'Dating Naked' Star Sues Because Program Showed Her Too Naked

dating naked lawsuit

If you go on a show like VH1's Dating Naked, you can safely expect two things: That you will be naked, and that you will be seen on television -- still naked. Unless, of course, you are contestant Jessie Nizewitz who is suing Viacom, VH1's parent company, for exposing her naked lower-half on the show.

Um, okay, I have zero sympathy for this broad, am I alone in this? Jessie thinks the show should pay her $10 million for revealing her private parts to the cable-having world. I think she is insane. 

According to Jessie, the show assured her that they would blur out her private parts by the time the show made it to prime-time. But, in a naked wrestling scene, Jessie's bits and bobbles were totally unblurred and totally on display. Whoops. 

Here's the thing, though. The way I see it, if you sign up to go on a naked, televised date with a stranger that involved nude wrestling and coating each other in mud ... you can't feign being indignant when the show can't quite manage to cover every inch of your naked form! Surely you had to know going onto the show that your naked body was going to be exposed.

Do you know how many people it takes to film a TV show? Spoiler alert: It is a lot. Jessie had no issue filming the show in front of a throng of strangers who got way more of an eye-full than the blink-and-you'll-miss-it display that viewers had access to. To me this doesn't smell right, it seems malicious and stupid. How hard up can you be for cash if you're willing to publicly embarrass yourself? I mean, I guess the same question applies to folks willing to be on the show in the first place. Ha. 

What do you think about Jessie's lawsuit?

 

Image via Twitter

reality tv

6 Comments

To add a comment, please log in with

Use Your CafeMom Profile

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Comment As a Guest

Guest comments are moderated and will not appear immediately.

TheSi... TheSilence

They signed a contract stating they would blur it out, they failed to do so, they are in the wrong. It doesn't even matter why they didn't or what she was doing, they broke the contract. They will end up paying her off.

IKnow... IKnow0101

What does the contract say? If it states her lady parts were going to be blurred they need to open their pockets.

nonmember avatar Virginia

Your on a naked show enough said naked hello

Gamer... Gamer_mom1

I don't care what you think of her.


 


They said they would blur. Instead they showed a shot of her on the ground bent over with vagina wide open in full view.


They didn't keep up their end. I don't care if there was one camera man or 1,000. Repeat after me slowly...


They.... said... they... would.. BLUR FOR TV....They failed to do so.


The end.

Gamer... Gamer_mom1

But I'm sure you just want to "punish the slut"

1-6 of 6 comments