Lady Gaga is being grilled in the press for donning a hat, dress, and shoes made of meat at last night's VMAs. But, surely, that was her intention.
There's no confirmation yet as to whether the meat is real or fake. (Although, all it would take is a call to Cher, who had to hug Gaga when she won the award for "Video of the Year," and we could finally lay that conspiracy theory to rest.)
Nevertheless, the getup offended viewers -- many of whom have taken to calling her "Lady Gag Gag" and accusing her of being ignorant and wearing it as a desperate ploy for attention. And, of course, PETA is jumping into the fray with this acerbic statement:
Lady Gaga has a hard time being "over the top," and wearing a dress made from cuts of dead cows is offensive enough to bring comment, but someone should whisper in her ear that there are more people upset by butchery than impressed by it -- and that means a lot of young people will not be buying her records if she keeps it up.
The PETA statement continues with a rather disturbing visual description of rotting meat and maggots. But before we delve into that any further, can we stop for a second and consider if Gaga perhaps was trying to send a message with her outfit? I hate when civilians take the liberty of assigning bogus intentions to celebrities and artists, but in this particular instance, we (sort of) have proof that Gaga was trying to do more than simply shock and awe. As she told Ellen DeGeneres after the show:
Well, it’s certainly no disrespect to anyone that’s vegan or vegetarian ... I, as you know, am the most judgment-free human being on Earth. However, it has many interpretations -- but for me this evening it’s that if we don’t stand up for what we believe in, if we don’t fight for our rights, pretty soon we’re gonna have as much rights as the meat on our bones. AND I am not a piece of meat.”
Say what you will about Gaga's music; but to call her ignorant is simply unfair. She's been socially active on plenty of occasions -- including last night when she protested "Don't Ask Don't Tell" by showing up with members of the military affected by the policy.
Far from simply trying to get us talking about her (we do that enough already), Gaga seems to have been making a statement about how the press treats celebrities and, in particular, female celebrities -- as pieces of meat. If there's any celeb who's constantly bombarded by the paparazzi, it's Gaga. She's been honest in the past about her body issues stemming from media pressure. She's constantly resisting attempts by the entertainment industry to make her into a sexual icon (like it does with many other female artists).
Maybe this outfit was simply her telling us she's had enough.
And, why are animal lovers so up in arms over this particular outfit? It's no more offensive than leather or fur. If anything, the visual of all that raw meat has been burned into our brains and might have even converted a few meat-eaters to vegetarianism. I, for one, am not going to be ordering a burger anytime soon. Are you with me?
Were you offended by Lady Gaga's meat dress? What do you think she meant by it?
Image via MTV.com


This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
This Hot Dad Cooks AND Does the Dishes
Kanye West is Gay?!
















Comments 10
"She's constantly resisting attempts by the entertainment industry to make her into a sexual icon..."
Really??
I think that is the funniest thing I've heard all day.
Why is that the funniest thing you've heard all day? Sure, she takes her clothes off a lot, but she's doing it to be provactive -- not necessarily to be sexy. There's a difference, I think.
Now that I know the back story on the dress I think its awesome. She felt like a 'piece of meat.' lol
I like how she says that she isn't judgemental but then proceeds to judge the paparazzi, and the don't ask don't tell policy, and (well) everyone else seeing as how she has judged herself to be the 'most judgement-free human being on Earth'. Yeah, right.
Of course it is a ploy for attention- she wants her 'statement' to be noticed. If she just issued a statement (on like Tweet or something) it wouldn't garner the same attention as trying to act like a freak (I say trying because really... the outfits aren't that shocking, freakish in today's world would be dressing conservatively, NOT waling around in a shirt and panties).
So no, I'm not offended by her 'meat-dress'. In fact I could normally care less, the only thing that made me comment on this was the fact that I am pretty shocked that this is in the 'News' section and NOT the entertainment section.
Cafe Kim,
If you parade around "provacatively" by taking off your clothes, you have to be prepared for the inevitable "piece of meat" status that comes with it. It is funny that she believes she is not trying to become a sexual icon. The reputation that she has rightly earned is that she is an overpaid stripper. If she really wanted to invoke thought-provoking conversation and interest in what her opinions are, she would avoid the distraction of a hard-to-shed reputation. I am sure that many resonable people that share her views are offended by her over-exposed sexuality. And people who don't share her views (or don't care) won't even bother listening to her, unless it is strictly to use her image for self-gratification.
The 'non-judegmental' comment is also pretty funny as well, as ethans_mommy pointed out.
Looking at her past outfits, "sexy" isn't the first thing to come to mind so I doubt she is trying to BE sexy. Unless dresses made of meat are your thing...
I wasn't offended by it.
If she feels like a piece of meat, maybe she should stop parading around mostly naked.