Taken out of context, this story of a Muslim-American woman and mother of three booted off a Southwest Airlines flight is truly disgusting.
The way she herself tells it, Irum Abbasi was on a flight about to depart from San Diego to San Jose, talking on her cellphone. She told the person on the line, "I've got to go," and hung up the phone. A flight attendant nearby, however, thought she said, "It's a go," which apparently qualifies as "suspicious behavior." And, the fact that Abbasi was wearing a hijab only guaranteed that she was escorted off the airplane by the TSA that much faster.
It's disgusting that people are so prejudiced against difference that something as baseless as a traditional head scarf and a seemingly innocuous three-word phrase would be grounds for removal. What makes the story even more infuriating is that Southwest has had its fair share of diversity scandals of late including discriminating against same-sex couples and kicking an overweight person off a plane.
But the context of the story that needs to be filled in is that we don't know the flight attendant's version of the story. Even more important, Southwest has every right to remove anyone they perceive to be a threat to their passengers. And, to be fair, the airline put her on the very next flight and issued an apology. Seen in that light, you've got to wonder if Abbasi's subsequent lawsuit against the airlines is an overreaction of sorts.
Yes, it's true: Abbasi is actually suing Southwest for discrimination and has said she wants the crew disciplined. And while I can think of a million other reparations that Southwest could give her and would be appropriate in this situation -- a public apology, a lifetime of free airline tickets, a promise of company-wide diversity training -- a settlement, at least in this case, seems like overkill.
Image via sittiealiah/Flickr


This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
This Hot Dad Cooks AND Does the Dishes
Kanye West is Gay?!
















Comments 286
This is why I'm boycotting airflight. I will never fly again as long as airliners and TSA continue to treat regular people like criminals. You know what, if it's not safe to fly without those measures, it's just not worth it.
ANOTHER post by CafeMOM being anti-Islam go figure..
@hoticedcoffee - i totally agree. look, it could have been a simple misunderstanding and everyone moved on. the woman wasn't violated, they didn't trample all over her rights of any kind (flying is not a right!) and they rectified it in the best way they could. just because we don't know about them offering her free flights doesn't mean that they didn't offer it. (for the record, i've seen cases where an offended party was offered something in turn, but the offended party felt it wasn't "enough"... i wonder if that is the case here).
i love that we can be overly cautious about so many other things and defend them so angrily (helicopter parenting, anyone?) but then when we apply that same level of caution elsewhere it's a big damn deal about her ethnicity. for the love of!! we're never going to win this one. they should just ground all the planes and only allow travel by land and sea from now on. <eyeroll>
...purely in order to strike while our defenses are down and kill us. It's their life's mission. She chooses to ally herself with these people in her appearance. This is a new phenomenon relatively speaking, and there is no set of politically correct rules that can be applied to this. The onus is on her to behave in a way that reassures us she means no harm.
Or, in plain English.. we have been disoriented by suckee punches from her people and we are now in survival mode as is only human! Its been reduced to raw human instinct now.. survival first, sit and reason I have the abstract about our enemies' rights later. Its how the human brain is wired.