President Obama and other prominent liberals really want to raise taxes on the wealthy. Just last week, Obama mocked Republicans for wanting to shrink the $1.5 trillion deficit with spending cuts. He said:
[A] significant number of Republicans of Congress are insisting on a different approach. A cuts-only approach. An approach that doesn’t ask the wealthiest Americans or biggest corporations to contribute anything at all.
Which was totally news to me, because I didn’t know that wealthy Americans didn’t pay taxes. I was under the impression that the top 1 percent of earners paid 37 percent of the income tax. Pesky facts, always getting in the way of rhetoric.
In fact, it’s only the top half of earners that contribute to the income tax. The bottom 47 percent doesn’t pay any income tax at all. What was that about shared sacrifice again?
At first glance, it could seem reasonable to ask those that have the most to give the most. After all, aren’t our bosses making money off of our work? Why shouldn’t they be asked to give some of that back to help those less fortunate than themselves?
Because those people did nothing to earn it.
Every dollar that my employer is forced to give to the government to spend on scammers or studying shrimp on treadmills is a dollar that my employers can’t give me or another employee for a job well done. Employers want to grow; they want to hire new people and they want to reward the good ones so that they stay.
Being human, I crave positive reinforcement. If I work my hiney off, I want to be compensated for it. Crazy, I know. When my employer’s taxes go up, I can kiss that raise goodbye. It’s being spent on welfare queens now.
What’s fair about that?
Image via yomanimus/Flickr
Do People Who Have Kids Deserve Special Treatment?
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Memorial Day Survival Guide
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis

Comments (36)
I don't understand a lot of what goes on in Washington DC, and I don't pretend to, but it does seem like they're kind of stuck in a cycle. And it's not working. They seem to keep doing the same things over and over again, but they're not fixing anything. The debt is rising, the budget is shrinking. That's the impression I'm getting. What gives?
You know what I think? I think they should stop promotng taxing the 'undeserving' rich, and should be taxing the CRAP out of imports. Great for two reasons-
1) Tax revenue. If we need it- lets get it this way
and
2) Reward and foster the American economy by giving incentives to have your company/manifacturing/etc. working on US soil.
As it is, I'd rather see waaaaaay more spending cuts then further taxation. One of the hard things about 'Big Government' is that when it gets to the size it is NOW, people (and their lives) are dependant on it. And they will do anything to ensure that it continues to grow so people continue to get the programs and services they feel they 'need'. While many of the programs are, indeed, wonderful- it doesn't mean the goverment should be paying for them... as it is now. :/
@ethans_momma : couldn't have said it better myself. can i vote for you? :)
i have to agree... there's so much taxation and the cost of employing Americans raises every year... but the cost overseas is far cheaper and there's less of a 'tenure' mentality there (although in this economy, 'tenure' is laughable really). but if you make it cost MORE to employ those folks... and promote having jobs in the US... well you sorta get two birds with one stone. increased revenue from the importing and more jobs available in the us market, meaning less people dependent on government programs.
oh, but that would require that Washington get out of big business' pocket. that's kinda hard. :S