Four pregnant women sit next to each other at a busy airport. Cara, is from Canada, Mary is from Mexico, Anne is from the U.S., and Irene is from Italy. Like most women that have just met, they are able to form an instant bond about their pregnancies. They shared how much weight they have gained, stories about morning sickness, and more. For the most part, their stories are typical. It’s not until the conversation turns to the topic of maternity leave do their stories start to differ.
Cara shares that she will be at home on a paid leave for almost an entire year after her baby’s birth. She will return to work two weeks before her baby turns one. Mary, who will get 12 weeks of paid leave, looks at Cara with envy. She is worried that 12 weeks of paid leave is not enough time to before she returns to work. Irene is not as worried because she knows that five and half months of paid time off will give her enough time to get the baby on a decent schedule before she returns to work.
But when Anne shares her story, the other ladies realize they don't have it as bad. Anne will stay home with her baby, not because she can afford to, but because she can’t afford childcare. Although Anne has been working as a paralegal for a small law firm for the last four years, she is not eligible for any paid time off when the baby is born. Like many American women, she used all her vacation and personal days to attend her routine pregnancy exams. By the time the baby arrives, she will not have any more paid time off. Anne will work until the baby is born and she will not return to work. She will quit. It doesn't matter than Anne works for a thriving law practice. She is the only paralegal on staff and her firm will not be able to sustain the practice without her. A replacement, a male, has already been hired.
Anne was faced with a problem that many American women are faced with she decides to have a child. What to do when the child is born. Anne does not make enough money to afford child care. So she has been left with the only choice available, to quit.
How is it possible that the leader of the free world, fails when it comes to protecting new moms? There is no reason why the United States is one of only three nations in the world that does not require employers to offer paid leave to new moms.
At the federal level, there is some limited protection for pregnant women through the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, The Family and Medical Leave Act, or Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. But not all women are covered under those laws. Those laws apply only if you work for what is called a “covered employer,” or an employer that has either 20, 50, or 15 employees, respectively. Women are left to try and find protection through any available state statutes that may or may not offer protection to more women.
Some may argue that the U.S. doesn't value family, motherhood, or breastfeeding as do other countries. Who knows. But it’s time for us to get it together. If 178 other nations can figure it out, so can we. Let’s stand up for new moms in this country and require that employers offer paid time off to all new moms.
Image Credit via Ficus/Flickr


Moms Love Birthday Parties, Too!
Father Knows Best - Happy Father's Day!
Are Cheaters Entitled to Privacy? - A...
Road Trips Make Mommies Wild!

















Comments 56
There will be some that say they shouldn't have to pay for a woman's time when she willingly got pregnant. As a woman with 3 kids (planned), I have worked for 18 years and have paid into the government. I have paid for insurance for those who couldn't afford it or didn't opt to get any. I have also paid for those on welfare who may really need it and for those who were to lazy to get a job.
I would prefer to pay into a maternity fund rather than pay for a deadbeat to sit on their ass while I have to leave my children to be raised by a sitter. Why shouldn't the US have paid maternity leave made standard? They pay salaries for those who hold office for much longer than they are in office.
This story seems really fake. If she knew she couldn't afford child care with her salary, why wasn't she saving up before her pregnancy and while she was working? I am also confused as to how she can't afford child care for her baby but can afford to stay at home? I think that it is selfish for mothers to expect their employees to pay for them to stay home and take care of a baby. I knew that with my job I wouldn't get paid maternity leave so I asked my manager for two weeks off from work after my due date. I was just fine for those two weeks and after because I had saved up the money before hand. I think that passing a law that requires paid maternity leave will just result in less women working in high paying jobs. We already wonder why men are paid more than we are..
Tigger,
Daycare for my two sons eat up my entire salary. If my health insurance had not been so good, I would have had to stay home because including the tax impact and extra costs, I probably lost money to work.
How you managed to physically go back to work after two weeks I will never know? My c-section scar didn't close until 11 weeks after birth.
Why can't SS pay for this?
Our employers are not required to hold our position until we return, they are simply required to offer a similar position at the end of our leave.
Not every woman "plans" her pregnancy. Both of my pregnancies were unplanned. Turns out, birth control is not 100% effective.
With two kids, it makes more financial sense for me to stay home, as I would need 2 full time jobs just to cover daycare. I wouldn't be bringing home any further disposable income, so we've cut our expenses instead.
Not everything is black and white. There are shades of grey, so please don't be so quick to judge.
Ok...I wantAAALLL of yall who this to be such a FATASTICAL idea to re read exactly what nanabird just wrote. They GET the benefit because they PAY for it. They PAY a pretty huge portion of their checks to the government. So long as all of you who are for this realize that it wont come AND include your current rate of take home pay.....fine. AND you realize that you will continue to pay whether you have children or not and when you no longer can have them. I havent done the math but I have a feeling it's paid for and THEN some. The article seems to fail to mention this....
LittleFrogs, I didn't have a c-section and I have a sit down job which allowed me to return to work early. I do wish that I could have stayed home longer or even quit my job all together but that wasn't an option. There would've been a big loss of income for my family if I had chosen not to return to work. I already knew what child care was going to cost me and that I wasn't going to get paid leave so that's why we saved money for the payments and that's why I keep working just to stay ahead.