One of the very first things President Obama did when he took office in 2009 was sign the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. He remarked signing this legislation was in honor of his own grandmother, “who worked in a bank all her life, and even after she hit that glass ceiling, kept getting up again,” and for his daughters, “because I want them to grow up in a nation that values their contributions, where there are no limits to their dreams.”
I applaud this because I too experienced wage discrimination when I worked in corporate America. I have walked in Ms. Ledbetter’s shoes, and am thankful to have a leader in the Oval Office who wants to better the world for women. Obama is one of the biggest advocates for women’s rights this nation has seen. Based on recent GOP candidates, I am wondering if “Republican feminist” is an oxymoron.
A lot has changed, considering the first three Presidents to support the Equal Rights Amendment were Republicans -- Eisenhower, Nixon, and Ford. This kind of support was short-lived. It all took a turn for the worse for women and the Republican party in 1980. And so began the gender gap in politics. The Republican party will tell you the argument is solely based on abortion, but I imagine there are deeper, underlying issues around sex and women’s changing roles in society. Apparently “traditional family values” means keeping women folk barefoot and pregnant. Rick Santorum has said that “radical feminists” are responsible for undermining families and for trying to persuade women that they could find fulfillment only in the workplace instead of at home.
I am astounded that in the year 2012, women are still fighting for the right to have access to birth control. It astonishes me that many insurance plans do not cover birth control while Viagra and its ilk are covered. Perhaps if there weren’t so many wantonly erectile men out there, women wouldn’t need birth control! I’m just sayin’. And I can’t help but ponder how Newt Gingrich, a man who does not support the use and availability of contraception, has had three wives and only two children. Hmmm....
This recent cadre of Republicans will hurt women in myriad ways. This isn’t just about sexism in politics; this is about creating a society that is dangerous and oppressive to women. Since when are women's rights and human rights not synonymous?
Our bodies. They play political warfare with our bodies and our choices. Our bodies are their pawns. Remember when Republicans wanted to redefine rape? This isn’t over. Gingrich wants a national version of Mississippi’s shunned personhood amendment, making all abortions illegal, even in the case of rape, incest, or to save a woman’s life. It would also potentially outlaw all stem cell research and in vitro fertilization. Gingrich and Santorum have pledged to only appoint pro-life cabinet and executive branch positions. This includes Supreme Court justices, who have a long term effect on the direction of our country. These candidates are not pro-life as much as they are pro-fetus. Where does it end?
Our military service. Rick Santorum thinks women and emotions don’t mix in combat. Has he not heard of the thousands of service men who battle PTSD that menacingly manifest itself as domestic violence and can lead to suicide? To claim that men would focus on being chivalrous instead of focus on combat if women fought beside them is ludicrous. There are some badass soldiers out there, men and women, who do their jobs skillfully, passionately, and fiercely.
Our families. Republicans want to cut the Head Start program that supports low income preschool age kids. Maryland Republicans already support such a plan because women belong at home with their children. Republicans seek to pull funding on Title X, the nation’s only family planning program to provide preventative health services, including contraception, to low income families. And I could write a tome about how these Republican candidates have a one-dimensional definition of family, vowing to make it illegal constitutionally to ban gay marriage.
The GOP candidates simply do not support women. Worse than that, they seek to disenfranchise us. How can they possibly represent us? Oh, but on the bright side, I should tell you that while Republicans do not support access to contraception for women, Representative Dan Burton of Indiana does support providing contraception for wild horses. Paid for with our tax dollars. I can’t make this crap up.
This post is part of a weekly conversation with our 5 Moms Matter 2012 political bloggers. Read the original question and find links to all their responses here: How Will the Next President Affect Women's Rights?
Image via Joyce N. Boghosian/Wikimedia


This Hot Dad Wants to Vacuum Your Rug
This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
















Comments 73
Ummmmm, yeah. Really there are no words to express how ridiculous this article is. It's so silly it's not even worth arguing.......
Goodbye and good riddance then Odds and Tracey, this is so much better and more honest than the Republican tripe so many of you seem to feed on. This is an honest view and statement, try to tell me any of these candidates actually give a damn about women and treating them as equal human beings who should decide their own lives, and I'll laugh at you. The Republican candidates care nothing for women except telling them what to do and what they believe is "moral" and don't bother with them unless they are sleeping with them (inside or outside of marriage) trying to pander their vote, or demanding they make them a sandwich. If you manage with a straight face to say they give a dang about women and don't want to tell us exactly how to live our lives without living by Their beliefs, you're sadly mistaken.
How is this news? I'm 30 years old and have known this about republicans since I was a teenager.
Republicans ONLY support the wealthiest 1%. It has been that way my entire lifetime. They use other platforms to merely gain votes while selling out the middle class to help their cronies get richer.
Not that I have much love for Dems, either... as they like to dole out the entitlements so they can get votes and continue their own self-serving ventures.
But republicans are by far the worst. I have never EVER understood how any woman (who enjoys being able to work, vote, and make their own decisions) could EVER align themselves with the republican party; they have never wanted women to have power and only view us as baby making machines who should only take care of their men and never complain.
You know what the greatest danger to women is? The notion that females need politicians in order to succeed in life. You're a pawn because you bought into the idea that you're a Delicate Flower who needs to be protected by Democrats. Want equality? Stop asking for "protection". :
Since when are women's rights and human rights not synonymous? It's when women like you make them different. When women like you buy into the idea that you are female and therefore less. When women like you complain that you're not being supported by a political group. When women like you need to be empowered, rescued, protected, validated, and otherwise CODDLED in order to succeed.
Sorry about the bold - I couldn't remove it.
For a moment, I was interested in this article because it was talking about equal pay for women, a cause I am very interested in, even as one of those oxymoron Republican "feminists." But then, the article went right to contraceptives and "reproductive rights." Blah blah blah. Listen, reproductive rights are very important, but just because I am not pro-choice does not mean that I don't care about other issues pertaining to women, or that I am vapidly supporting a Republican candidate because "well, gosh, that's who my husband is voting for, so I should follow suit, because my tiny Republican female brain can't make decisions on my own!" Personally, I think implying that a Republican woman is stupid for having her political preferences is awfully offensive. Don't you think that I have the ability and intelligence to make my own decisions, for what is right for myself and my family? I am more than my uterus.