So gas prices are still going up. Which totally sucks, by the way. Because it means that some other lines on our budgets are going to have to be cut. Road trip this summer? Maybe not. Braces for your crooked-toothed adolescent? Not so much. Date night? Hope you like walks in the park, because dinner and a movie might not be financially feasible with $4 a gallon gasoline.
We are all making cuts to our budgets to cover the cost of filling our tanks. Which leads one to ponder … what would cut the cost of fuel?
Electric and hybrid costs would certainly cut the cost, since they use far less fuel (if any) than their conventional internal combustion counterparts. Unfortunately, they also cost far more than their gas-guzzling buddies, so you’re not really going to be saving any money.
The only way to reduce the cost of fuel is to increase the supply of it. In 2009, we imported over half of our petroleum, mostly from Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, and Nigeria. That’s ridiculous in a country that’s as resource rich as the United States, and even more so in our flailing economy. If we drilled right here, we’d create hundreds of thousands of jobs, plus reduce the cost of doing business, since fuel would be cheaper.
Take a look at this video from MomThink.org:
Critics say that drilling isn’t the answer because it would take ten years for the oil to reach the market. They’ve been saying this for the last 40 years or so. If we’d started the process then, we’d have had cheaper gas for the last three decades. You have to start somewhere. In the meantime, think of what it would mean for the unemployment rate. A lot of employees are needed to build those rigs, after all.
But what about the safety risks to humans and to the environment? How can we forget about last year’s rig explosion and subsequent unpluggable leak in the Gulf of Mexico? It killed eleven men, injured seventeen others, and generally wrecked havoc in the Gulf States. How can we possibly consider drilling for more oil when disasters could happen?
It’s a good thing that automobiles weren’t banned after the first fatal car crash. Otherwise we’d still all be riding horses.
In the Deepwater Horizon incident, both BP and our government mucked things up. Safety protocols were neither followed nor enforced. It was a tragic accident that never should have happened, but it is not an excuse to block progress. We need more oil to grease the wheels of our economy, and lucky for us, we have it. We just have to go get it.
Drill, baby, drill.
Image via MomThink


This Hot Dad Wants to Vacuum Your Rug
This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
















Comments 11
I've been saying this for a while, lol. :)
Because then we'll still have oil when the rest of the world runs out. Economically speaking, it's a fantastic idea. When OPEC runs dry, then we'll open our oil fields, and have a monopoly on the supply. Talk about a revenue increase. That doesn't help with the US economic crisis now, but when has the government every really been worries about its citizens? It's worried about the bottom line, and keeping our oil fields closed protects their future economic interests.
You're polishing the brass on the Titanic. Oil will not last for long regardless. Instead of destroying ANWR, why not invest in sustainable energy that won't blow up in our faces?
Is that you, Sarah Palin?
To Mike M -
BTW, my husband and I happen to enjoy walks in the park for our date night, even LONG before gas prices got so expensive. I believe it is those date night walks and family walks in the park that bring us all closer together - rather than staring at some movie screen ignoring each other. (All that walking has also kept the whole family slim and trim)
Yes, oil is a finite resource. Yes, we should be investigating sustainable technology. But the reality is, sustainable technology isn't "there" yet. Those batteries in the hybrid vehicles? No better for the environment than drilling for oil. You simply trade one problem for another, and the second is still financially prohibitive.
Sustainable technology requires a LOT of money, to pay for research, prototypes, salaries, etc. Our country is on the brink of absolute failure because our economy is in the toilet. Like it or not, oil is the only option we have AT THE PRESENT MOMENT until those sustainable technologies catch up.
It is wonderful and optimistic to say "we should use sustainable technologies", and it is also incredibly naive. They are prohibitively expensive, and puts us in the same place we were before, since the unemployment rate is so high, and nobody is getting raises. It is completely unaffordable to the average American. Until those sustainable technologies catch up, nobody is going to use them. And until we improve our economy, there isn't going to BE any money to invest in them. It's a catch-22.
And just because you're paying $1.00+ per litre in Europe doesn't mean that we have to stand for it in America. You don't like it? Work to change it, just like we are.
Maybe we could use the RIDICULOUS subsidies and tax breaks given to oil companies to fund the research for sustainable technology.