It's the story of two mothers. One a former town mayor and all around upstanding citizen named Linda Lusk who is grieving the death of her child, born with trisomy 13, a serious birth defect that claimed his life at 15. The other, Heidi Frank, a mom dealing with the fact that Linda Lusk pled guilty to sexually abusing her 14-year-old son, Bubba. Now, which one do you pity more?
The knee-jerk response in me, as a mother, especially in the midst of the disgusting Jerry Sandusky child abuse scandal, is to say that anyone who dares abuse a child is pond scum. No! Lower than pond scum. But life is never as black and white as a first impression -- no matter how visceral the reaction, is it?
Linda Lusk's son Taylor was diagnosed with Trisomy 13 in the womb. With symptoms that range from severe mental retardation to heart defects, many doctors will suggest a mother abort a Trisomy 13 fetus because their challenges make them incompatible with life. Lusk was told at the boy's delivery that he wouldn't live past a week, but he made it to 15 before dying while she was at work one day.
That story, by itself, makes the mother in me weep. That's my visceral, knee-jerk, first reaction. Linda Lusk gets my sympathy because she's been through a trauma that no parent should ever have to suffer. We aren't supposed to bury our kids. Period.
Now consider what happened with Bubba, her daughter's 14-year-old friend, who has bragged around town that the former mayor had oral sex with him, who says that she did not take advantage of him. Whatever he says, he's wrong. A 51-year-old woman sleeping with a child is taking advantage. What Lusk admits to doing fits every definition of abuse.
It is disgusting. It is wrong. Our inclination to grab the pitchforks and march to Prosser, Washington to protest are completely within reason. I stand with Heidi Frank in saying her son deserved better.
But does that completely negate the other hardship in Linda Lusk's life and wipe away all sympathy? Isn't it possible to have pity for Linda Lusk's troubles as a mother that run concurrent through our minds with our horror and disgust?
This is the gray area in life. Her grief doesn't excuse her alleged actions -- although Lusk and husband Kevin are trying to say it does. But as a human being, I can't ignore the fact that it happened. I can separate the two issues.
Can you? Do you have someone in your life who you both hate and pity -- the way I feel about Linda Lusk?
Image via steakpinball/Flickr
Do People Who Have Kids Deserve Special Treatment?
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Memorial Day Survival Guide
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis

Comments (111)
I normally agree with you on most issues, Jeanne, but I absolutely cannot agree with you on this.
Whether she suffered tremendous grief or not, she knew right from wrong, and on some level, she knew her actions would have consequences that went far beyond potential jail time. That's the paraphrase definition of "culpability."
She lost her son and it's tragic, but the boy who lived (forgive the HP reference) will never be the same. When her son died she could have started unhealthy habits like smoking, drinking, etc. or she could done something positive and educated other families on this disease, the risks, etc. and become an advocate.
Instead, she took advantage of a child she was responsible for, and now that child stands a greater chance of becoming a substance abuser or a people abuser himself, and statistically speaking has very little chance of forming positive, loving adult relationships.
Other than self-defense, in no way would I excuse any crime against another person. Seeing that sexual abuse is not a defensive action, I can't help but lose all sympathy for her. I've heard of abusers growing up being abused and then excusing their behavior that way, but this doesn't even connect. There should be no excuse for her actions. Yes she suffered the loss of her son, but how does that excuse sexually abusing a boy who should be treated like a son? Would she have done this to her own son? Shouldn't the loss of her son make her more protective of her stepson?
If a couple has a child that subsequently died, would the father be excused if he went on to sexually abuse his stepchild? Somehow, I don't think so. Just because she is a woman who lost her child, we should not excuse her criminal actions against another child.
You have to be kidding me... I don't have a SINGLE ounce of sympathy for this woman. Not an iota. I feel sorry for her baby, and sorry for the abused child and his family. the end. I swear the writers here post off the wall crap like this sometimes just to make sure they have created enough controversy to flood their post with comments. I truly hope you are not this far gone. I wonder if your bleeding heart would be so kind if it was your son that had been abused...? This post falls into the "get a grip on reality" category...
I DON'T CARE WHAT TRAUMA THIS WOMAN HAS BEEN THROUGH!!! You Realized by giving her a pass of oh more you your son just died your basically giving every Pedophile the pass. Oh poor you your mother has cancer I know you didn't mean to rape that 9 year old girl it's only because your mother has cancer. Who cares if you caused trauma to a child you've faced trauma to. Eff that!!! I hope she gets what she deserves and it sure isn't sympathy whether it's her stepson or her daughters es-boyfriend~!!!!
* wow I mean ex-boyfriend...way to early for me apparently!!!
Ok there needs to be better fact-checking before publishing by the writers on this blog, but my opinion still holds. There is no excuse for what she did. If a man the same age committed those same actions toward a 14-year-old girl (or boy), people would be sharpening their pitchforks right now. Teen girls and boys do try to "seduce" older people sometimes, but it is the responsibility of the older parties to not act on those advances and alert the proper people (parents, school offiacials, etc.) before things go this far. If a man was sexting a teen girl, people would be horrified if he got such a light sentence.