’s probably not wise to even hint at the enslavement period unless you’re prepared to say something constructive. And that, my friends, wasn’t it.
I like Joe Biden. I do. But I’m just not quite sure how to make this train wreck of a metaphor be OK. Honestly, if I was there, I would've been offended. I’m the person in the room who catches stuff like that and balls my face up in very obvious disgust. (Though, I must admit, I would've been more taken aback by how much that man has aged since the last time I saw him. I’m not a J.B. groupie so I don’t keep track of his media stops and campaign events, but I was like good Lord! Prez and his VP can keep that White House gig. It apparently zaps everyone who takes it of any drop of youthfulness. Yikes. But I digress.)
The Romney campaign hopped on this chains-in-Danville faux pas like a pimple on a prom queen and has wrangled it into representing Biden’s plot for racial divisiveness. Deep sigh and eye roll. I don’t think it boils down to all of that. I think it’s just one of those insensitive remarks someone who is part of the majority makes because they don’t have any cultural wounds to watch out for themselves. Hear tell some folks, we should be “over it” anyway, so any residuals of slavery should be fair game to be joked about, openly referenced, and used in illustrative quips during campaign speeches.
It’s not enough to make me dislike Joe, though. I mean, honestly, if that was the case, I’d be scratching folks off my list one by one, and not all of them white, either, including an old boss who told me I was surprisingly articulate for someone who graduated from Lincoln (which is a black college in Pennsylvania), for example, or the man from Capitol Hill who referred to my neighborhood as “the jungle” when I told him what part of D.C. I live in.
Being black is certainly not tragic but you do have to learn when to pick your battles and be selective about when to be offended. Otherwise, you’ll burn yourself out or bleach your skin and try to create a whole other race or assimilate as inconspicuously as you can into another one.
Yes, Biden's comment was insulting and in poor taste, and I hope my president digs into his VP’s backside for saying such a thing. But compared to the policies that have been historically levied by presidents past to decimate our community in everything from the three strikes rule to pro-gentrification rezoning, it’s just a tiny boo boo on a body full of gashes and cuts. So I’m not allowing this to be a distraction. Puh-lease. Someone is about due to say or do something foolish again in about 24 hours, anyway, and this too shall pass.
Do you think his comments were offensive?
Image via DonkeyHotey/Flickr


Ashley Is a Widow Who Stays Strong...
This Hot Dad Wants to Vacuum Your Rug
This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
















Comments 61
I'm questioning you because you don't provide links. I did. It is possible, just give it a try. Again, as was stated by another poster, the economy is not improving. Wall Street could be raking in trillions and it isn't impacting what democrats love to refer to as "main street". Groceries are more expensive and prices are expected to continue to rise, gas is more expensive, house values have plummeted (meaning people lost tons of equity), unemployment is still at record highs, companies are leery of regulatory practices by the Obama administration causing them to behave far more conservatively thereby taking fewer risks and hiring fewer people, household wealth is declining, supply of goods is shrinking, and on and on.
Jessica Allen, you are absolutely delusional. Not only did I not concede anything I blatantly disproved your idiotic claims. Thanks for agreeing that the economy is not better. According to this BLS chart unemployment climbed from April 2008 through January 2009, meaning January had the highest unemployment rate of that time period. However, the chart I've linked to from the BLS gives the unemployment rates as 7.6 not 8.3, a significant difference. You'll also notice that my statement was that unemployment is at record highs, not that we didn't have an employment problem under Bush. Currently, the BLS lists the seasonally adjusted (meaning skewed downward to make the problem appear less severe) and not the total of unemployed for 15 wks or longer, under-employed (working part time because they can't find full time work), and those who have lost hope of finding jobs (which total is actually 16.3) at 8.6 (not a.3 as you claim). So not only are both numbers (2009 and 2012) astronomically high, the 2012 number is a full point higher than the Jan 09 number. Major statistical difference in unemployment. The economy is still bad. Repeat after me, the economy is still bad. Since you refuse to "bother with the rest" then you are clearly conceding.
-Continued-
Honestly, more important than proving you wrong is getting you to see that there is still a major problem in this nation that needs to be addressed. People are hurting because of a terrible economy. There is a clear choice on how to attack the problem. I pick the man who can fix it. You pick the guy who exacerbated and prolonged it.
"Delusional"- again, pot meet kettle. The gist of the article (remember that?), and many comments here, were that politicians of both parties have made numerous offensive gaffes. I further added supporting proof that Romney has made many disrespectful, insulting, and dishonest remarks, which Republican-dominated news organizations have confirmed.
Try comprehending when you read. The statements above ("Home Values Rise," "economists expect the U.S. to avoid falling into a recession," "(stock) market ... making new yearly highs") were reported by Fox News (Republican,) Wall Street Journal (Republican,) and CNN (independent,) and since it is necessary to repeat things for you, these news organizations have contended the economy is recovering, and so your arguments are with them.