I admit, I'm wary about going on cruises to begin with. Something about waking up and not being able to see land with the naked eye, pirates, and international waters being lawless just doesn't appeal to me. But one cruise I don't want a G.D. thing to do with, besides the Kate Gosselin cruise, is a Titanic Memorial Cruise.
Apparently, I'm in the minority, though, because, shockingly, every single passenger slot has already been snatched up on this nightmare of a vacation. Who would want to do this?
The ship sets sail on April 8 on this year from Southampton, UK, and will head to the spot where the Titanic sank 100 years ago, on April 15, to spend two full days. It will then (God-willing) continue on the original Titanic's intended route, to Halifax and then on to New York City. The ship is made to look like the original, and people can even dine on the same food the original passengers dined on. Relatives of those who were on the first Titanic will be in attendance, and a memorial service will be held at 2:20 a.m. the night it sunk.
See, the thing about this is it sounds like the exact opposite of a vacation. It sounds like a terrible, panic-strickened mess of a situation, where something's bound to go wrong. I'm all for boning up on history, but I certainly don't want any part of a re-enactment of one of the most tragic events in history. Especially while I'm on vacation. I'm trying to see the other side of this here -- truly, I am -- but I honestly can't. I can only see a giant red flag and a neon sign saying, "Bad Idea Jeans!"
Like I said, though, I'm an anti-cruise person to begin with (and general scaredy-cat), so perhaps I'm biased. I don't really think so, though, because, seriously, I'd take a seven-day Kate Gosselin extravaganza over this any day.
Would you want to go on the Titanic Memorial Cruise?
Image via Jennifurr-Jinx/Flickr
Kourtney Kardashian's Pregnancy Craving Explained
States With the Highest Gas Prices
Why Stephen Colbert's Mom Is 'Tough as Nails' (VIDEO)
Will & Kate Name Their New Dog
Victoria Beckham on Being a Working Mom
Bethenny Frankel's Emotional Miscarriage News (VIDEO)
10 Pinterest Accounts to Follow -- Now
Concerns About Baby Bumbo Seats
Whitney Houston's Family Sells Funeral Footage
Is La Leche League Anti-Dad? (VIDEO)
Elizabeth Smart's Wedding Details
Scrumptious Chocolate Peanut Butter Layer Cake
Perfect Tribute to Whitney Houston (VIDEO)
Infants' Tylenol Recall: What You Need to Know (VIDEO)
Adorable Couple Marries at Local Walmart (VIDEO)

Comments (30)
Wow. I'm a ghoul, and I wouldn't want to take this cruise. Good luck to all aboard...
I think it will mean a lot to some of the family members, but I personally would never have anything to do with that. Eek.
See, I totally would! Something about reliving history would be fascinating, exciting, everything all at once. I'm sure this time around, they fixed that pesky lifeboat situation. I'm not worried! It'll be an awesome event.
Two days floating around the same spot in the middle of the ocean? No thanks. I'd rather watch a documentary about it.
I'm a HUGE fan of the Titanic. No way in the 7 levels of hell would I go on that. Sorry Titanic, Britannic, sinking with years of each other I'm good thanks. I'll stay in my nice safe landlocked state!!!
Something is not bound to happen. The advances in ship navigation, captain/crew training and electronics on board a cruise ship are leaps and bounds beyond what they were then.
Aside from that, global warming has lent its hand to the decrease in enormous icebergs.
Also, we know now that most of the icebergs bulk lies under the water and so most cruise ships that are bound for areas with icebergs have a warning system in place to warn the captain and crew of that.
I'd go in a heartbeat. But, I'm funny, I like to socialize with other people and not sit in front of my computer and prosthelize about things that will never happen. (in other words, you need to get out more)
Sure, I'd go. The Titanic was a groundbreaking sinking in changing international law regarding ships; ships are now required to adhere to requirements in safety. They are required to have enough life boats, life jackets, and other life-saving devices on board, as well as radios and satellite emergency equipment. Plus, hindsight is 20/20. Excessive speed was a huge factor in the sinking, as well as using a type of steel for the hull that becomes brittle in cold water and buckled under the impact. I doubt they'd try to replicate the ship exactly. And even if it did sink, I doubt we'd see as many deaths as in the original crash.