Follow The Stir

Say What!?

Confession in Etan Patz' Murder Was Hidden by Church Group for Decades

by Jeanne Sager on May 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM

Etan Patz missing posterThere's an old saying in law enforcement. "If you see something, say something." So what happens when you hear something? A confession, perhaps, from Pedro Hernandez, a man who says he kidnapped and killed a little boy named Etan Patz, the 6-year-old whose name is famous as the first "boy on the milk carton"? What do you do?

Well, if you were a member of a prayer group at St. Anthony of Padua Roman Catholic Church in Camden, NJ in the early 1980s, apparently you did nothing. No. Really! Members of the group told The New York Times this weekend that they didn't feel it was "their place" to pass on a confession they allegedly heard from Hernandez during a group meeting decades ago.

Ahem. I wanted to put this nicely ... and then I realized that these people didn't care about nice when they let a man they thought might be a deranged killer walk right out of their church. So instead I'll be frank.

Every single prayer group member who listened to Pedro Hernandez' confession should be ashamed of themselves. And then some. Because not saying something wasn't just selfish, it was dangerous.

Just think: if the folks from St. Anthony's had spoken up, and Hernandez really was the guy (remember, he's confessed but has not yet been convicted), they would have gotten a murderer off the streets, thereby protecting all innocent kids he could ever encounter in his day to day ... kids like their nephews, their nieces, their grandkids. And they would have given Etan Patz' parents some kind of answer, instead of leaving them to wonder for decades what had happened to their child.

When Hernandez spoke to them, he could have been lying. It's true.

If they'd turned him in, what is the worst that could happen? A man who confessed to abducting and strangling a well-known missing child in the stockroom of a lower Manhattan bodega would be forced to talk to police about it? If he didn't do it, he could have cleared that up. But if he did ... let's just say that's not a risk I would have taken just because I wanted to stay in "my place."

What would you have done in the shoes of those prayer group members?


Filed Under: crime, missing person

Comments

18
  • kaerae
    -- Nonmember comment from

    kaerae

    May 29, 2012 at 12:39 PM
    This is absolutely sickening. Was it "their place" to let these parents wonder every day for 30 years if their boy was still alive, being raped or tortured someplace? It is amazing how people can check their conscience and their brain at the chruch door. I only wish they could be charged as accessories after the fact.
  • Flori...
    --

    Floridamom96

    May 29, 2012 at 12:42 PM

    Couldn't agree with you more. They should absolutely be ashamed and then some. Disgusting!


  • Shelly
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Shelly

    May 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM
    Does this rally surprise anyone, coming from the Catholic church? How many predators have the protected for decades? Why would this one surprise? They protect and serve criminals, more then innocent children.
  • KenneMaw
    --

    KenneMaw

    May 29, 2012 at 12:51 PM

    I would have gone to the police immediately.   A priest isn't allowed to say anything heard in a confessional, but as I understand your post, this confession was in a prayer group. 


  • jojoma
    -- Nonmember comment from

    jojoma

    May 29, 2012 at 1:00 PM
    more ass-backwards logic from the minds of the catholic church...
  • dani0622
    --

    dani0622

    May 29, 2012 at 1:12 PM

    First of all, no need to bash the Catholics. It doesn't matter what religion these people are, this is just plain WRONG. I am a praticing Catholic and believe these people should be held responsible for at some level for allowing this. I would have called the cops immediately during that meeting and not left that murderer leave.


  • kaerae
    -- Nonmember comment from

    kaerae

    May 29, 2012 at 1:21 PM
    @dani - While I'm sure there are MANY ethical catholics out there, the institution of the RC Church, at its highest levels, has engaged in systematic protection of its own clergy at the expense of children's safety for decades. I think they have a little bashing coming their way.
  • Brenda
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Brenda

    May 29, 2012 at 1:24 PM
    These people should be charged with covering up a Murder. they knew about it and chose not to reveal that a child had been murdered. To me that makes them as guilty as the man that Killed this child. It wasnt their place to decide if it was a lie or the truth. That is the job of the police. I wonder how many of them would have kept the truth hidden if it had been their child.
  • lalab...
    --

    lalaboosh

    May 29, 2012 at 1:59 PM
    Aiding and abetting? Isn't that what this is called? Isn't that a crime?!
  • Maevelyn
    --

    Maevelyn

    May 29, 2012 at 1:59 PM

    at first I thought from the title he had confessed to a priest (who's testamony could actually damage a case bc it's inadmissable as far as I know, plus they are forbidden to speak anything they hear in confession. Even a preist will and is ethically bound to report a crime he whitnesses or hears about in a non-confession enviroment. I'm pretty sure that they can be charged. 


1-10 of 18 comments

To leave a comment, log in as a CafeMom member:

Log In

OR, use our non-member comment form: