In the recent election, for the first time in decades, more women voters cast their ballots for Republicans than Democrats, hoping the GOP would make things better for their budgets and wallets.
So how did the GOP thank all those women for switching sides? By refusing to allow the Paycheck Fairness bill to come up for a vote in the Senate.
Nice way to say, "Thanks for your votes, ladies, but we still think you're worth less than men."
Wooing women voters with promises of looking out for their best interests and then refusing to allow even a fair debate on a bill that would help countless families in this stinky economy was the legislative equivalent of that guy in high school who promised if you put out, he'd take you to the prom. And then he took the head cheerleader like he was always planning, having played you for the fool.
I wish I could lay all the blame at the feet of the GOP for abandoning women's interests, but, sadly, there is plenty to heap on the Democrats and the White House, as well. I've saved my special anger for two Republican women, though -- Senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins.
Snowe and Collins broke ranks with the GOP when they voted in favor of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which was the first bill Barack Obama signed into law when he became President. But that only expanded workers' rights to sue for back pay if they've been discriminated against and they find out about it. The courage Snowe and Collins displayed then by standing up for women didn't last long as they stepped back into line with all the other Republicans, essentially saying to American women that there's no need for getting equal pay in the first place, as long as you can sue for it later.
Don't believe it when you hear the conservative spin that's coming -- why, there's no pay disparity in America! That's all a big myth! Just a liberal fairy tale to make more you feel sorry for people who don't work as hard as others!
Tell that to the women who make 77 cents for every dollar a man earns in the exact same job. Or the women of color who make 62 cents. Or the Latina mom who's really at the bottom of the pay ladder with 53 cents.
This isn't about the choices women make about jobs or careers. This is about elected officials playing political games first and putting people last when it comes to ensuring those extra few cents families desperately need to feed their kids or take them to the pediatrician when they're sick.
The right-wing is going to be busy trying to convince us that it's better for struggling Americans to keep those Bush tax cuts for the uber-rich rather than ensuring that women across the country get the equal pay they deserve. That's just a ploy designed to protect their political donors' tax breaks, not one that gets us out of this recession. I just hope the women who switched their votes in the November mid-terms will see that the GOP never had their best interests at heart and come back to the Democrats in 2012.


This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
This Hot Dad Cooks AND Does the Dishes
















Comments 40
THANK YOU!!! Finally a piece on "The Stir" that explains what really happened and how women got screwed, yet again, by the GOP (yeah, the other piece written on this topic on "The Stir" made me want to throw my computer across the room).
But wait I am fairly moderate and I think its a bunch of bull. We have to stand up for ourselves. Its not because big execs are in boardrooms rubbing their hands together say "oooo we need to keep paying woman less!!" its because WE shoot ourselves in the foot. Hmmmm we don't negotiate at much. I know in my case I was offered the same starting salary as a guy from my college for the same job. I said OK. He got about 5K more per year.... Thats not an exec trying to "keep me down" thats me being non confrontational. I received a not so positive review (and therefore a small raise) I just took it. I can not count how many of my MALE coworkers (including my own husband) went to upper management on recieving a negative review... AND got it reversed (and therefor more raise) Give me a break. No one is plotting against us. We have to stand up FOR OURSELVES and demand what we are worth (And yes its a lesson that I still have not understood very well) we don't need more government intervention....... And there are men in my boat too. The engineer who should have been the lead has consistently just taken the beating - not stood up for himself- and has not been getting the promotions or pay raises he deserves. Do we need legislation to say that all men who can't stand up for themselves need to be paid fairly too???
look at this
http://www.womendontask.com/stats.html
I should explain more - the guy I went to college with I was close with and we both interviewed with and got hired by a large corporation and when HR came and offered me my salary (I got hired about a month before him) I just took it. My friend got offered the exact same but negotiated it and got more....
According to the studies that have been done on this issue, it's the negotiation angle is only a small part of it. When Lilly Ledbetter worked at Goodyear, there was no "negotiating" salary increases -- you got what you got, and the men always got more. Plus, that impacts not only take home pay, but also the amount of retirement funds you have that come from employer-funded plans.
And, yes, they are plotting against us. Maybe not directly, but we are a society that is based on a certain number of women staying out of the work force and staying home. Those ideas run deep when it comes to the employers (still mostly men) who make salary decisions.
And the Lily Ledbetter case - thats why that law passed. It was unfair. But in most cases no one is plotting against anyone. And what is wrong with a society were woman stay out of the workforce??? I work fulltime and I have a career and I enjoy that but whats wrong with my neighbor who wants to stay home with her kids? And if she comes back to work after being out of the workforce for 10 years I expect her to make less then me even if she is the same age and has the same education!
Well, in this instance it is the GOP's fault -- it wasn't a vote on the substance of the bill. It was a vote to allow it to be debated and then voted on. According to the rules of the Senate (as they stand now) they had to have 60 votes. The 58-41 vote was completely along party lines.
Having said that, as I said in the piece, there's plenty of blame. The president as well as his adviser Valerie Jarrett have continually said the White House was "committed" to making this happen. Jarrett said that in response to a question I asked of her at the Netroots Nation conference in 2009, and again on a conference call in 2010. If they were that committed, where were they in leaning on 2 GOP members to merely allow the bill to move to the floor for debate?
Plenty o' blame.
No one is saying there is anything wrong with staying home. That was clearly not the point of this piece. And if you don't think the people at Goodyear had a plan to pay women less than men, then why did theuy pay her less? She received outstanding reviews just as the men did who did her job. She ended up macking less than people she supervised.
And where I work most of the hiring managers and engineers are male but HR makes the salary decisions and most of the HR is female.....