Rush Limbaugh's vitirol directed at Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown law student who testified about federal coverage of birth control, just won't quit. Even as advertisers have faced protests from both sides of the aisle and pulled out from sponsoring his show, the radio host has continued to perpetuate the asinine assertion that Fluke's testimony revolved around her having "so much sex" that she needs the government to pay for her contraceptives.
Seems pretty safe to assume from his nonstop drivel that the man a.) doesn't understand how birth control pills work (hey, Rush, you don't just take one pill per sexual episode, like you one might erectile dysfunction drugs!) and b.) doesn't understand that Fluke's focus in her testimony was on painful or even reproductive health-threatening conditions that can be helped with oral contraceptives.
The good news: It's looking more and more like he's going to have to pay for his incredible ignorance and vile words.
By continuing to verbally attack Fluke, Rush appears to be digging his grave deeper and deeper. Even though the cowardly Republican candidates have refused to come out swinging against Rush's attacks, their campaign strategists could implore them to distance themselves from him, or else lose a significant amount of independent and female votes. And if the candidates keep Rush at an arm's length, his ratings could take a hit. What's even more, he's setting himself up for what could become a major legal mess.
Yesterday, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) mentioned a lawsuit against Limbaugh. She said, "We will be filing a slander suit against Rush Limbaugh. What he's really trying to do is silence a young woman. It's unfair, it's un-American." Fluke herself seems on the fence about taking legal action. She told The Daily Beast:
I've certainly been told I might have a case, but it’s not something I’ve made any decisions about at this point.
If she does decide to file, Fluke's status as a private citizen makes her entitled to stronger protection against slander than someone who lives their life very much in the public eye. So, there's a strong chance she could beat him big time.
It would be fitting and fantastic to see Fluke and/or Maloney take the next step and file the lawsuit against Rush. The top Republicans may not be willing to stand up to him, but it's clear someone has to. What better way to do that then taking him down in court? Rush has always flirted with the line, but this time he's more than crossed it. It's time for him to pay.
Do you think Sandra Fluke should sue Rush Limbaugh for slander? At the very least, doesn't he owe Fluke and all women an apology?
Image via Ethan Miller/Getty Images


Kim and Kanye's Baby Name Predictions!
Moms Love Birthday Parties, Too!
Father Knows Best - Happy Father's Day!
Are Cheaters Entitled to Privacy? - A...

















Comments 93
I think that Sandra Fluke should sue for defamation of character. He called her a prostitute and said she sold sex for money and called her a slut. She was testifying about a friend who had to take birth control drugs for a problem with an ovaryr cysts that were eiher pre-cancerous or cancerous and the birth control pills were prescribed for the condition and it was expensive to pay for and was excluded from prescription drugs. Even if she chose to use birth control herself it would not make hera prostitute or that getting free medications would mean she took money for sex. Limbaugh said he;d like to watch. So who is he deviant? Limbaugh should apologize to all women. Many of us have taken birth control medications and it does not mean hat women are sluts or prostitutes. I had extreme periods and birth controls got them under control. His comments were totally inappropriate.
Gloria has got to be at least whispering to herself, "MG, what have I wrought!" John Lennon proved prescient when he said the WL's movement really freed men. Now women are crying they can't have sex because they can't afford it... Tough sh*t...
JABBA The RUSH is an Oxycodone withdrawal caricature whose daily signature projectile hate speech compels intelligent thoughtful people to conclude that he's rabid, ignorant, lunatic blowhard whose rancid opinions and manic reptilian theatrics suggest that his IQ and shoe size are the same number. Al Franken's incisive and amusing book title says it all: RUSH LIMBAUGH IS A BIG FAT IDIOT!
For those of you questioning her estimate of $3000 over three years, please keep in mind the following.
1. Not all birth control pills are interchangeable. Some women can't take certain ones. For example, I don't do well on most hormonal birth control pills and really have had to stick to one specific type.
2. Some women need a new pack every 3 weeks, instead of 4 weeks, because their doctor's recommend skipping the 7 'reminder' pills. There are a variety of medical reasons for this. I am one of these people. Women who do this will have to buy 16 packs instead of 13.
3. My pills cost $68 a pack over the counter.
4. 16 packs at $68 a pack is....$1088 a year.
5. Birth control pills are generally not prescribed without a cervical exam, a pregnancy test and possibly other tests. If insurance doesn't pay for the visit to do this, that could be $200/month out of "?
?Her estiminate of $3000 for three years is perfectly reasonable
As someone pointed out about all this "filthy language" directed at the meeker sex - Obama gladly accepted a $1 million donation from Bill Maher who delights in calling Sarah Palin a cunt. Sounds like someone approves of THAT language.