
Photo by Kristen BonsI'm not exactly what you'd call a crunchy mom. I love the convenience of disposable diapers. I drive an SUV that holds over 25 gallons of gasoline at a time. I'm hopelessly addicted to my BlackBerry.
Since I'm an advocate of free choice, I have no qualms whatsoever with other mamas that choose to cloth-diaper their kiddos, buckle them into the Prius, then snuggle them into the sling while they browse the aisles at their local health food store. It's just not for me.
For better or worse and to each their own. As parents, we all try to do what's best for our children within the confines of our lifestyles. We make sure they get the rest they need, we take them to the doctor when they're sick, and we kiss and bandage boo-boos with abandon. And of course we feed them as healthy of a diet as we can get into their picky little mouths and down their stubborn little throats.
Like I said, I've never exactly been the Earth Mother type. Chicken nuggets with processed ketchup constituted health food for a long time in our house. However, over the last few months, I've slowly been changing our family's diet to include more healthful choices: Whole wheat instead of white; the cloudy pulpy apple juice instead of the clear stuff; organic produce when I could afford it.
Call it a phase, call it a lifestyle change, call it a whim, call it whatever, but call it my choice. I'm the mama around here and it's my job to feed my family, and I choose to make sandwiches with whole wheat bread, and if the kids don't like it, then they must not be that hungry anyway. Not that, um, those words have ever escaped my lips at the dinner table (cough cough).
In talking to some of my lovely crunchy mom friends, I started learning about raw milk. It sounded dangerous to me. The FDA says it's unsafe, and besides, everyone that has ever watched Survivor knows you're supposed to boil water before you drink it to kill off any harmful bacteria. Shouldn't that hold true with milk as well? Surely milk needs to be cooked in the pasteurization process before it's safe to consume ... right?
Maybe not.
When milk first started to be pasteurized over a hundred years ago, it was a direct response to the dirty milk being produced at the time. Farmers were feeding their dairy cows waste products from nearby whiskey distilleries instead of fresh grass. The animals lived in their own feces and were generally hand-milked. Not exactly a healthy environment, and it produced very dirty milk that made many people very sick. Pasteurization killed off the bacteria, thus making the milk safe to drink.
Cows are no longer fed distillery waste, but they're fed soy and corn, which their bodies aren't meant to process. Either God or evolution created cows that need grass and hay to be healthy and produce clean, healthy milk. When the cows are fed grain instead of grass, their milk has to be pasteurized to make it safe for human consumption.
The problem with pasteurization is that it kills off the good stuff as well as the bad. Milk loses much of its nutritional value when it's cooked, just like any other food out there.
But what about the cleanliness of the milk? After some more research, I discovered that not all milk is created equal. Even the most ardent supporters of raw milk say that they'd never drink the stuff destined for pasteurization. Why? Because it may contain up to 100,000 bacteria per milliliter, leaving as many as 20,000 of those bugs alive after the cooking process. In comparison, raw milk standards in California require that the milk contain fewer than 15,000 bacteria per milliliter. That's right, the raw milk I buy is most likely cleaner than the more popular, heavily processed stuff.
I made the decision to provide my family with raw milk, and thankfully I can legally buy it at my local natural foods store in California. In a few days, moms in Wisconsin may be able to make the same choice that I have. On Tuesday of this week, raw milk advocates in Wisconsin will come together at the state capitol to encourage Governor Jim Doyle to sign into law a recent bill passed by the state legislator that would legalize the sale of raw milk in the state.
I'm not saying that raw milk or even milk of any kind is the right choice for every family. But shouldn't we all be able to choose for ourselves? Or should we rely on a government that tells us what we can and can't eat?
Funny Valentine's Day Poems to Give Your Kids
Modamily Site Helps You Find Someone to Have a Baby With
Perfect Chocolate-Covered Strawberries
‘No Child Left Behind’ Screeches to a Halt
Brave Girl Won't Let Rare Disease Steal Her Childhood (VIDEO)
Pink Ribbons Hide the Real Truth About Breast Cancer
Would You Wear These Fang Shoes?!
Mom Delivers 15.5 Pound Baby Boy (VIDEO)
Heart Cookie Pops Perfect for Valentine's Day
Obama's Marshmallow Fight at the White House (VIDEO)
7 Things You Can Do Right Now to Prevent Cancer
Beyonce Trademarks 'Blue Ivy' & Starts a Celebrity Trend
5 Great Gifts for Your Techie Valentine
Angelina & Brad Are Letting Maddox Do What?!
Should the Department of Education Be Abolished?

Comments (28)
"When the cows are fed grain instead of grass, their milk has to be pasteurized to make it safe for human consumption" - that is udder nonsense! the milk from grain fed cattle is no "dirtier" then grass fed. It is differnt and grass fed is definitly healthier but that statement is rubish.
I grew up on a dairy farm, drinking the milk that was destined to be pastuerized, as did all of my friends. We never got EColi because we had resistance to it because we were contastantly exposed to small doses of it. I have read of studies that shows that kids on farms or those to drink raw milk are less likely to get ecoli (assuming of course that the raw milk is handled correctly). I personally can not stand the taste of "store milk". Back home I was always able to find a farmer who would let you get a gallon or two from his bulk tank, now in the city I miss milk soooo much!!
My mother in law got very sick from drinking raw milk, but the government should stay the hell out of it.
I agree that this should most definatly be a personal choice. However the government should feel free to warn people about the possible repurcussions of their choice- but the people should still be allowed to make it.
Personally I don't like the taste, but then I didn't grow up with it. My parents on the other hand love the stuff.
I grew up drinking raw milk because my dad was a daity farmer at the time. I think I turned out OK! ;) -- Joanne
Raw milk is a fantastic thing. and living in a dairy community, I'm all for giving the farmers alternative ways to make a profit.
As for gov't staying out of it, I think it's a rough thing. I do think it should be more widely available, but technically do we really want the gov't to STOP checking the bacteria levels and stop regulating the farmers? Based on all the problems we've had in the last year or two with food contamination, what we need is better regulation, not less.
I grew up drinking goat's milk, from the goat that I had to milk. I believe that if handled correctly, raw milk is fine for human consumption. I believe I have read/heard that it is beneficial to some people, but I can't remember the whole thing -- there was a big article about this topic in our local newspaper some time ago. I firmly believe this should be a choice made by the consumer, not the government.
Prior to pasteurization, milk was accountable for a large portion of all foodborne illness, even before "big dairy" existed. We've been getting sick from milk since people first domesticated cows. Some illnesses were ones that we don't need to worry as much about today (e.g. tuberculosis), but others are still familiar, like salmonella, campylobacter, and E. coli. While these can be minimized though careful management and regular testing, no precautions are 100% effective at preventing them in raw milk. Time and again, authorities have found that the accumulated evidence shows that no standards or practices can eliminate the risk enough to merit exemption for even the best producers.
I agree that people have the right to choose what to eat for themselves, but I urge you reconsider feeding raw milk to your children. Children don't have a fully developed immune system, and are vulnerable to pathogens that might not be as serious for a healthy adult. We may be exposed to risk in everything we eat these days, but raw milk is unique. Even when produced according to high standards and consumed as intended, there's a built-in risk. Lettuce doesn't have E. coli on it if it's properly handled, and beef is safe if cooked to the right temperature, but drinking raw milk is always a calculated risk.
Please think twice before you make that choice for your children, and please don't make that choice for others - always let people know when the milk or cheese they're eating is raw.
Jeanne- I'm totally cool w/ govt. monitoring the bacteria levels and such. :-)
If you are really interested in providing healthful food, go to http://www.notmilk.com/.
Patrick, rest assured that I tell my guests that the milk is raw. I would put that on par with lying about meat in something to a vegetarian. Definitely not cool.