Natalie Strawn, the 20-year-old from Nebraska who appeared on GMA yesterday to discuss her 282-pound weight loss, has become something of a celebrity overnight. People all over the U.S. are fascinated by her battle with the scale and also what she stands for: an "in-your-face!" to the obesity epidemic the country has been grappling with. And sure, we always love a heartwarming, uplifting success story. But I'm positive there's more to it than that.
We think, "Well, whatever she did to lose almost 300 pounds can, without a doubt, help me lose 10, 40, or 100, right?" But what she's doing isn't exactly what many of us want to hear.
On GMA, Strawn shared that she's been following Weight Watchers and that what she loves about the plan is its flexibility. She can pretty much eat "whatever she wants," as long as she watches her portions. And while you'd think that would be something someone looking to lose weight would seek in a program, it actually scares the hell out of lots of people. We're so brainwashed to think we need a DIET -- with rigorous rules and regulations and lists of "can't haves." Bonus points if it's a fad popular diet -- something attached to a celebrity, Dr. Oz, a book, or a disease ("Let's cut out gluten completely, even if we're not allergic to it, but just to see if that leads to slimming success, wheee!!").
That's why diets like Slim Fast and Jenny Craig and NutriSystem do very well. People who go for those systems claim they "don't have time" to cook for themselves. They'd prefer to be told what to eat or given a boxed lunch, so they don't "have to think" about making the right choice when given a choice.
That's fine, but "dieters" are the ones who could really stand to learn a thing or two from Natalie. She's going to be better off than people who need a quick fix, a fad diet, pre-packaged and pre-approved food. Because having to think and make those tough decisions -- like whether or not to spend your daily allotted calories on a brownie or whether you're going to treat yourself to that cocktail (even if it means skipping the pasta) -- leads to long-term weight loss success. It's about being an active participant in your own weight loss journey instead of being passive follower of a diet.
Sure, with a lifestyle program like WW, there are "tricks" involved -- like coming up with lighter versions of your favorite dessert (brownies made with yogurt instead of eggs!), or remembering that if "you bite it, you write it" in your food journal. But these are actually just healthy habits you want to and can easily adopt for a lifetime. They're what will help Natalie get to her goal weight and maintain it for years to come. I can't imagine that anyone looking to lose weight would want to settle for "tricks" that deliver anything less.
How do you feel about fad dieting?
Image via ABC
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
How Tarot Cards Cured My Nightmares
Robin Gibbs Dies: 5 Greatest Bee Gees Songs (VIDEOS)
A User's Manual for My Daughter to Remember Me By
Stupid Reason #768 Kids Get Suspended From School (VIDEO)
Mom Confession: I Never Wanted to Be a Mother
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis
Vampire Sex and Vajazzling (it's...
Raising Digital Kids
Best Father-Daughter Dance Ever!

Comments (11)
it's not terrible if you can transition into eating healthy portions. im against weight watchers now because, though their plan worked about 7 years ago, they now created a plan that, if you follow it TO A T you will lose maybe a pound a week....so they can drain your money longer. low-no carb diets are cool too, if you can maintain that life style. it's fast weight loss and after a while you lose your desire for carbs, i lost 15 pounds in 3 weeks and had no desire for bread/pasta/sugar...and im italian! idk...to each his/her own
Eat a packet of high fiber oatmeal for breakfast, whatever you want for lunch (sandwich, side of fries and a diet soda), apple as an afternoon snack and a tomato/cucumber/feta salad with olive oil and vinegar for dinner. 1 hour at the gym 4 times a week. I am 5'4 and 115lbs. It's not that hard.
@zizz - Wow, I am in awe of anyone who can eat only part of a cupcake! I'm a thin junk-food lover too, but I eat regular portions and run about 40 miles a week. I feel a lot less deprived than when I tried to cut portion sizes or ban junk food. What people don't seem to get is that calories are calories, so you may as well eat what you enjoy instead of diet food, whether you eat smaller portions or work out more. Totally agree with you about indulgence v. gluttony!
Eat less, move more. That's all there is to it. You don't need to cut out carbs (which, doing so, by the way, leads to screwing up your metabolism BIG time, not to mention a severe lack of energy) or some other fad diet. Fad diets are temporary. People need to educate themselves on what their BMI is, how many calories their daily goal should be to lose x amount each week, etc. I still eat fast food sometimes but not as much anymore. And I run. (A Happy Meal can be burned by about 40 minutes or so on an elliptical.) So if you're the type of person who doesn't want to be deprived, read the labels and prepare to burn some calories later.