Wednesday concluded Day 3 of oral arguments in the Supreme Court over the constitutional validity of the individual mandate portion of Obamacare. At issue: Is Congress authorized under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution to demand that all Americans purchase a product or service, regardless of whether or not the want it or even use it?
In comes the slippery slope argument. After all, if the government can force you to purchase health insurance, what else can they force you to do? Buy a Chevy Volt tin can on wheels that sometimes sets itself on fire? How about terrorism insurance?
It’s been entertaining to read the transcripts from the Supreme Court, because the justices not in favor of the individual mandate have been asking the same questions I’ve been asking since Obama first mentioned health care reform. What can the government force you to buy?
Justice Alito asked Solicitor General Verrilli (basically, he’s the lawyer defending Obamacare) if the government could force someone to buy burial plots:
“Suppose that you and I walked around downtown Washington at lunch hour and we found a couple of healthy young people and we stopped them and we said: You know what you're doing? You are financing your burial services right now because eventually you're going to die, and somebody is going to have to pay for it, and if you don't have burial insurance and you haven't saved money for it, you're going to shift the cost to somebody else.”
Chief Justice Roberts asked if the government could make you buy cell phones:
Well, the same, it seems to me, would be true say for the market in emergency services: police, fire, ambulance, roadside assistance, whatever. You don't know when you're going to need it; you're not sure that you will. But the same is true for health care. You don't know if you're going to need a heart transplant or if you ever will. So there is a market there. To -- in some extent, we all participate in it. So can the government require you to buy a cell phone because that would facilitate responding when you need emergency services? You can just dial 911 no matter where you are?
Justice Scalia (my personal favorite!) wanted to know if exercise club memberships should be mandated, since, you know, exercising is good for your overall health:
"The something else is everybody has to exercise, because there's no doubt that lack of exercise cause -- causes illness, and that causes health care costs to go up. So the federal government says everybody has to -- to join a -- an exercise club. That's -- that's the something else."
The right-leaning justices say they are prepared to strike down the entire boondoggle of a law. Sure, we have a health insurance problem in our country. The way to fix it is not to mandate health insurance – that will only make it worse. Heck, even professional Democrat James Carville thinks striking down the law is a good idea:
"I think that [an overturn] will be the best thing that ever happened to the Democratic party because health care costs are gonna escalate unbelievably," Carville told CNN's Wolf Blitzer in his characteristic southern drawl, adding "I really believe that, this is not spin."
Maybe once Obamacare is officially out the door, we can start the real work of reforming health care: Untangling the government from what should be private purchases of professional services by free citizens.
Image via Phil Roeder/Flickr


This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
This Hot Dad Cooks AND Does the Dishes
Kanye West is Gay?!
















Comments 25
SURE! then we can all cancel our auto insurance too...and SCREW the public school system, they can't FORCE me to vaccinate my kids before they attend school there...and hey, the cops work for the government too right?Well the next time a cop pulls me over and tries to tell me I need to not speed or drink and drive, I can tell him to stick it!WOOHOO! we can do whatever we want! Pfft, screw all those sick and dying icky lazy poor people who can't afford their medical bills because they don't have insurance and have been denied due to a pre exisiting conditions.All I care is about is MEMEME and NOBODY can tell ME what to do!
I'm going to ask this again here, because nobody bothered to answer on the other thread:
So, do any of the naysayers have a solution for dreabug (dreabug said her husband would die without Obamacare) or the parents of the little girl in the video (video of a little girl with a disease that used up her lifetime of insurance by the time she was 6mos. old)? Or the woman I know who had a premature baby, so both she and her child now can't get insurance because of a pre-existing condition? What is your HONEST answer for these people?
1) Do you just want the clause stricken that says everyone must buy health insurance?
2) If the Affordable Care Act is defeated completely, what are the Republican Candidates solutions? Do they have any ideas? Do you?
Please. How hard is this to answer? Jenny obviously doesn't have any ideas. Do you?
I also believe that there should be tort reform.
And another thing, i dont think the insurance co should be able to cancel you because of a serious illness.
So thats why i think so of the bill is good, but most of it is not. They need to repeal it and start over.
The reason that health care costs are so high is because those who can pay are subsidizing those who cannot. You can walk into an emergency room in any hospital and they HAVE to treat you, regardless of if you can pay. Are costs high? Absolutely. I was charged $175 for a nurse to give my daughter a shot. One shot. It took TWO minutes. My fiance had to pay $1700 for twenty minutes and three stitches. But if I hadn't had the money, I still would have gotten the care. There is Medicaid, which would be greatly expanded if only the individual mandate is struck down, and there is HCAP. There are options for people without money in hand, procrastamom. And besides. If they don't have the money for insurance and don't qualify for Medicaid there's a big fine to pay. And that's doing no one any good either. This just simply isn't the answer.
@SwePea - you won't be popular for saying that, but I think you're spot on. Almost every other first world country has some form of UHC and their people are better off for it.
@SwePea - you won't be popular for saying that, but I think you're spot on. Almost every other first world country has some form of UHC and their people are better off for it.