
Jenny EriksonIn the last week of any given December, I can usually be found scrambling to get everything done that must be done before that ball drops at Midnight on the 31st and all of a sudden, it’s a new year. Basically, I spend the week making sure that anything we need to claim on our taxes for that calendar year is out the door and in the mailbox.
One of the biggest parts of this process is making sure that we’re ‘caught up’ on our charitable giving. We budget a certain amount of money from each paycheck for charity. A portion of that goes to our church, and the rest goes into a fund that we can draw from when we are moved to do so.
Thankfully, the money that we give to recognized organizations is still tax-deductable. This is wonderful because it allows us to give more to those that need it, since we get to pay with pre-tax dollars. This also means that if I want to file my taxes with a certain amount of charitable giving claimed, I need to get those checks in the mail before the calendar year clicks over.
Occasionally I am accused of being a Republican Mean Girl because I don’t like welfare. Not liking welfare somehow translates into my not being willing to help those in need. On the contrary, I do enjoy giving my time and resources to those that have fallen on hard times -- which is exactly why I don’t like welfare. Every dollar I am taxed to support various entitlement programs is a dollar I don’t have to give to someone that needs it.
Charity is all about personal choice. I get to choose who I support – missionaries, battered women, sick kids, earthquake survivors, single moms, or even abused and abandoned pets. If I don’t think the money is being spent wisely, I can choose to give it to someone that needs it more. I don’t have the luxury of doing that when the government gets involved, and as we’ve seen time and again, fraud runs rampant in a welfare state, giving a bad name to the truly downtrodden.
The government also has a much higher overhead than private organizations. For every dollar I give to Uncle Sam for welfare programs, seventy cents is lost in bureaucracy and overhead. In contrast, 90% of charities spend at least 65% of incoming donations directly on those in need. Not only does the government deprive me of choosing which causes I’d like to support, it does a shoddy job of redistributing the wealth.
I believe in people. I believe that when a need arises in a community, others will rush to fill that need. After all, America is the most charitable country in the world. Now please excuse me, I need to make sure I have all my deductions in order for 2010, so I can get a teeny break on my taxes and hopefully send a few extra bucks to someone that needs it.
Do People Who Have Kids Deserve Special Treatment?
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Memorial Day Survival Guide
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis

Comments (7)
Great post!
Which is all well and good, but a combo of the two is the best solution. No matter how many people donate to individual causes, you don't have the resources to reach everyone in every situation like the goverment can make available. But bravo for donating to charity. It's admirable. But the two welfare and private charity work together, not compete.
reach everyone in every situation like the goverment can
Boy -couldn't hit the welfare nail on the head any harder than that.....
I LOOOOOOVE this post!! I couldn't agree more.
We also have a rule of giving to charities which I am actively involved in or have been in the past. I would love to be able to choose where my tax dollars go. As for the entitlement programs that the US has run for fifty years? I hate it. I think it is a disincentive. I'd rather they funnel the money into public schools so that education prevents the limited options of the poor in America.
The one part I disagree upon? Church getting tax-exempy status. I think it's wrong and goes against seperation of church and state principles. Sure, let their charitable arms of a church receive tax exempt status, but the every day donations that go toward church camps, church building, political donations ie for CA's Prop 8, etc.? Those should be the cost of running a business because sadly, for most churches, they are businesses and as such they should pay taxes.
~Heather/Scout