Leslie Bennetts' eye-opening and spot-on post "American Moms: Unsung Heroes of a Bad Economy," which features several stories of women struggling to make ends meet, should be emailed to and read by every single politician on the campaign trail today -- including our President. It evoked so many different emotions and had me nodding my head after almost every paragraph. But one issue affecting these moms and so many others like them jumped out at me more than the others, and that is the good old day care dilemma. Difficulty affording day care has not gone away, it's only gotten worse in this dismal economy. Many women are -- or want to be -- working moms either for the salary or benefits but can't afford to pay someone to care for their children. Fully funded day care where the government picks up the entire tab would be one of the best ways politicians could help moms and our country today.
I don't pretend to know how such an endeavor would be carried out. We're talking a budgetary and logistical scope the size of Social Security or even Health Care. We all know how well that's turned out.
That aside, the concept itself makes perfect sense.
Oh, the government helps us out a little right now, depending on how much we make. We can save a few thousand a year through our dependent care savings accounts (if our jobs offer that benefit) and can take advantage of (ever dwindling) tax credits. But that hardly makes a dent. Paying for day care in many places is like carrying a second mortgage -- I've been there. And if you have two kids in day care at the same time like I did, forget about it. Bye-bye savings account. I made too much and not little enough to justify quitting my job and staying home, as much as I would have loved to have been a stay-at-home mom. And I needed the benefits. What little extra I brought home at least bought some groceries, and it was a "future investment" for the time when my kids would eventually be in public school and time to start thinking about how I would send them to college.
So why not "public day care" as well? Just extend the current public education system to start a few years earlier. If I had that when my kids were little, I wouldn't be in debt right now. I'll bet lots of moms wouldn't be. I'd have been able to renovate my home and invest in the stock market. This system wouldn't just help the individual. The government and children's services could keep closer tabs on the children who need that supervision the most if a staff saw them daily while their moms were working, helping to pay off their debts, keep their homes, and maybe go on a vacation once a year. Airlines would like that and add flights and more jobs. The economy would improve, new businesses could start up, and things might eventually start to get better.
Is this simplistic thinking fraught with more questions than answers? Yes, of course. But someone's got to start throwing some radical new solutions out there, so it might as well be me, a mom, who, like the others in Bennetts' post, is struggling yet trying to be patient, and is trying to smile while seriously doubting things are going to get better any time soon.
Would you vote for a politician who proposed publicly funded day care? Would you send your child to a free day care if you had the choice?
Image via GabrielaP93/Flickr


Ashley Is a Widow Who Stays Strong...
This Hot Dad Wants to Vacuum Your Rug
This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
















Comments 32
IDK as much as I like the idea i feel like it would never work. Some where there would be some one who stays at home, never looking for a job, and accepting government assistance who would be signing her kids up and over burdening the system. All so she can have 8 hours of "me" time a day. I can just imagine all the working moms who wouldn't get into the program because it would be filled with people taking advantage of the system. This would be the same lady who give people on food stamps or in HUD housing a bad name. The kind of lady who's the subject of 90% of the parenting posts on The Stir. She would ruin it for everyone, just like she ruins everything else. On the plus side, at least the children would be away from the really bad parents for some of the day and perhaps a few tradgedies could be avoided.
@Maevelyn I'm sure you would have to present proof of employment, although some people would scam the system, I don't think a lot of people would be able to get away with it.
I so would NOT support a government run day care...they can't run anything successfully.
I think that would be so wonderful. I pay $500 a month for one child to go to daycare. it is so hard when your making 7.35 an hour. That only leaves me $300 a month to pay my bills which is almost impossable. This would be a life saver for someone like me.
It's the parent's job to take care of their children, not taxpayers. How could anyone see this as being any different than welfare? We're suppose to be fixing the debt, not adding to it.
No. No NO NO! This sort of crap is exactly what's wrong with America.
First of all, the government doesn't "pick up the entire tab" for anything - tax payers do, and we already don't have enough tax payers to pay for all the entitlements. If we taxed every working American at 100% of their income, we wouldn't have enough money to pay for all the "free stuff".
Second, the government is inefficient and ineffective, so that "free" child care is going to be expensive and poor quality. Take a look at foster care system to see how well the government takes care of kids.
Third, and probably most important - stop expecting the government to be your sugar daddy and take care of everything so you can skip through life. Seriously - grow up, take responsibility for yourself and your situation, and quit sticking your hand out.
I like the idea for personal fiscal reasons. Just like you, I'm in the middle. Sending my two sons to daycare/preschool costs ALMOST what I make. I have a few hundred left over after taxes to pay for the gas it takes me to get to work (good going DC area for having the wrost traffic in the world) and perhaps some food....
But, my salary also pays for the insurance. Its much cheaper through my employer than through my husband's. Besides, I don't want to ruin my career now by staying home. Losing this job I may or may not be able to replace in a few years...I'm not taking that chance in this economy.
So, I'm in this delimma. My salary is JUST ENOUGH. But, I still make too much for any sort of assistance. Which, I think politicians should really amend.....THE AREA YOU LIVE IN MAKES A HUGE DIFFERENCE where the poverty line should be. Someone living in the boonies of North Carolina can live off of a meager salary...but if you live in DC....$40,000/year leaves you worse off than the NC man making $20g. But I digress.
My only caveat with this plan is that unfortunately, many things the government runs are "half-run". I don't know if I would be comfortable with the US goverment sanctioned anything taking care of my children. Perhaps, if this was Canada or the UK where government social programs were run by competent people. But not here. I just can't bring myself to think it would be OK.