
Jenny EriksonThe No Labels movement was launched this week in an effort to move beyond partisan politics and work together for a more effective government. The statement of purpose reads:
We are not labels -- we are people.
We must put our labels aside,
And put the issues and what’s best for the nation first.
A promising future awaits us.
The goal of the centrist group is to provide a home for ‘moderate’ Americans who are turned off by both ends of the political spectrum. No Labels wants to put offices in each of the 435 congressional districts in America and build a network of citizen activists to call out lawmakers that align themselves too closely with their party’s ideology. They will also establish a PAC to help fund candidates that would make Charlie Crist, David Frum, and Kirsten Gillibrand proud.
It all seems a bit hoity-toity to me. What’s wrong with having core values and principles, no matter what end of the spectrum you’re on? I may disagree with hardcore Liberals on a lot of issues, but I can respect people that have developed their own political beliefs and aligned themselves with the party that most closely matches their values.
Who do these No Label people think they are? They condescendingly put down both Liberals and Conservatives, saying they’ve evolved beyond childish squabbling and name-calling. They seem to tell us, “Put your differences aside and come join the grown-ups in the land where everyone holds hands and sings Kumbaya and roasts marshmallows and no one would dare to have an intelligent debate about why raising taxes in a down economy is a really bad idea.”
The funny thing is that No Labels is a label. It’s impossible to escape labels, and I’m not sure why we should try. We’ve been labeling things since Eden, when Adam named all the animals. Labels allow us some stability and perspective in an uncertain world; I know I’m not going to have the same conversation about child rearing with a ‘non-parent’ as I would with a fellow mom. Labels should not be feared.
Wife. Mom. Californian. Christian. Republican. Capitalist. Blogger. Blonde. I embrace my labels – they are what make me uniquely me. No post-partisan, amebic group is going to take that away from me.
What are your labels?
Do People Who Have Kids Deserve Special Treatment?
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Memorial Day Survival Guide
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis

Comments (13)
Your grumbling (about something that should be viewed as positive!) makes you sound like a stubborn child.
"Who do they think they are, trying to compromise and get shit done?!"
Ridiculous.
I understand what they are trying to do. The right and the left are looking out for their parties and all the people filling the pockets and NOT the people they are suppose to represent. Plus, labels are what keep people apart. I am guilty of that and I know others are too. Maybe that is why this group was created. There is still hope.
And it's very interesting that this movement has plenty of Republican supporters. And the support of some former Republicans who now call themselves independents.
I'm really beginning to just feel sorry for people whose egos constantly cloud their thinking.
God forbid anyone compromise. John Boehner can't even say the word, even though he claims he wants to find "common ground."
One person's extremism is another person's deeply held belief.
And why would anyone think that a group like No Labels, which was founded by longtime political operatives for pete's sake, would have anything new to contribute?
This is not about compromise. Why is it that to liberals, 'compromise' means Republicans sitting in the back seat?