Roe v. Wade ensures American women at the federal level with the right to a safe and legal abortion, but that is by no means stopping states from attempting to chip away at -- or in this most recent case, take a chainsaw to -- that right. The most recent offending state: Virginia, where the GOP supermajority "muscled [through] two of the most restrictive anti-abortion bills in years," according to the AP.
The first, like many that have been floated and gone back and forth in other southern states, would require that doctors give women a transvaginal ultrasound (which, if you're not familiar, involves insertion of a condom-covered probe into the vagina to obtain an image during the very early stages of a pregnancy) before they can have an abortion. The second -- also familiar -- basically asserts that a person's rights should begin from the moment the sperm meets the egg. INSANE.
Right now, it looks like the first bill has a better shot at getting turned into a law, as the GOP Governor, Bob McConnell, has pledged to support that one, but has yet to say how he feels about declaring a zygote a person with rights. (Does that mean that if a woman miscarries, she could be convicted of murder? Hey, it's a legit Q if this is actually being treated as a legit bill in state legislature ...)
Maybe it's the fact that the year is 2012, Roe v. Wade was passed almost 40 years ago, and we're still second-guessing women and doctors. Maybe it's that the same party that says they want "hands-off government" is in support of the state forcing physicians to perform an invasive ultrasound on a woman before she can have a voluntarily, LEGAL procedure. Either way, I'm having trouble wrapping my head around how scary it is that Virginia is this close to trampling the rights of thousands of people and virtually outlawing abortion.
Not to mention how legislation like this is in no one's best interest, especially not women. These bills, if they become laws, will do nothing but create more physical and mental anguish for women in the state of Virginia, some of whom have already had to make the difficult decision to have an abortion, and some of whom may be interested in carrying their baby to term but are faced with a miscarriage or other unfortunate circumstance that terminates the pregnancy. There's just no way around it: Bills like these HURT WOMEN.
Where do you stand on bills like the ones VA Republicans are attempting to pass?
Image via Debra Sweet/Flickr
Do People Who Have Kids Deserve Special Treatment?
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies
How to Pack a No-Waste Lunch
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis
Vampire Sex and Vajazzling (it's...

Comments (94)
If they ever successfully outlaw it, they will change their minds when they see all the horrors that will come about afterward and wish they listened to all the "baby killers"
What about the rights of the unborn child? Also, having a miscarraige and an abortion are two different things. When you go to the doctor and you are likely miscarrying they give you a vaginal ultrasound anyway. I am for this bill and think that if some girls/women could hear the heartbeat and see that there is a little baby inside of them they may rethink killing it. If you are not ready for a baby then don't lay down and do the deed that will get you pregnant. That simple. If you did do the deed and end up pregnant, there are a lot of families out there that would love to adopt your child. Abortion is murder.
oh yeah, and just because something is legal does not mean it is especially right, moral or good for you. Alcohol is legal but kills thousands every year.
I'm sorry if this offends people but I highly beleive in the ultrasound before abortion laws. And I'm sorry but the ultrasound probe is nowhere near as invasive as a penis and it sure as hell is less invasive than the barbaric looking tools needed to perform the actual abortion, When Norma McCorvey (the roe in roe v. wade) asks for the law to be overturned maybe we should listen. W jnhjhkjhy do our children have less right just because they are inside our bodies instead of out..
I'll support an ultrasound law IF it can be done in the same appointment as the abortion and IF it doesn't add extra expense to the patient and IF it's done for purposes of dating the pregnancy to determine which termination method is most appropriate. I do feel that transvaginal ultrasound can be much more invasive and more uncomfortable than a penis but can be seen as a necessary evil as long as it is done with those stipulations.
The personhood laws are ridiculous and I would not support one under any circumstances. What anti-abortionists seem to not realize is that chipping away at abortion rights, or even outlawing abortion all together, is not going to make them stop. Women have been terminating pregnancies for thousands of years, and will continue to do so regardless of laws. All pro-lifers are advocating for is a return to back-alley procedures which are more likely to result in the death of the woman as well as the fetus, which makes pro-lifers at least as morally wrong as they claim pro-choicers to be. Just let it go and focus on something in your own life - stay out of the rights of others.
I do think that we could do more to promote adoption as an option, particularly to young women who aren't ready to support a child but aren't really willig to abort it either. For people to stand behind adoption we would need to have good laws supporting adoptive parents and great health care for people who are pregnant. That being said, I don't thik it's the job of the government to determin morality. I can think of plenty of situations in which young women I know just didn't need to have a kid. Also, while I would never choose to abort a child, I can understand not wanting to have a child who will never be able to live with out your care because one day you will die and then what happens to your poor baby? There are two many factors and unless you can prove their is an increased risk to not performing an untra sound before the procedure than you can't dictate how doctors do their work. Wait... we have the AMA to police doctors. Nevermind there's no need for these laws.