The question of whether the U.S. Dept. of Education should be eliminated is probably not a question that should be answered by looking to the "top" of the pyramid, where getting rid of it makes a sexy soundbite in this 2012 election, but to the "bottom" where students, teachers and parents are experiencing its effects.
Right now, it's playing out as the Republican crusaders are going to halt that out of control Democrat Barack Obama in his tracks before he can cross that line between federal and states rights by using the Department of Education to resolve the impending student loan crisis. Obama lost me when he thought it would be a good idea for the feds to get into the banking, healthcare and auto industries. And I don't know that it's appropriate for the feds to resolve the student loan crisis. But shuttering the department is election year politics and fails to acknowledge that the Department of Education and the "No Child left Behind" act have had bi-partisan support in the past. And specific pieces of it were even voted for or praised by the Republican candidates themselves, including Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum. Most importantly, test scores are rising.
It was a Democrat, President Jimmy Carter, who brought the Dept. of Education back to cabinet level status. But it was Republican George W. Bush who gave it teeth when he helped usher in "No Child left Behind." (That's right folks, a Republican who was concerned that students, especially minorities, were the victims of soft expectations in districts where bad teachers and inadequate funding were often to blame for low test scores.) "No Child left Behind," is an Act of Congress passed by a bi-partisan group spearheaded by Sen. Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts and Rep. John Boehner of Ohio that forces schools to meet certain standards to have access to federal education funds. As an aside, i would like to point out that Boehner and Kennedy are as far right a Republican and as far left a Democrat as we've seen. Proof that our politicians can work together when they try hard enough. (Hey D.C.! Is anybody listening?)
As a parent, the Dept. of Education and No Child left Behind allow you to get your school's report card by going to websites like the following: http://www.greatschools.org/improvement/quality-teaching/61-no-child-left-behind.gs. You can also get free help with reading for your child, transfer to a different school if the school is failing or help teachers get funding for retraining. You could argue that these laws put control, not in the federal government's hands but in the hands of parents, students and teachers.
According to Wikipedia, most states have seen test scores rise since "No Child Left Behind" was enacted. The Department of Education points to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) results, released in July 2005, showing improved student achievement in reading and math:[13]
- More progress was made by nine-year-olds in reading in the last five years than in the previous 28 years combined.
- America's nine-year-olds posted the best scores in reading (since 1971) and math (since 1973) in the history of the report. America's 13-year-olds earned the highest math scores the test ever recorded.
- Reading and math scores for black and Hispanic nine-year-olds reached an all-time high.
- Achievement gaps in reading and math between white and black nine-year-olds and between white and Hispanic nine-year-olds are at an all-time low.
- Forty-three states and the District of Columbia either improved academically or held steady in all categories (fourth- and eighth-grade reading and fourth- and eighth-grade math).
In closing, I would say that, like Planned Parenthood, this is a wonderful issue for Republicans to show their concern for those whose access to quality education is limited because of race, income and geography. Every child should know how to read. And the states and local controls weren't enough. Thank God one Republican was married to a school teacher who cared. Way to go, W! It would be nice if you and the party got credit for caring and if the current crop of candidates could reflect the positive impact Republicans have had on student test scores.
This post is part of a weekly conversation with our 5 Moms Matter 2012 political bloggers. Read the original question and find links to all their responses here: Should the Department of Education Be Abolished?
Image via PTCIA10/Flickr
Do People Who Have Kids Deserve Special Treatment?
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Memorial Day Survival Guide
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis

Comments (10)
Whoa, did you really just quote Wikipedia as a source?
What the first poster said! As a second note, I am a product of the no child left behind act, and let me tell you, I learned more from my own research and after I dropped out of school then I ever did while in it. Because to make the "cut" on test scores, teachers taught to the test. We learned in class ONLY what was needed to pass our tests. It amazed me as I watched this bill go into effect (as a child!) how our science classes went from hands on learning with honest to goodness insect dissections, to paper related tests. No more growing plants and recording observations, nope, we read about how the scientific process worked. Why? Because one way taught us how to do the scientific method, one way taught us how to verbalize it onto a test sheet. Oh, and reading and writing suddenly became about the perfection of how to pass our test. I remember failing an essay section on our aims test in high school here in arizona, and being told to tone down my too adult and too creative writing style so I could pass. Not that my first essay was "bad" or poorly written, I adhered to all rules they set for us, and appealed their decision to fail me. Both my principal, vice principal and three english teachers agreed I should have passed. I dumbed down my second try at this, passed with flying colors. Small words, short sentaces, no creativity got me through. Wonderful life lesson there, be sure to be average!
I fostered a number of teens who scored great on all tests in school, they really did. But they had no idea how that knowledge they learned in class applied to day to day adult life. Kids who could solve a calc problem with ease, but could not figure out a grocery budget. Kids who could pass a language arts test, but couldn't fill in an application for a job, write a coherent and cohesive resume. I had one girl who passed with flying coors all of her school tests, but had the handwriting of afive year old and the writing style of my sister when she was six. I remember a resume she wrote to apply at a riding stable " I like horses. My Step dad has horses. Sometimes I ride them. Horses have pretty tails." ! Mind you, this same girl passed her tests, and had not only ridden, but had been training her own show horses (whom she won numersous competitions on) since she was twelve. She was very qualified for the job she was applying for, but could not verbalize it. Write it out as a bubble sheet? Woulda done fine.
I think that its great test scores have risen. Have life skills? Can kids graduating from high school now all balance their budget, understand credit, know about our current economy? Do they have business skills? Write a resume? Make a pie chart? Know what a business plan is or how to make one? Or can they pass a bubble test really well? And at what point does a test become more important? Are they being shown how those tests (and the skills required in them) apply to adult life? Or are they just doing what they need to get by in school?
Wikipedia? Really? I'm not even going to comment much past this - there are several better-written posts on this subject here on The Stir, which have garnered intelligent discussion. I suspect this one is going to fizzle quickly.
Looks like the USA has some kind of bright future