'DWTS' Fans Claim Peta Murgatroyd & James Maslow's Votes Are Rigged

Peta Murgatroyd James Maslow Amy Purdy Derek Hough

Things are really getting down to the wire as far as winning Season 18 of Dancing With the Stars goes, so it's really no secret that every single vote counts when it comes to keeping your favorites around for another week. (Or do they?)

Believe it or not, fans of Peta Murgatroyd and James Maslow claim DWTS manipulated their votes -- and they aren't too happy about it.

They took to Twitter to voice their concerns after voting this week, as some of them believe their votes for Peta and James either did not count, or were changed to go towards one of the other couples.

Supposedly when some fans cast their votes for Peta and James, their app told them they'd actually voted for Maksim Chmerkovskiy and Meryl Davis instead. And if that's the case, it's understandable for them to be upset, since they're obviously supporting Peta and James to take the mirror ball trophy.

Wouldn't you be pissed if your vote somehow wound up being given to someone else? (Duh.)

And I guess we could write this off as a mere glitch in the voting system, but this isn't the first time there has been speculation that DWTS producers rig the whole show to ensure that certain couples remain in the competition until the very end.

Even though there's probably no way in hell Meryl and Maks won't make it into the final three, can you even imagine if somehow they weren't standing there at the end? They've been the duo to beat all season long, so it would be a real blow to ratings if they didn't have one last shot at winning the trophy on the finale.

And when you take these fans' claims and couple them with the fact that Sean Avery basically hinted that DWTS is fixed early on in the season, it's impossible not to wonder just how much of a reality this "reality show" really is.

As much as we'd love to believe that our favorites are coming back each week because we help keep them on the show, it wouldn't exactly be the shock of the century if we have absolutely no influence on who stays and who goes. Although, if that's truly the case, it really does ruin some of the fun and allure of the whole deal. I mean, what's the point of rooting for someone all season if their place in the competition is already predetermined?

But on a positive note, if DWTS is rigged, at least we don't have to feel guilty when we forget to vote each week. (Oh come on, I know I'm not the only one who says "to hell with it" and goes straight to bed as soon as it's over.)

Do you think DWTS is fixed?


Image via ABC

dancing with the stars


To add a comment, please log in with

Use Your CafeMom Profile

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Comment As a Guest

Guest comments are moderated and will not appear immediately.

2rcom4t 2rcom4t

I didn't have a problem when I voted for them, But I gave the majority of my votes to Maks because I think they should win.

SoJaided SoJaided

I love DWTS, but I think the public's votes should only be half of what determines the outcome. As much as I love Candace, there is no freaking way she should have stayed over Charlie. It's ridiculous.

Glenn Simpson

I think that if it was fixed, having the system actually tell you when it put your vote on someone else would be a pretty stupid way to do it.  So I think it was just a glitch.  Now, the overall philosophy of the process could be considered.  I've thought they need to have people vote for who they DON'T want to have back.

Shirley Strickler

I agree no way Charlie should have gone home,Amy or Candace should have gone!!

Juliette Alorda Thompson

No I do not think it is rigged, but I do believe there is partially shown by the judges

Florence Robinson

I do NOT believe it is rigged,  The voters chose who wins.

nonmember avatar Merideth

you are very naïve if you do not think that it is rigged in some way.

1-8 of 8 comments