
Photo by Kristen BonsApparently Los Angeles doesn't like the immigration law in Arizona. Well, at least Mayor Villaraigosa and the city council don't like it. Recently they voted 13-1 to boycott Arizona in protest over the state's Constitutional right to enact laws that are supported by a majority of its citizens.
Um, ok.
Arizona is completely within its rights to enact a law that would enable local law enforcement to do the job that our federal government is slacking on -- keeping our borders safe. The immigration law in Arizona is almost a carbon copy of the federal law. Let me sum it up -- if you want to live and work in America, please do so legally.
I understand that our current immigration process is a mess. But how can we address the issue of opening the front door a little wider when the back gate is swinging in the wind and no one is standing guard? We have to close that back gate to keep the criminals out.
That being said, I also believe that people are completely within their rights to boycott something that they don't agree with. Personally, I try to avoid Alec Baldwin as much as possible because I think he's a turd. If people disagree with Arizonian laws, there's a simple solution for them: Don't visit Arizona.
I'm talking about people, individual citizens, not an entire city. What does it even mean for a city to boycott a state anyway? Are Los Angelinos allowed to visit the Grand Canyon state? Purchase products produced there? I know I don't want to live in a city where my elected officials tell me where I can and can't go.
I also expect my city council to look out for my best interests when applicable. I don't think the 13 city council members in the City of Angels that voted in favor of boycotting Arizona considered their citizens' welfare one iota when they said, "Yea." If they had, they would've realized that a quarter of their city's electricity comes from Arizona power plants.
It's a two-way street, people.
Gary Pierce recognizes the flawed thinking of the Los Angeles city council. As a commissioner on the five-member Arizona Corporation Commission, he's prepared to give the people what they want. In a letter to Mayor Villaraigosa, Pierce proposes that further economic ties be severed between the two locales.
"If an economic boycott is truly what you desire, I will be happy to encourage Arizona utilities to renegotiate your power agreements so Los Angeles no longer receives any power from Arizona-based generation. I am confident that Arizona's utilities would be happy to take those electrons off your hands."
The ball is in your court, Los Angeles. Are you willing to dim the lights by 25 percent in order to stand firm in your beliefs? I may not agree with it, but at least it would show some integrity.
Funny Valentine's Day Poems to Give Your Kids
Modamily Site Helps You Find Someone to Have a Baby With
Perfect Chocolate-Covered Strawberries
‘No Child Left Behind’ Screeches to a Halt
Brave Girl Won't Let Rare Disease Steal Her Childhood (VIDEO)
Pink Ribbons Hide the Real Truth About Breast Cancer
Would You Wear These Fang Shoes?!
Mom Delivers 15.5 Pound Baby Boy (VIDEO)
Heart Cookie Pops Perfect for Valentine's Day
Obama's Marshmallow Fight at the White House (VIDEO)
7 Things You Can Do Right Now to Prevent Cancer
Beyonce Trademarks 'Blue Ivy' & Starts a Celebrity Trend
5 Great Gifts for Your Techie Valentine
Angelina & Brad Are Letting Maddox Do What?!
Should the Department of Education Be Abolished?

Comments (23)
"What does it even mean for a city to boycott a state anyway?"
Maybe you should find out before you write an article about it.
*Sigh*
So much for humor...
FTR - I love your humor! hee hee (and your take on Alec Baldwin *shudder*)
True story- I got to meet Stephen Baldwin a few months ago, and I flat out said, "Hi I'm Jenny, and until today when I heard you speak, I didn't know there was a sane Baldwin brother!"
And then I turned a crimson shade of red.
And then he asked if he could hug me.
It's one of about four cool things that has happened to me in my life.
I think I have agreed with all of your posts that I have read to date! I, too, am curious to know HOW Los Angeles is going to react to the letter from Mr. Pierce. If they were completely serious about their childish boycott, they will promptly take him up on his offer to renegotiate. But, seeing their hypocrisy front and center in the nation, I think they may reconsider their boycott. At least, if they have any sense they will.
It's hysterical that the group that is always complaining about states rights and being free from the oppression of the federal government is blaming non-intervention by the feds for the passage of a draconian state law. Fox talking point - check. I also believe that all Americans are free to express their feelings about the law and if that means that you choose to boycott Arizona then that's just an expression of your freedom. As soon as a state passes a law that requires ALL suspected illegal immigrants and not just the brown ones, then I'll believe it's not racial profiling.
FTR, to HMMM above:
those who are advocating for states rights believe the federal government exists for one reason, and that is to keep the citizens secure. READ: military and border.
Also for HMM above:
WHERE, specifically, in the 10 page bill does it say that only brown people are suspected to be illegal immigrants? It doesn't sound at all like you have even looked at, much less read, the bill. It sounds like you have been listening to Napolitano, Holder, et al, who have recently admitted that they have NOT READ THE BILL. I think you should read it before you comment on it.
First, Los Angeles OWNS the power plants sited in Arizona, so that's a non-starter. Even if it did not, would it serve Arizona to cut off its nose to spite its own face by losing a major customer?
Arguing that Arizona's new law is "almost" like federal law is like saying the Gulf of Mexico is "mostly" pristine. It fails to address the shocking illegalities..
Hmmm- I don't think you even read my article, let alone SB 1070.
Maezppa- uh... have you read SB 1070? It is nearly identical to what we have on the Federal books.