
Jenny EriksonDespite what Liberals will have you believe, this right-wing activist, writer, and podcaster is not raking in the dough. I don't even make enough money to pay for childcare, which means that this article is being written while two little girls climb me like blonde mountain goats.
I've been involved in tea parties; I've handed out fliers, I've held signs, and I've even spoken at them. I'm still waiting for that check from the supposedly well-funded tea party leaders.
I'll let you in on a secret: There is no "leader" of the tea party movement. Tea parties were born out of the frustration felt by everyday Americans, who simply didn't want to see their hard-earned dollars go to cocaine-snorting monkeys, let alone to pay for other people's health insurance.
True tea parties -- community protests -- are local groups of people coming together in public places to peacefully show their displeasure over how our elected and appointed officials are representing us. What a gorgeous American display of first amendment rights. Hillary Clinton said it best when she threw her support behind citizens that dared to protest their government:
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic and we should stand up and say, ‘We are America and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration!'"
So I get irritated when The New Yorker runs a piece on the Koch brothers titled "Covert Operations: The billionaire brothers who are waging a war against Obama."
I get even more irritated when The Huffington Post links to the article with the headline: Charles Koch & David Koch, Billionaire Brothers, Bankroll Tea Party.
I hate to break it to the liberal rags, but no one is waging a war on Obama, and no one is bankrolling the tea party. Opposing someone's policies and doing your best to block them does not amount to war, and just because some rich guys support the same cause as a grassroots movement, it doesn't mean they're bankrolling it.
If these uppity liberal journalists continue to believe, despite all evidence to the contrary, that the rapid wave of conservatism overtaking the country is bankrolled by a couple of billionaires, I'd encourage them to look up George Soros.
After all, only Tila Tequila can have it both ways.
Funny Valentine's Day Poems to Give Your Kids
Modamily Site Helps You Find Someone to Have a Baby With
Perfect Chocolate-Covered Strawberries
‘No Child Left Behind’ Screeches to a Halt
Brave Girl Won't Let Rare Disease Steal Her Childhood (VIDEO)
Pink Ribbons Hide the Real Truth About Breast Cancer
Would You Wear These Fang Shoes?!
Mom Delivers 15.5 Pound Baby Boy (VIDEO)
Heart Cookie Pops Perfect for Valentine's Day
Obama's Marshmallow Fight at the White House (VIDEO)
7 Things You Can Do Right Now to Prevent Cancer
Beyonce Trademarks 'Blue Ivy' & Starts a Celebrity Trend
5 Great Gifts for Your Techie Valentine
Angelina & Brad Are Letting Maddox Do What?!
Should the Department of Education Be Abolished?

Comments (8)
Amen!
I first find it amusing that the article you cite as evidence of government mispending is actually about how GOP members who called out certain projects misunderstood what the projects are about. Frankly, I don't think it's ethical to give humans cocaine to find out how it affects their neurotransmittors so we can come up with the best treatments for addiction. The report shows a true disconnect: they ridicule that stimulus money was spent to plant trees, with no thought to the nurseries owners who grow and sell those trees or the people who plant them. They mislead us by listing projects receiving funding secondary to another award, e.g., a project given funds by Ohio. They spent a lot of time out of the house when their wives went through menopause, or they wouldn't ridicule the study of yoga to reduce hot flashes. Another criticized project: new chairlifts & snowmaking equipment at a ski park, because it's not like working chairlifts and snow would encourage people to spend money at the park. Another snarky statement says that disagrees with the use of federal funds to study the relationship between taxes and obesity. Whose job is it? I'm sure the hockey-loving Minnesotans were happy to hear that repairs on a couple of their hockey rinks were ridiculed. I hope they never retire, for they criticize a study of mental health post-retirement.
I really don't think that we can cut people's skulls open and insert probes into them to record neural activity while high on cocaine. We've kind of got rules about not killing human subjects so that we can slice up their brains into small parts to analyze them.
(Rocin: And, at least "raking" was spelled properly. We generally don't "rack" in the dough." And, generally we try to not personally insult each other here. Calling me "Eeuuw" was uncalled for.)