At first glance, Paul Ryan seems like a promising candidate. He claims he has an effective plan in place to balance the budget, improve the economy, and get Americans back to work. The interesting part about his plan is that during his first one-on-one interview with Brit Hume on Tuesday, Ryan admitted, after waffling around the question, that under the Romney/Ryan plan, it would take at least 10 years to balance the budget. He couldn’t provide a clear answer as to what exactly the plan entailed; instead, he chose to attack Obama rather than provide answers.
And there’s more bad news.
Ryan’s track record promises to take a step backward for women’s reproductive rights -- a right that Obama, Biden, and previous administrations have fought hard to take a stand for. Ryan co-sponsored a bill that could ban in-vitro fertilization for couples trying to conceive. He supports banning many common forms of birth control for women, including the pill. And if that’s not enough, Ryan voted against the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which helps women fight for equal pay for equal work. Although the economy is certainly an important issue, protecting the fundamental equal rights of women is paramount. I prefer not to have a man, or the government, decide what my reproductive rights and options are.
Ryan also supports Romney’s plan to provide tax incentives for the wealthy at the expense of the middle class. Ryan supports a tax plan that would give our wealthiest Americans an after tax income increase by at least 8.7 percent. Under Ryan’s plan, people earning over $1 million per year would receive tax cuts of over $260,000 each year. We can also say good-bye to Medicare with Ryan in office and hello to a voucher system for our seniors.
Is Ryan a good choice for Romney? Only if you support a track record on radical conservative views on women’s health. Ryan likely helped Romney reconnect with our most conservative voters, but for your average American, Ryan promises to move our country backward not forward.
This post is part of a weekly conversation with our Moms Matter 2012 political bloggers. To see the original question and what the other writers have to say, see "Romney Picks Paul Ryan as VP."
Image via Gage Skidmore/Flickr



Ashley Is a Widow Who Stays Strong...
This Hot Dad Wants to Vacuum Your Rug
This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
















Comments 63
I wish we had a vote of "no cofidence" in america. I'm really not happy with anyone running this year.
Are we better off now than we were 4 years ago?
NO!
Go MUTTS!!!!!!!! I agree AGAIN :)
Luckilly, my SO is an electrician with experience in residential, commercial, and oilfields so there is always a demand for people of his skill level. But with layoffs due to new government policies under Obama, it took a long time for him to find a company that wasn't effected as much, and could pay him prevailing wage.
Cont:
But not all Americans have been so lucky. I see just in our own neighborhood the number of houses being foreclosed on has trippled, job loss was the rule instead of the exception..
I could go on for days.
All I can say, and keep it short, is that I certainly hope America opens its eyes, and makes sure Obama is a one term president
You know what else? You know all those cute little "lolz" kitten pictures you get in your e-mail? Well, right after they take the picture, Ryan hunts down the cute little kitten, molests it, skins it and eats it ALIVE!!!
Baaaah! Baaaaah!
Under the Ryan energy plan, he wants to use barefoot and naked women as slave labor in coal mines!!!
Baaaah! Baaaaah!
Ryan want to do lots of other mean and nasty things too, I just have to go back over to shriekingliberalfreak.org to get programmed with more really true facts!
Baaaah! Baaaaah!
-Liberal Sheep
A few years ago, a plan for a long term gradual transition to a balanced budget would maybe, barely, have even earned you the title "conservative". Only on some sort of "bizarro planet" (or since the democrats took over congress) where $1,300,000,000,000!!!,!!!,!!!,!!! per year deficits are considered somehow "normal" would such a plan be able to be called "radical" by contrast.
BTW, I don't suppose it ever occured to you that "www barackobama com" might not be an entirely, 100% objective source?
During an appearance Tuesday on MSNBC, former Democratic congressman Patrick Murphy of Pennsylvania said that "Paul Ryan also believes we should ban all birth control as well. He voted for that."
Murphy's claim is false and bizarre: Ryan does not favor banning contraception, nor has he ever voted to ban contraception. In the modern era, there hasn't been any legislation offered by anyone in Congress to ban birth control.
In fact, Ryan, like other conservative Republicans in the House, has voted for hundreds of millions of dollars in contraceptive funding for low-income women through the program Title X. Ryan has voted for the Pence amendment to keep Title X funds from going to the largest abortion provider in America, but the Pence amendment did not decrease Title X funding by one dime. Indeed, Congressman Mike Pence (R, Ind.), praised the Title X program on the House floor when he offered his amendment in 2009: