There is no making lemonade from the lemon-laced story of Josh Powell. You don't find "silver linings" in the story of a father who police say murdered his own sons in cold blood by exploding their Washington home. But even a realist like me didn't think it could get this bad. I didn't think little Charlie and Braden Powell would have to be haunted for all eternity by the man who killed them.
But if plans to bury the deceased father in the same cemetery where his children were laid to rest aren't stopped, that's exactly what will happen. The plot already dug for Powell's casket overlooks the spot where mourners bid a final farewell to the little boys. How outrageous!
Chuck and Judy Cox, the grandparents of the little boy and parents of their mom, Susan Powell, who went missing two years ago, have announced they'll pursue legal action if the cemetery's overseers don't put a stop to it themselves. That means the whole mess is on hold.
Frankly, I'm horrified it got this far to begin with. I get that Josh Powell has to be buried somewhere. I even have sympathy for his family, who are grieving not only the loss of him and his little boys but the loss of something less tangible but no more real: the loss of their dreams. They may once have thought that Josh was a good person. They may not have believed the police who had named Josh the sole "person of interest" in the disappearance of Susan. But when he blew up that house with the little boys inside, they had to face the fact that their family member was indeed a monster.
But out of respect for those little boys, the people planning Josh's burial should have thought about this. Strangers thought about the boys -- Pierce County Sheriff Paul Pastor and Detective Ed Troyer actually bought the plots on either side of Charlie and Braden's final resting place to ensure Josh couldn't be buried there. Why didn't their own family think that way?
And what about the managers of this cemetery? I'll admit I'm not 100 percent sure how discrimination laws play into how plots are sold, but there has to be room for common sense and humanity at the very least. After all, it's a cemetery. Respect for the dead should be their number one priority.
What do you think should be done with Josh Powell's remains?
Image via Natalie Maynor/Flickr
Do People Who Have Kids Deserve Special Treatment?
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Memorial Day Survival Guide
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis

Comments (10)
hopefully his sons have a more forgiving spirit, i think families should remain close. i know what he did is horrible but i don't think his remains should pay his debt to the children.
I am very curious as to how his family is feeling about this.
Josh Powell was a murdering coward. To even suggest that he deserves to be in the same hemisphere with his little angels is disgusting. I'm so glad that Crimestoppers purchased the plots next to Braeden and Charlie. To suggest that a MURDERER be buried next to his VICTIMS is a crime against humanity. I hope they get a judge with common sense and that they bar this from happening.
The POS doesn't even deserve to be buried in a cemetery IMO.
My opinion? I think he should be cremated and his ashes dumped at sea in international waters. But that's just what I think.
I don't think he should be buried in the same cemetary as those poor boys. It's in very poor taste, at the least. There's so much sympathy for the Cox family in the Washington state legal system by now that I forsee a way being found to block his body from being buried there.
Let's look at this from a different point of view: Scott Peterson. Convicted Murderer. Laci Peterson and unborn son Conner mudered in 2002, when Laci was 8 months pregnant. If Scott's family wanted him buried next to Laci and Conner (after his execution), I'm pretty sure there would be equal, if not more, outrage. I'm pretty sure there would be no one asking the Rocha family to "forgive" Peterson, especially no one asking little Conner to forgive his dad for killing him before he had a chance to experience life.
Let's put that into perspective, let it marinade. Josh Powell does not deserve to be buried near his sons, end of story.
They are all dead. How could it possibly matter now? When you start restricting things like this, it is a slippery slope. Next people will say, "We don't want criminals buried near our relatives," or "That person was a religious fanatic, and he shouldn't be buried here." How do you determine who is 'deserving' of a burial plot in a particular location? Who is the person who gets to make the call?
A slippery slope? What are you talking about? I think it should be pretty standard that a murderer should not be buried next to or near their victim(s). It's not that complicated.