Michele Bachmann Thinks We Had It Better Under Slavery


Michele BachmannMichele Bachmann is back out there proving she's completely un-electable as president. Today in what history lesson did the Minnesota Republican ignore in elementary school, we discover Bachmann thinks black Americans were actually BETTER OFF during the slavery era. Oh, sorry, perhaps I should have warned you to swallow all liquids before reading this, lest they be spit across the computer screen?

I guess I just supposed Michele Bachmann's name would clue you in. This is, after all, the same woman who thought the nation's founders "worked tirelessly against slavery" ... when the average fifth grader knows Washington and Jefferson were slaveowners. This time, though, Bachmann has really put her foot in it.

The first presidential candidate to put her name on a pledge from uber-conservative group The Family Leader called “The Marriage Vow -- A Declaration of Dependence Upon Marriage and Family," Bachmann was signing her name to a document that's anti-same sex marriage, anti-Islam, anti-abortion, anti-divorce, etc. On the flip side, it's pro-family, pro-fidelity, and pro-discrimination.

It's so "pro-family," in fact, that the folks who drafted it think life was better way back in the dark ages, when Americans of color were not people but property ... all because they weren't aborting their babies or, gasp, having babies out of wedlock. Here's just a sample from the pledge that Bachmann signed her name to:

Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American President.

The dizzying logic that prompted this comparison fits right in with a presidential candidate who once tried comparing our economy to the horrors of the Holocaust (you guessed it, that was Bachmann), but that doesn't mean it makes even the slightest bit of sense.

Technically, it's true: babies born under slavery might have had two parents. Might, because, let's face it, back under slavery, two slaves were encouraged to be married not because they loved each other but because someone who owned them thought it was a good idea to keep the men from running.

These kids were likely to have a mom who was just a kid herself too -- slave women were known to start having kids at just 13 years old. And they were likely to be one of many kids, because slave owners would dangle a mother's freedom over her head if she promised to produce a whole slew of kids to work the plantation. Because, of course, those parents weren't free to raise their kids the way they wanted. They were someone else's property, and so were the kids.

Just reading all that unpleasantness, it's no wonder Bachmann tends to skip sections of the past that don't jive with the way her speech is going. I don't like to think that Americans treated other human beings like that. But the fact is, it happened. And I'm willing to bet the average American would rather their kid be living in a single parent household than be a piece of property.

But Bachmann signed her name to this pledge. She acknowledged the existence of slavery, and admitted she thinks it wasn't all that bad ... at least not compared to being a single mom in 2011.

So ... do you still want to vote for her?


Image via Olympus Photography by Massimo/Flickr

politics, barack obama, human rights


To add a comment, please log in with

Use Your CafeMom Profile

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Comment As a Guest

Guest comments are moderated and will not appear immediately.

ArmyGal ArmyGal

That is just disgusting. Well if she was living in the times she so admires we wouldn't be hearing her crap. Women didn't have any rights either.

alisa... alisabethjaimes

I have met and seen many idiots in my lifetime, but Bachmann is the most moronic of them all.

mojoe... mojoe12776

So by her logic its better to be the child of a two parent household than a single parent even though your mom is probably being raped repeatedly by the plantation owner and dad is whipped mercilessly for no reason at all other then the color of his skin? Yeah Ill be skipping that name on the ballot.

Justa... Justamom283

She is absolutely ridiculous. How does she think she can be the leader of a country if she keeps refusing to be thorough in her research of what she puts her name to and what comes out of her mouth. There aren't enough words to express how utterly ridiculous of an act this is on her part. 

Allison Priest Leonard

I don't think they were trying to say that African Americans were "better off" as slaves, but rather, making a point that while society has come a long way in some respects, in others it has fallen tragically short. While the institution of slavery has been eradicated in the U.S., the African American family has been torn apart. Do I think they should have used that example? No, because it does sound insensitive and stupid. But I do see what they were trying to say.

nonmember avatar al

Um but what does being african american have to do with divorce rates or being in a single family household? pretty sure most white people are doing the exact. same. thing.

meatb... meatball77

Did she not read it or is she really that racist.

Brandi Cryer

No Allison she meant exactly what she said. Do not try to explain away her idiocy and racism.

kisse... kisses5050

Ohhhhh my. ANNNNNd yet there are people who think we should give 16 year olds the right to vote?  They are the only ones who would say " ohhhhh I see what she is trying to say. I get it"

Justa... Justamom283

@Allision you're right it is insensitive and stupid and that's the point. She should have never put her name with that pledge if she wants to be elected.

And to the point of what The Family Leader is trying to say the fact that they even included that as part of their justification should let you know that their intention is not necessarily for the survival of families. It is strictly for the pushing of their idea of a family. 

1-10 of 36 comments 1234 Last