Last week, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) downgraded the credit rating of the United States from AAA to AA+. This marks the first time in U.S. history that this has ever happened. We even managed to keep our credit rating under President Carter, when mortgage interest rates were well into the double digits and you could only buy gas on certain days of the week.
But does it matter?
S&P is a credit rating agency that, well, rates the credit-worthiness of public and private corporations, and issues reports and grades based on their analysis. They use statistics to figure out if someone is more or less likely to pay back any money they borrow. The higher the score, the more likely someone is to not default on their loans.
If you’ve ever made a major purchase like a car or a house, you know that higher credit scores translate into better interest rates, among other goodies like bankers not laughing in your face when you turn in a credit application. The higher your credit score, the more trustworthy you are to a lender.
A triple-A rating is the highest one issued by S&P, and was enjoyed by the United States for close to a century. Experts disagree on what the downgrade to AA+ means; some say it doesn’t matter much, while others say this is a serious wake-up call to politicians to stop throwing us deeper into debt.
One thing is certain: Despite the increase in the debt ceiling last week, economic uncertainty still looms. Businesses are still not hiring. The stock market is ... not doing well. We are still borrowing over 40 percent of every dollar we spend.
The issue is how much we spend, not how much we can borrow. S&P Chief David Beers says the downgrade is not about either political party; it’s about the spending. The entitlement spending is out of control and about to get worse with the first round of baby boomers retiring this year, Obamacare coming into full effect soon, and ATMs continuing their rampage against the economy.
Just kidding on that last one. I think.
Do People Who Have Kids Deserve Special Treatment?
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Memorial Day Survival Guide
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis

Comments (7)
David Beers may not be laying blame, but the press release from S&P did:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail?entry_id=94858
This current mess lies squarely on the shoulders of the GOP and Tea Partiers in Congress who seem hell bent on driving our country to destruction just so they can blame it on Obama. It's really pathetic and we are all going to pay a very steep price for it.
I really wish I could be so clueless as to blame this on one party or the other. It is much bigger than that. Politicians at large seem to lack any common sense. Until we get some real person in some offices with some good ole down to earth common sense; that realizes the debt isn't going to go away until we cut the excess and the wasteful luxury that those at the top enjoy, we aren't going to see any change. Except, of course, the few pennies that most of our savings accounts have been reduced to.
This current mess lies squarely on the shoulders of the GOP and Tea Partiers in Congress
Only a non-thinker could make that statement....I can certainly see how "tiny" works into your moniker. The GOP in general and Tea Party members in particular are deeply rooted in the ideals of smaller government and LESS SPENDING. There's no way to blame this situation on them - they didn't triple the deficit over the last 2 years, Obama did. They didn't fail to pass a budget and address these issues, the Democrats did. They didn't refuse to cut spending, Obama and The Left did. This "issue" begins and ends with Obama and his ilk. It may have been decades in the making, but when the shit was about to hit the fan, instead of taking steps to fix problems, Obama piled on more shit and put the fan on "high", then had the audacity to claim he's blameless....right before he left for vacation.
hoticedcoffee-not agreeing with you does not equate being a "non-thinker". Nice of you to make nasty personal slams against someone you don't even know. Is this how you teach your children to behave? At any rate, the Tea Party was hell bent on driving the debt ceiling debate to the brink of a total shutdown just to further their own political agenda. The GOP is so cowed by them and so intent on pandering to big business and the coservative base that they were too afraid to step-up and do the right thing. And now, we have the credit rating downgrade and the stock market tanking in response. That's definitely great for the Country.
At any rate, the Tea Party was hell bent on driving the debt ceiling debate to the brink of a total shutdown just to further their own political agenda. T
And what is that agenda? Smaller, sustainable government with less spending and a balanced budget. If you've paid ANY attention to why we were downgraded, you would know the reason is THE LEVEL OF DEBT we are carrying, and the current administration's perceived inability or unwillingness to reign it in. That is not the faulth of the GOP or the Tea Party. That's Obama's fault, with his vow to veto any bill that came across his desk that raised the debt ceiling and had cuts attached to it. He wanted, and held out for, just raising the ceiling. So we'd be in this mess if he gotten it all his way, too. All the blame, squarely in his court.