Follow The Stir

Welcome to California, The Welfare State

by Jenny Erikson on April 30, 2011 at 8:30 AM

california stateCalifornia is one of the most generous states in the nation toward illegal immigrants, teachers, the unemployed, and single mothers. It’s also just about bankrupt. As the saying goes, it’s easy to be generous with other people’s money. 

One of the biggest money pits that the oh-so-generous California taxpayers are funding is the state workers’ pension fund. California public employees have some of the cushiest retirement packages around. These so-called public employees often get fatter paychecks in retirement than they did when they were working.

The Golden State? The Welfare State seems more appropriate.

Something is horribly wrong with California’s pension system, and unless something is done to reform it (soon!) the pyramid scheme will collapse. Early retirement ages combined with longer life expectancies means that retirees often collect more checks during retirement than they did during employment. This is not a pension -- this is welfare.

No one needs to retire at the ripe-old age of 55 and receive an average of 75% of their last annual salary for the rest of their life. California is unique in this, as all other states average salaries over the last 3-5 years on the job when determining pension payouts. Because of this ‘one year’ rule, California retirees are often able to artificially inflate their salary by switching to a high-earning job for one year, or cashing out years worth of accrued vacation time.

The city of Bell, CA has spent some time in the news recently for their outrageous abuse of pensions, but that city is hardly unique in the state. Some other atrocities examples include Bruce Malkenhorst, a former Vernon city administrator, who pulls in $500,000 annually with his pension, the former chief San Diego city librarian that will fleece city taxpayers of $6 million plus over the next 25 years, and the 5,600 or so state employees who are double-dipping by concurrently collecting both a salary and a pension.

This truly is the Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous … on a government pension. The California chapter of Americans for Prosperity is currently touring the state to raise awareness of pension abuse and the imminent need for reform. It won’t be an easy battle, but it’s one that must be waged, in the legislature, in the courts, and at the ballot box. A financial meltdown in one of the nation’s most resource-rich states will benefit no one.


Image via Calsidyrose/Flickr

 

Filed Under: economy, in the news, media, politics, taxes

Comments

19
  • Marjc...
    --

    Marjchaos

    April 30, 2011 at 10:25 AM
    Wow, you sure hate people.
  • butte...
    --

    butterflymkm

    April 30, 2011 at 10:26 AM
    Holy shit I actuall (kind of) agree with you. To a point. Are they drawing social security and a pension? I think a pension is fine but no one NEEDS $500,000 dollars a year to live. They should recieve something much more reasonable for the area. I don't have a dollar figure in mind as I don't live in CA so I don't know what's required as a living wage there. They should recieve a flat amount depending on the cost of living in the area. And they should be required to work te job for a longer period.
  • hotic...
    --

    hoticedcoffee

    April 30, 2011 at 11:15 AM

    Great article, Jenny - it's hard to believe anyone (besides, of course, the blood-suckers who are on the take in CA or elsewhere cough<<marjchaos>>cough) can think this is anything other than outrageous. Looking forward to seeing country-wide reform on unions and pensions.  Recently MA legislature voted to reduce the bullying...I mean bargaining.....rights of public workers in that state.  HUGE local news that isn't getting any national coverage, due to the media bias and the fact that Massachusetts has always been a haven of Liberal Love.


  • jalaz77
    --

    jalaz77

    April 30, 2011 at 12:10 PM
    One of several reasons Cali has never appealed to me. Living or visiting.
  • mumma...
    --

    mummajenni

    April 30, 2011 at 12:23 PM
    for an average of 30 years, public employees contribute 8-10% of their salary (mandatory, off the top) to the pension fund. I wonder what that would be worth in a 401k after 30 years of stable management?

    Abuses aside, it's not like public employee pensioners --in any state-- are receiving free money. Which is what welfare is...

    'Ladies': being opinionated is fine, but get some facts straight first, or you are just asking to be bitch slapped.
  • Anon
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Anon

    April 30, 2011 at 12:30 PM
    mummajenni, at least in my state, teachers are exempt from paying social security because the pension is supposed to be instead of SS. So what you should really be comparing to is what they would get on social security, not from a fat 401K.
  • deadp...
    --

    deadpplrmyhero

    April 30, 2011 at 1:02 PM

    I would never live there. 


  • mumma...
    --

    mummajenni

    April 30, 2011 at 3:11 PM
    The FICA rate for up to $106800 in earnings is less than half of what a public employee pension contribution rate is, so, no, I don't think that's an accurate comparison. And if you think 401k's are "fat" you must neither have one, nor understand how they are managed.
  • angev...
    --

    angevil53

    April 30, 2011 at 4:07 PM

    welfare is free and is overly abused, pensions are worked for. yes people don't need that much money to live on and if there were better about mandating it it will last longer but i would never call it welfare.


  • Marjc...
    --

    Marjchaos

    April 30, 2011 at 6:17 PM
    I live in california. I dont tgink you understand us at all. Do you also believe police should be an optional privatized service? If you cant pay, then it is okay to murder you because nobody will stop them? What you are tlking about is not government, it is anarchy. Anrcarchy will lways destroy the good, the old and the weak.
1-10 of 19 comments

To leave a comment, log in as a CafeMom member:

Log In

OR, use our non-member comment form: